[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure.  Association of Antiparietal Cell Antibodies (APCAs) With Gastric Cancer (GC) by Anatomical Subsite and Helicobacter pylori Serostatus
Association of Antiparietal Cell Antibodies (APCAs) With Gastric Cancer (GC) by Anatomical Subsite and Helicobacter pylori Serostatus

Data are from the Finnish Maternity Cohort. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs are by unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age at sample. There were no APCA-seropositive individuals among H pylori–seropositive antrum, pylorus, and curvatures cases.

Table.  Association of APCA and AIFA Seropositivity With Gastric Cancer Overall and Stratified by Helicobacter pylori Serostatus
Association of APCA and AIFA Seropositivity With Gastric Cancer Overall and Stratified by Helicobacter pylori Serostatus
1.
Sung  H, Ferlay  J, Siegel  RL,  et al.  Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.   CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Blaser  MJ, Falkow  S.  What are the consequences of the disappearing human microbiota?   Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(12):887-894. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2245 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Botterweck  AA, Schouten  LJ, Volovics  A, Dorant  E, van Den Brandt  PA.  Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries.   Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(4):645-654. doi:10.1093/ije/29.4.645 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Sonnenberg  A.  Differences in the birth-cohort patterns of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer.   Gut. 2010;59(6):736-743. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.195008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Anderson  WF, Rabkin  CS, Turner  N, Fraumeni  JF  Jr, Rosenberg  PS, Camargo  MC.  The changing face of noncardia gastric cancer incidence among US non-Hispanic whites.   J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(6):608-615. doi:10.1093/jnci/djx262 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Neumann  WL, Coss  E, Rugge  M, Genta  RM.  Autoimmune atrophic gastritis—pathogenesis, pathology and management.   Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(9):529-541. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2013.101 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Toh  BH.  Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune gastritis.   Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(4-5):459-462. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.048 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Murphy  G, Dawsey  SM, Engels  EA,  et al.  Cancer risk after pernicious anemia in the US elderly population.   Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(13):2282-2289. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.040PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Song  H, Held  M, Sandin  S,  et al.  Increase in the prevalence of atrophic gastritis among adults age 35 to 44 years old in Northern Sweden between 1990 and 2009.   Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(9):1592-600. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rusak  E, Chobot  A, Krzywicka  A, Wenzlau  J.  Anti-parietal cell antibodies—diagnostic significance.   Adv Med Sci. 2016;61(2):175-179. doi:10.1016/j.advms.2015.12.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Annibale  B, Lahner  E, Fave  GD.  Diagnosis and management of pernicious anemia.   Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011;13(6):518-524. doi:10.1007/s11894-011-0225-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Lahner  E, Norman  GL, Severi  C,  et al.  Reassessment of intrinsic factor and parietal cell autoantibodies in atrophic gastritis with respect to cobalamin deficiency.   Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(8):2071-2079. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.231 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Antico  A, Tampoia  M, Villalta  D, Tonutti  E, Tozzoli  R, Bizzaro  N.  Clinical usefulness of the serological gastric biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic autoimmune gastritis.   Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:520970. doi:10.1155/2012/520970 PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Pukkala  E, Andersen  A, Berglund  G,  et al.  Nordic biological specimen banks as basis for studies of cancer causes and control—more than 2 million sample donors, 25 million person years and 100,000 prospective cancers.   Acta Oncol. 2007;46(3):286-307. doi:10.1080/02841860701203545 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lehtinen  M, Surcel  HM, Natunen  K, Pukkala  E, Dillner  J.  Cancer Registry follow-up for 17 million person-years of a nationwide maternity cohort.   Cancer Med. 2017;6(12):3060-3064. doi:10.1002/cam4.1222 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group.  The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers.   N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1029-1035. doi:10.1056/NEJM199404143301501 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Population. Statistics Finland. Updated November 3, 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://www.stat.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html.
18.
Burucoa  C, Delchier  JC, Courillon-Mallet  A,  et al.  Comparative evaluation of 29 commercial Helicobacter pylori serological kits.   Helicobacter. 2013;18(3):169-179. doi:10.1111/hel.12030 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Dahlqwist  E, Sjolander  A. Package ‘AF’: model-based estimation of confounder-adjusted attributable fractions, version 0.1.5. May 20, 2019. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AF/AF.pdf
20.
Vannella  L, Sbrozzi-Vanni  A, Lahner  E,  et al.  Development of type I gastric carcinoid in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis.   Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(12):1361-1369. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04659.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Weise  F, Vieth  M, Reinhold  D,  et al.  Gastric cancer in autoimmune gastritis: a case-control study from the German centers of the staR project on gastric cancer research.   United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8(2):175-184. doi:10.1177/2050640619891580 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Mahmud  N, Stashek  K, Katona  BW,  et al.  The incidence of neoplasia in patients with autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis: a renewed call for surveillance.   Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32(1):67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Vannella  L, Lahner  E, Osborn  J, Annibale  B.  Systematic review: gastric cancer incidence in pernicious anaemia.   Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(4):375-382. doi:10.1111/apt.12177 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Ito  M, Haruma  K, Kaya  S,  et al.  