[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
June 3, 2021

Equity and the JAMA Network

Author Affiliations
  • 1Executive Editor and Interim Editor in Chief, JAMA and the JAMA Network
  • 2Executive Managing Editor, JAMA and the JAMA Network
  • 3Editor, JAMA Health Forum
  • 4Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 5Editor, JAMA Cardiology
  • 6Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • 7Editor, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • 8Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 9Editor, JAMA Pediatrics
  • 10Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle, Washington
  • 11Editor, JAMA Oncology
  • 12Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 13Editor, JAMA Neurology
  • 14Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
  • 15Editor, JAMA Surgery
  • 16Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 17Editor, JAMA Psychiatry
  • 18McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts
  • 19Editor, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
  • 20Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
  • 21Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • 22Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • 23Editor, JAMA Network Open
  • 24Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 25Editor, JAMA Dermatology
  • 26Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco
  • 27Deputy Editor, JAMA Cardiology
  • 28Vice Dean, Diversity and Inclusion, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(8):1119-1121. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2927

The key objective of JAMA is “To promote the science and art of medicine and the betterment of the public health”; similar objectives and mission statements are supported by all 12 JAMA Network Journals. Together this family of journals is committed to publishing the best research, reviews, and opinion articles to advance medical science, promote public health, and improve patient care. The ultimate goal is to promulgate truth in science and medicine.

On February 23, 2021, a podcast titled “Structural Racism for Doctors—What Is It?” was posted by the JAMA Network and on the following day, a tweet was posted to promote the podcast. Assertions in both that disavowed the presence of structural racism in medicine and among physicians were wrong, misguided, and uninformed. An extensive evidence base strongly supports the presence of structural racism in medicine and its adverse influence on health.1 The process for reviewing and publishing the podcast and tweet was also flawed. On March 4, 2021, Howard Bauchner, MD, editor in chief of JAMA and the 12 JAMA Network Journals, took responsibility and issued an apology for the podcast and tweet. This editorial team also expresses a profound apology for the misinformation in the podcast and tweet and recognizes the hurt, anger, and outrage that resulted.

These events and developments make it clear that JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals can and must do better and advance toward inclusion and antiracism in all journal-related activities. Even though these journals have made progress, additional commitment and work are needed to build on and intensify these efforts to achieve meaningful, sustainable change. For instance, previous efforts include the more than 650 research, review, and opinion articles on race, racism, and racial and ethnic disparities and inequities that have been published in JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals since 2015,1 including editorials in JAMA on topics such as race and medical research,2 race and poverty and medicine,3 enhancing diversity in medical schools,4 and equity related to COVID-19 vaccines.5

In addition, within the past year, JAMA Network Open and JAMA Health Forum issued calls for manuscripts on prevention and effects of systemic racism in health6,7; JAMA Psychiatry initiated an editorial fellowship prioritized to early-career academic psychiatrists from underrepresented backgrounds; and JAMA Surgery issued a “Call to Action” to all surgery journal editors for diversity in the editorial and peer review process.8 The JAMA editors and editorial staff also began a thorough revision of guidance for authors and editors on reporting race and ethnicity in medical journals and earlier this year issued a wide call for feedback.9 The journals had been charged to continue to diversify their editors and editorial board members; as of May 15, 2021, among the 346 editors and editorial board members across JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals, 71% are White, 19% are Asian, 6% are Black, and 4% are Hispanic. Within this group, 38% are women, including 4 editors in chief of 4 JAMA Network Journals.

The editors of JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals remain steadfastly committed to improving diversity, equity, and inclusion. As an important next step, the editors herein have developed a range of editorial priorities and approaches to strive for and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (Box).

Box Section Ref ID

Ongoing and New Editorial Priorities and Key Approaches of JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals to Strive for and Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

  • Update Journal Mission Statements: Add DEI aims to the mission statements of JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals.

  • Appoint an Editorial Director of Equity: Conduct a national search to identify and recruit a full-time, senior-level editor to serve as director of equity at JAMA and the JAMA Network, reporting to the JAMA editor in chief. This editor will lead efforts to promote equity at JAMA and help guide efforts of other editors for equity at each of the JAMA Network Journals.