Role of anti-parietal cell antibody in Helicobacter pylori-associated atrophic gastritis: evaluation in a country of high prevalence of atrophic gastritis.   Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(3):287-293. doi:10.1080/003655202317284183 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Lo  CC, Hsu  PI, Lo  GH,  et al.  Implications of anti-parietal cell antibodies and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies in histological gastritis and patient outcome.   World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(30):4715-4720. doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i30.4715 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Song  IC, Lee  HJ, Kim  HJ,  et al.  A multicenter retrospective analysis of the clinical features of pernicious anemia in a Korean population.   J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(2):200-204. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.200 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Ungar  B, Strickland  RG, Francis  CM.  The prevalence and significance of circulating antibodies to gastric intrinsic factor and parietal cells in gastric carcinoma.   Gut. 1971;12(11):903-905. doi:10.1136/gut.12.11.903 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Wang  SM, Roth  MJ, Murphy  GA,  et al.  Serologic profile of antiparietal cell antibodies, pepsinogens, and H. pylori and risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer: a nested case-control study in China.   Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(12):2022-2029. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0512 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Bizzaro  N, Antico  A, Villalta  D.  Autoimmunity and gastric cancer.   Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):E377. doi:10.3390/ijms19020377 PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Cabrera de León  A, Almeida González  D, Almeida  AA,  et al.  Factors associated with parietal cell autoantibodies in the general population.   Immunol Lett. 2012;147(1-2):63-66. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2012.06.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Bani-Hani  KE.  Clinicopathological comparison between young and old age patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.   Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;35(1):43-52. doi:10.1385/IJGC:35:1:043 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Balucan  FS, Morshed  SA, Davies  TF.  Thyroid autoantibodies in pregnancy: their role, regulation and clinical relevance.   J Thyroid Res. 2013;2013:182472. doi:10.1155/2013/182472 PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Topping  J, Quenby  S, Farquharson  R, Malia  R, Greaves  M.  Marked variation in antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy: relationships to pregnancy outcome.   Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):224-228. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.224 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Boda  T, Ito  M, Yoshihara  M,  et al.  Advanced method for evaluation of gastric cancer risk by serum markers: determination of true low-risk subjects for gastric neoplasm.   Helicobacter. 2014;19(1):1-8. doi:10.1111/hel.12101 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Somers  EC, Thomas  SL, Smeeth  L, Hall  AJ.  Autoimmune diseases co-occurring within individuals and within families: a systematic review.   Epidemiology. 2006;17(2):202-217. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000193605.93416.df PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Laisk  T, Lepamets  M, Koel  M, Abner  E, Mägi  R; Estonian Biobank Research Team.  Genome-wide association study identifies five risk loci for pernicious anemia.   Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3761. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24051-6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Twito  O, Shapiro  Y, Golan-Cohen  A, Dickstein  Y, Ness-Abramof  R, Shapiro  M.  Anti-thyroid antibodies, parietal cell antibodies and tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease.   Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):516-520. doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.58743 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
AUTOIMMUNE ATROPHIC GASTRITIS AND ASSOCIATION WITH GASTRIC CANCERS
Valli De Re, PHD | Project manager Bio-proteomica, Immunopatologia e Biomarcatori Oncologici, Dipartimento di Ricerca e Diagnostica Avanzata dei Tumori, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Avi
We had developed a risk prediction model of high (≥2) Gastritis/Intestinal-Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) stage based on patient’s age, gastrin G17, and serum pepsinogen A (PG1) levels to find patients at risk for gastric cancer (GC) in a population at low/medium risk of gastric cancer (GC) 1. It is known that according to OLGIM staging, gastric biopsy showing a high OLGIM stage had an increased risk of GC2. In our model, high G17 level (> 66 pmol/l), first found patients with autoimmune chronic gastritis (ACG), and among them those with a low PG1 level (PG1≤23 μg/l) identified patients with a high OLGIM stage regardless of the patient's age. Additionally, we found that a high PG2 level associated with H. pylori infection 1. We re-analysis the same population and found association between high G17 level ACG with female sex and H. Pylori negative prevalence. In another series of GC cases we found an association between high G17 levels ACG, H-pylori negative antibodies and upper/middle tumor location, supporting the suggestion of M. Song and alt. 3 that ACG is associated with a distinct category of individuals at risk of GC. However, in a previous study we also showed that ACG condition was associated with other autoimmune diseases and gastric neuroendocrine tumor 4. Thus, overall our results suggested that yet undefined genetic factors are associated with a reduction in host immune control against phenotypically altered cells in ACG patients and this condition may be involved in the development of gastric adenocarcinoma but also of neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, we found that by high gastrin G17 level and a low PG1/PG2 ratio may distinguish patients with only ACG from those with ACG plus neuroendocrine tumor 4. Although more prospective studies needed to further support these findings, overall, results encourage to pay attention in patients with ACG not only for the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma but also for gastric neuroendocrine tumors and autoimmune disorders like thyroiditis and vitiligo. Finally, it will be interesting to evaluate Anti-parietal cell autoantibodies and Gastrin G17 plus PG1/PG2 ratio in a same population to verify if these makers could be used in cooperation to better find patients at risk for GC to undergo strict endoscopic follow-up, to help early GC diagnosis and intervention and therefore a better prognosis of GC.