  • Convene DEI Summit: Convene a multidisciplinary summit including leaders with expertise in DEI from medicine and other disciplines; JAMA and JAMA Network editors and editorial boards; researchers; authors and peer reviewers; practicing physicians, residents, other early-career physicians, and medical students; and other groups to provide input and suggestions for editorial and journal policies, procedures, and programs concerning these issues.

  • Improve Editorial Diversity: Continue to increase the diversity of editors, editorial boards, advisory committees, and editorial staff of JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals in terms of self-identified gender, race, ethnicity, and intersectionality, and recruit qualified physicians and researchers with specific expertise in topics related to DEI in biomedical research, clinical investigation, and health policy. Publish statistics on the diversity of the editors and editorial boards on each journal website.

  • Promote Awareness of and Responsibility for DEI: Promote and support education, awareness, and conversations about issues and concerns related to DEI and subconscious or implicit bias among editors, editorial board members, and editorial staff. Encourage all to commit to increasing understanding, listening, acceptance, self-reflection, and change. Ensure that all policies and procedures contribute to an inclusive and antiracist environment and culture.

  • Formalize Process for Assessment and Reporting: Establish an assessment and reporting committee consisting of JAMA and JAMA Network Journal editors and editorial board members and those with expertise in DEI to develop metrics for measuring success; monitor ongoing initiatives and progress; report at least biannually to the editor in chief, editorial director of equity, and journal oversight committee; and recommend approaches for public reporting.

  • Expand Editorial Fellowship Program: Develop fellowship programs in medical editing for physicians underrepresented in medicine to acquire education and training in medical journalism and scientific editing at JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals.

  • Hold Seminars on Excellence in Scientific Writing: Provide writing and publishing seminars specifically for fellows of populations underrepresented in medicine and early-career faculty to help increase success in accepted publications in JAMA Network Journals and other medical journals.

  • Continue to Publish Articles on DEI: Continue to publish important research, review, and opinion articles on DEI while continuously updating the Health Disparities Topic Collection, which includes numerous articles on a wide range of topics related to DEI, including the compendium of research, review, and opinion articles on race, racism, and racial and ethnic disparities and inequities that have been published in JAMA and the JAMA Network journals during the last 5 years.1

  • Identify and Invite Peer Reviewers and Authors of Opinion Articles With DEI Expertise: Enhance and increase inclusion of peer reviewers with expertise in DEI across the JAMA Network Journal databases. This includes nearly 40 secondary subject areas in the databases under the primary category of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” From this expanded network, identify authoritative authors on these topics when inviting editorials and commentaries.

  • Encourage Authors to Address Systemic and Structural Problems to Advance DEI: For research manuscripts directly related to specific issues involving social determinants of health and DEI, encourage authors to provide a balanced discussion of the implications of the findings for addressing institutional racism and structural racism, including in the health care system. For relevant articles, solicit authoritative editorials or invited commentaries to discuss the implications of the reports for advancing DEI in research, health care, and society.

  • Review and Update Inclusive Language Guidance for Authors and Editors: Regularly review and update guidance for authors and editors on the use of inclusive language in medical and science journals, including reporting policies and preferred usage of terms related to race and ethnicity, sex and gender, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, and persons with diseases, disorders, or disabilities (as provided in the AMA Manual of Style and in each journal’s Instructions for Authors).

  • Update Statistical Analysis Guidance: Convene a meeting of the statistical editors for JAMA and the JAMA Network to discuss and make recommendations on how variables related to race and ethnicity and social determinants of health are used in statistical analyses and reported in research articles.

  • Participate in International Collaboration on Standards and Policies: Participate in the Royal Society of Chemistry’s Joint Commitment for Action on Inclusion and Diversity in Publishing.10 The JAMA Network has joined this international collaboration with many other prominent journal publishers that are working to ensure a more inclusive and diverse culture within scholarly publishing, such as by determining methods for collection of data from authors and reviewers regarding gender, race, ethnicity, and other factors; establishing procedures for ethically appropriate collation, use, and monitoring of those data; and sharing policies and standards on inclusion and diversity in publishing.