1. De Re V, Orzes E, Canzonieri V, et al. Pepsinogens to Distinguish Patients With Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori Infection Among Populations at Risk for Gastric Cancer. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7:e183. doi:10.1038/ctg.2016.42

2. Yue H, Shan L, Bin L. The significance of OLGA and OLGIM staging systems in the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 2018;21(4):579-587. doi:10.1007/s10120-018-0812-3

3. Song M, Camargo MC, Katki HA, et al. Association of Antiparietal Cell and Anti-Intrinsic Factor Antibodies With Risk of Gastric Cancer. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5395

4. Magris R, De Re V, Maiero S, et al. Low Pepsinogen I/II Ratio and High Gastrin-17 Levels Typify Chronic Atrophic Autoimmune Gastritis Patients With Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;11(9):e00238. doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000238


Valli De Re, PhD1, Renato Cannizzaro, MD2, Agostino Steffan, MD1

1 Immunopatologia e Biomarcatori Oncologici, Dipartimento di Ricerca e Diagnostica Avanzata dei
Tumori, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
2 Gastroenterologia Oncologica, Centro
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Original Investigation
December 16, 2021

Association of Antiparietal Cell and Anti-Intrinsic Factor Antibodies With Risk of Gastric Cancer

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 2Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • 4Biobank Borealis of Northern Finland, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(2):268-274. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5395
Key Points

Question  Is there an association between autoantibodies to gastric mucosa and gastric cancer (GC)?

Findings  In this cohort study of 529 female matched pairs from the Finnish Maternity Cohort and 457 male matched pairs from the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study, prediagnostic seropositivity to antiparietal cell antibodies was associated with the elevated risk of GC among young women born in 1938 through 1989 during a median of 17 years follow-up but not among older men born in 1916 through 1939 during a median of 11 years follow-up. The magnitude of association was stronger in Helicobacter pylori–seronegative women and most pronounced for tumors in the corpus.

Meaning  With the waning prevalence of H pylori, autoimmune-driven GC may explain the recent rise of GC incidence among the younger female population.

Abstract

Importance  Autoimmune gastritis is an alternative cause of gastric carcinogenesis. This cause may be gaining importance with declining prevalence of chronic Helicobacter pylori infection.

Objective  To determine the association of prediagnostic autoantibodies to gastric mucosa with gastric cancer (GC) risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study used nested GC case-control analyses within separate Finnish cohorts of women of reproductive age (Finnish Maternity Cohort [FMC]; born 1938-1989) and older men (Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention [ATBC] Study; born 1916-1939). There were 529 and 457 matched pairs from the FMC and ATBC Study, respectively, with mean participant ages of 30.5 and 57.5 years and medians of 17 and 11 years from baseline to cancer diagnosis. Data analyses were performed between August 2019 and November 2020.

Exposures  Antiparietal cell antibodies (APCAs), anti-intrinsic factor antibodies, and anti–H pylori antibodies were measured in baseline serum using immunoassays.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Autoantibody associations were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

Results  Of the 529 control participants in the FMC and 457 control participants in the ATBC Study, 53 (10%) women and 35 (7.7%) men were APCA seropositive, respectively, whereas 146 (28%) women and 329 (72%) men were H pylori seropositive. In the FMC, APCA seropositivity was statistically significantly associated with GC risk among H pylori-seronegative women (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 3.16-9.64) but not H pylori-seropositive women (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.64-2.60; P for interaction = .002). The APCA association with H pylori seronegativity was strongest for tumors in the fundus and corpus (OR, 24.84; 95% CI, 8.49-72.72). In the ATBC Study, APCA seropositivity was not associated with GC among either H pylori–seronegative men (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.32-3.04) or H pylori–seropositive men (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60-1.88). In both cohorts, anti-intrinsic factor antibody seroprevalence was less than 2% among cases as well as controls and not statistically associated with GC risk.

Conclusions and Relevance  Results of this cohort study demonstrate that autoantibody positivity may reflect subclinical autoimmune gastritis in younger women. The findings among young females and corpus subsite align with increasing cancer incidence trends for these groups. Stronger autoimmune associations in H pylori-seronegative individuals support a model of autoimmune gastritis replacing H pylori as the driving factor.

Introduction

Despite decreasing incidence over the past 50 years, gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide.1 Helicobacter pylori is the primary risk factor for GC, and its prevalence has been declining.2 However, recent studies indicate that the epidemiology of GC is changing.3,4 Among US non-Hispanic White individuals younger than 50 years, noncardia GC increased 1.3% per year (1995-2013) despite an overall decrease in older age groups.5 The rising rates were stronger in counties with less than 20% prevalence of poverty, suggesting that the trends may be driven by factors other than H pylori, which is less prevalent among affluent individuals. The largest increase was observed for gastric corpus tumors in women. The corpus is the anatomical location where autoimmune-type gastritis is dominant.6 These observations—female sex, affluent population, corpus-dominant features—invite speculation that increasing prevalence of autoimmune gastritis (AIG) may be a plausible explanation for these unfavorable cancer trends.