These currently stated editorial priorities serve as a revised foundation to support a comprehensive, meaningful, and sustainable strategy that addresses diversity, equity, and inclusion across JAMA and the JAMA Network journals. The strategy also involves the need to further reflect on other aspects of individual and structural bias within the network where additional areas of improvement can be identified and addressed.

The guiding principles of implementation involve

  • leadership, including a culture that begins with the journal editors, predicated on awareness of and commitment to ensuring diversity, equity, and inclusion in all journal activities and operations;

  • inclusion, from a broad-based conceptual perspective regarding inclusivity, not simply based on representation; welcomes science that reflects the intersectionality of inclusion, equity, and health; and includes diverse individuals and perspectives among the editorial leadership, the editors and editorial staff, and editorial boards of the JAMA Network Journals;

  • accountability, as reflected in accepting responsibility to promote diversity in all aspects of the scientific publication process;

  • transparency, accomplished with public reporting of progress and next steps; and

  • opportunity, by leveraging the influence of the JAMA Network as a leading voice on equity and providing education for the next generation of authors, peer reviewers, and editors.

Achieving equity will involve more than multistep processes and rearticulated mission statements; culture change is necessary. At this point in the arc of medicine and scientific publication, it is crucial for all journals to fulfill renewed editorial and journal missions that include a heightened and appropriate emphasis on equity and publication of information that addresses structural racism with the goal of overcoming its effects in medicine and health care. The JAMA Network Journals and other leading medical journals must take clear steps to do better, with more awareness, more transparency, more accountability, and more diversity. This is all for the good. The intersection between society, health, and equity is clear and addressing structural racism, including in medical journalism, is essential to improving health.

Change is a dynamic process and input is a key driver of change. Feedback from the readers of JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals is welcome, including comments, criticisms, and suggestions.

To best serve physicians, other health care professionals, patients, and the public, it is appropriate for all journals to prioritize commitments to equity, assess editorial culture, and execute needed changes. There is no greater calling for JAMA and the JAMA Network Journals, and for all medical publications, than advancing the science and art of medicine and the betterment of public health. Today, and for the future, these goals will be accomplished by championing diversity, equity, and inclusion in all aspects of clinical care, biomedical research, health policy, and society.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA (phil.fontanarosa@jamanetwork.org).

Published Online: June 3, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2927

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Additional Contributions: We acknowledge the leadership and accomplishments of Howard Bauchner, MD, for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion during his tenure as editor in chief of JAMA and the JAMA Network. We also thank other JAMA and JAMA Network editors and editorial staff, and JAMA editorial board members, L. Ebony Boulware, MD, MPH, Carlos del Rio, MD, and Raina M. Merchant, MD, MSHP, for providing suggestions and ideas to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion in the JAMA Network Journals.

Additional Information: This Editorial is being published simultaneously in JAMA and all JAMA Network Journals.