Autoimmune gastritis is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease that replaces gastric parietal cells by atrophic and metaplastic mucosa.7 The destruction of parietal cells leads to reduced or absent production of acid and intrinsic factor. The resulting malabsorption and consequent vitamin B12 deficiency manifests clinically as pernicious anemia (PA), which is associated with GC.8 Patients with AIG are often asymptomatic, and when presenting with anemia they may be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed owing to insufficient endoscopic biopsies and/or failure to explore for the underlying cause of anemia.7

The disappearance of ancestral constituents of the microbiota owing to improved hygiene, antibiotic pressure, and smaller family sizes is a hypothesized contributor to contemporary increases in certain autoimmune and allergic conditions.2 Similarly, incidence of AIG might also be on the rise. Notably, prevalence of atrophic corpus gastritis in Sweden among individuals aged 35 to 44 years nearly tripled between 1990 and 2009.9

Diagnosis of AIG is supported by the detection of gastric autoantibodies. Antiparietal cell antibodies (APCAs) are antibodies against gastric proton pump and are detected in approximately 90% of patients with PA.10 Anti-intrinsic factor antibodies (AIFAs) target proteins necessary for vitamin B12 absorption and are present in approximately 80% of patients with PA.11 For detecting atrophic gastritis, AIFAs are more specific than APCAs (100% vs 90%), but sensitivity is low (37% vs 81%),12 rising during disease progression.13 In this cohort study, we hypothesized that presence of these autoantibodies may represent asymptomatic AIG and evaluated them as potential predictive markers for GC risk.

Methods
Study Population

Participants with GC and controls were identified from 2 prospective population-based cohorts. The Finnish Maternity Cohort (FMC) was established in 1983 by the National Public Health Institute of Finland based on prenatal blood samples collected to screen for congenital infections and rubella immunity.14 This collection comprises 2 million first-trimester serum samples from 1 million women, covering approximately 94% of all Finnish pregnant women.15 Samples of 2 mL of serum were stored as 1 aliquot at −25 °C in a single storage place. Incident cancers were identified through record linkage with the nationwide Finish Cancer Registry through December 2014.

The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study was designed as a randomized prevention trial of vitamin supplementation for primary prevention of cancers in male smokers aged 50 to 69 years who were recruited from 1985 through 1988 in Finland.16 Fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and stored in serum aliquots at −70 °C until testing. Participants were followed up for cancer incidence using the Finnish Cancer Registry through December 2016. Data analyses were performed between August 2019 and November 2020.

Diagnoses of GC were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) (ATBC) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) (FMC), grouped by anatomical subsites as cardia (ICD-9, 151.0; ICD-10, C16.0); fundus and corpus (ICD-9, 151.1-151.2; ICD-10, C16.1-C16.2); antrum, pylorus, lesser curvature, and greater curvature (ICD-9, 151.3-151.6; ICD-10, C16.3-C16.6); and overlapping and unspecified (ICD-9, 151.8-151.9; ICD-10, C16.8-C16.9). Finnish law does not allow registration of race or ethnicity. According to official national statistics, 93% of Finland’s population are of Finnish and/or Swedish ancestry.17 All participants provided written informed consent. The FMC has a separate legal basis for the collection and scientific use by the law of the National Institute for Health and Welfare (668/2008). The original ATBC Study was approved by the institutional review boards of both the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki, Finland.

Case-Control Selection

In the FMC, a total of 527 women with GC had baseline serum samples available. For each case, 1 control who had remained alive and free of GC for an equal or greater length of follow-up was randomly selected, matched for age at serum sampling (±2 years) and length of serum storage (±2 months). If a woman had more than 1 available sample preceding the index diagnosis, the earliest pregnancy sample was selected for the study. To assess longitudinal change in autoantibody levels, a serial sample from subsequent pregnancies collected more than 8 years after the first sample was selected for 35 women with GC and 35 controls. The median (range) interval between collection of the 2 samples was 10 (8-23) years.