Articles on race, racism, and racial/ethnic disparities/inequities published in JAMA Network Journals during last 5 years. May 4, 2021. Accessed May 27, 2021. https://jamanetwork.com/DocumentLibrary/Race-Ethnicity-Articles-JAMANetwork-5Year.pdf
Fontanarosa  PB, Bauchner  H.  Race, ancestry, and medical research.   JAMA. 2018;320(15):1539-1540. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14438PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bauchner  H.  Race, poverty, and medicine in the United States.   JAMA. 2015;313(14):1423. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.2262PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yancy  CW, Bauchner  H.  Diversity in medical schools—need for a new bold approach.   JAMA. 2021;325(1):31-32. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23601PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jean-Jacques  M, Bauchner  H.  Vaccine distribution—equity left behind?   JAMA. 2021;325(9):829-830. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Rivara  FP, Fihn  SD.  Call for papers on prevention and the effects of systemic racism in health.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2016825. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16825PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ayanian  JZ, Buntin  MB.  In pursuit of a deeper understanding of racial justice and health equity.   JAMA Health Forum. 2020;1(6):e200765. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0765Google Scholar
Kibbe  MR, Freischlag  J.  Call to action to all surgery journal editors for diversity in the editorial and peer review process.   JAMA Surg. 2020;155(11):1015-1016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4549PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Flanagin  A, Frey  T, Christiansen  SL, Bauchner  H.  The reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals: comments invited.   JAMA. 2021;325(11):1049-1052. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.2104PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Royal Society of Chemistry. Joint commitment for action on inclusion and diversity in publishing. Accessed May 27, 2021. https://www.rsc.org/new-perspectives/talent/joint-commitment-for-action-inclusion-and-diversity-in-publishing/
3 Comments for this article
Your embrace of CRT and DEI spits in the face of Dr MLK Jr and the civil rights movement he inspired
James Padula, Physics chemistry UCD | Retired entrepreneur/ executive, political activist/ commentator
Dr King's dream of a color blind Society inspired millions into the civil rights movement to make profound, fundamental changes to US laws & regulations comprising the real systemic Racism that once existed in this country. As a result, Systemic Racism is now literally illegal and essentially non-existent except in the minds of the Marxists who developed critical theory and the bigotry of identity politics

As a scientist, I've witnessed the erosion of scientific rigor in various disciplines caused by a Postmodernist assault on reason that's insinuated itself into these disciplines, mainly in the form of Critical Race Theory

CRT is an ideology that's antithetical to the teachings of Dr MLK Jr and its claims to be the successor to this great man and his Civil Rights movement are duplicitous at best. In fact these lunatics refer to Dr King's color blind Society as a Racist construct. But this isn't surprising, it's just Marxists doing what Marxists do, they undermine the Social order and foment conflict
Has the leadership of the AMA no decency?
Paul Leber, MD | Neuro-Pharm Group, LLC
The basic tenets of our constitutional democratic republic are under attack by a mob of political activists largely comprised of self-serving social justice warriors. Its leaders claim that the structure of our society primarily serves the interests of white men of European origin and disadvantages those of people of color (POC). Ok, but where's the evidence to support this sweeping and eminently arguable allegation? Without question, the history of our country is marred by many shameful episodes of injustice based on skin color, religion, and ethnicity, but, today, where's the evidence of so-called "structural racism?" Political activist organizations like BLM argue the evidence abounds, citing the tendentious teachings of Critical Race Theory. A distinction exists, however, between unsubstantiated allegations advanced in a pollical manifesto and documented empirical evidence. America today is not a racist nation, at least not yet. In fact, POC enjoy benefits not accorded to others (e.g., affirmative action, college admission policies favoring POC over those of Asian or white European origin, special loan access, etc.) Why then did AMA leaders so readily capitulate to the assault on its Editors? Worse, rather than defending its staff and their right to express their personal views, the leadership of the AMA elected not just to endorse the defamatory and unjust allegations of the critics, but to act upon them. Shame on the AMAs leadership; have the leaders no decency?. Demands for 'equity' based on skin coloar are racist at their very core. Rights belong to individuals in a just society, not to individuals by dint of the groups to which they "belong."
AMA is abandoning "best possible" for "gender, sexual preference and racial equity"?!
James White |
I cannot help but worry that the AMA is currently in the process of becoming a Soviet style "Political Apparatchik" - an organ of the party.

This is both terrifying and, at the same time, humiliating to a nation based on equality for all.

Nobody cares what color a professional is, ALL anyone needs to know is that the very best were selected and they continue at the top of their game. All else is politics, racism and sexism and must be abandoned.

My transplant surgeon was a female pakistani muslim - and I didn't
care. My nephrologist is a white male first-generation of east european descent - and I don't care because both are top-of-profession experts.

If your top priority is "equity" then you must, by definition, place "care of patient" second. This is a direct violation of everything medicine, medical science and medical journalism should stand for.

I cannot protest enough. This is crimes-against-humanity level foolishness and it must stop immediately.