In the ATBC Study, 457 men with GC who had available baseline serum samples were selected and matched for 1 control per case using incidence density sampling. Randomly selected controls were matched to men with GC by age at randomization (±1 year) and serum draw date (±30 days).

Laboratory Methods

The IgG APCAs and AIFAs were analyzed using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (IBL International GmbH). Anti–H pylori whole-cell IgG antibody was tested by ELISA kits from IBL International GmbH for FMC samples and from Biohit Healthcare for ATBC Study samples. Both of these assays have comparable high sensitivity and specificity.18 For IBL International GmbH products, qualitative results were determined from the cutoff index calculated as the optical density of the sample divided by the mean optical density of the cutoff standard, with a cutoff index of 1 or greater considered seropositive. Quantitative autoantibody levels were estimated using a standard curve established with 6 standard calibrator samples of known concentration (U/mL) using log-linear coordinates and 4-parameter fit. Matched case-control samples and longitudinal samples of a given individual were placed in the same plate. All laboratory analyses were conducted at the University of Oulu in Finland and blinded to case-control status.

Quality Control

To assess reproducibility, a subset of samples from the first run of each study set was retested for APCAs (FMC, 143; ATBC, 97) and AIFAs (FMC, 49; ATBC, 21). Samples were selected based on a random 50% of those with initial values that were greater than 1.2 times the cutoff, an equal number of samples that were less than 0.8 times the cutoff, and all samples that were between 0.8 and 1.2 times the cutoff. For APCAs, the resulting coefficients of variation were 6% and 7%, and intraclass correlations were 98% and 92% based on FMC and ATBC Study samples, respectively, whereas the corresponding numbers for AIFAs were 11%, 8%, 96%, and 98% respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Differences between groups for categorical variables were assessed by χ2 tests. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for each antibody association with GC. Unconditional logistic regression models were used for subgroup analyses by H pylori serostatus and by tumor subsite. Tests for interaction were conducted using multiplicative interaction terms in the regression models. The P value for heterogeneity between subsites was calculated using Q-statistics. All models were adjusted for age at baseline, and ATBC models were additionally adjusted for trial supplementation group, decided a priori for a parsimonious model. Differences between quantitative antibody levels for serial samples were assessed using the paired t test. Population attributable risk (PAR) and 95% CIs were calculated using function AFclogit for matched case-control set analysis and AFglm for unmatched analyses from R package AF, version 0.1.5 (R Foundation).19 These functions estimate the attributable fraction for binary outcomes under the hypothetical scenario where a binary exposure is eliminated from the population. All other analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Inc), and statistical significance was based on 2-sided P < .05.

Results
Baseline Characteristics

Within each cohort, cases and controls were similar at the time of blood collection (eTable in the Supplement). The median (IQR) interval from blood sample to diagnosis was 17.4 (10.2-23.3) years for FMC cases and 11.0 (6.0-18.0) years for ATBC Study cases. Participants in the FMC were substantially younger than participants in the ATBC Study at time of blood collection (mean [SD] age, 30.5 [5.9] vs 57.5 [4.9] years; P < .001); participants with GC in the FMC were younger than in the ATBC Study at diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 47.4 [9.8] vs 69.5 [7.5] years; P < .001). The 2 cohorts had considerable overlap in time periods of sample collection and cancer diagnosis but represented nearly distinct birth cohorts: post-1940 vs pre-1940.

Antibody Associations With GC

In both cohorts, baseline H pylori seroprevalence was higher among GC cases than controls: 394 of 529 (74.5%) vs 146 of 529 (27.6%), respectively, for the FMC, and 399 of 457 (87.3%) vs 329 of 457 (72.0%), respectively, for the ATBC Study (Table). The ORs for the association of H pylori seropositivity with cancer risk were 7.38 (95% CI, 5.28-10.31) in the FMC and 2.81 (95% CI, 1.95-4.06) in the ATBC Study.

In the FMC, baseline APCA seropositivity was higher among GC cases (93 of 529 [17.6%]) than controls (53 of 529 [10.0%]), with an OR of 1.85 (95% CI, 1.30-2.64). Stratified by H pylori serostatus, the association was statistically significantly stronger in H pylori–seronegative women (OR, 5.52 [95% CI, 3.16-9.64]) than in H pylori–seropositive women (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.64-2.60]; P = .002). However, baseline APCA seropositivity (cases, 33 of 457 [7.2%]; controls, 35 of 457 [7.7%]) was not associated with GC risk in the ATBC Study overall (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.60-1.62]), nor separately among men who were H pylori seronegative (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.32-3.04]) or H pylori seropositive (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.60-1.88]).

In both cohorts, baseline AIFA seroprevalence was less than 2% among both GC cases and controls, and ORs for association were not statistically significant. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant AIFA associations for strata defined by H pylori serostatus in either cohort.

Antibody Associations With GC Subsites by H pylori Seroprevalence in the FMC

For both H pylori serostatus strata, the strongest association was observed for cancers of the fundus and corpus, which represented 70 of 529 (13.2%) GCs (Figure). While both ORs were considerably elevated, the increase was nearly an order of magnitude greater for H pylori–seronegative individuals than for H pylori–seropositive individuals (24.84 vs 2.64; P for interaction = .001). The APCA association among H pylori–seronegative individuals with antrum, pylorus, and curvatures subsites was not statistically significant (OR, 3.27 [95% CI, 0.83-12.86]).

In addition, among H pylori–negative individuals, the APCA association with fundus and corpus was statistically significantly different from the association with antrum, pylorus, and curvatures (24.84 vs 3.27;P for heterogeneity = .02). In an extreme hypothetical scenario of redistributing all overlapping and nonspecified tumors to antrum, pylorus, and curvature subsites, this difference remains with an OR of 5.03 (95% CI, 2.93-8.64; P for heterogeneity = .01).

Seroprevalence by Birth Cohort in the FMC

Seropositivity against H pylori gradually declined in successive birth cohorts (pre-1950 and post-1970) among both cases (59 of 68 [86.8%] to 32 of 44 [72.7%], respectively) and controls (29 of 70 [41.4%] to 11 of 43 [25.6%], respectively). In contrast, APCA seroprevalence increased over time among cases (11 of 68 [16.2%] to 10 of 44 [22.7%], respectively) and did not appreciably change among controls (7 of 70 [10.0%] to 4 of 43 [9.3%], respectively) (eFigure 1 in the Supplement).

Longitudinal Change of APCAs in the FMC

Quantitative APCA levels were relatively unchanged between paired samples obtained 8 to 23 years apart, except for 3 individuals (mean, 6.2 U/mL vs 6.1 U/mL; P = .99; eFigure 2 in the Supplement). Two of these individuals were seropositive cases who nominally seroreverted with levels near the cutoff at both time points, while 1 was a seroconverting control with a large magnitude increase.

Population-Attributable Fraction of APCAs in the FMC

The estimated PAR from APCAs among H pylori–seronegative individuals was 32.4% (95% CI, 21.6%-43.1%). This accounts for 8.1% (95% CI, 4.2%-12.0%) of GC overall.

Discussion

In this large, prospective cohort study with a long follow-up, APCA seropositivity was associated with subsequent development of GC in women born since 1938. The strength of association was restricted to H pylori–seronegative women with the highest OR for fundus and corpus tumors. In the comparative cohort of older men, APCA and AIFA seropositivity were not associated with GC regardless of H pylori serostatus. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to quantify the PAR for AIG in gastric carcinogenesis.

Autoimmune gastritis is a well-recognized precursor of PA and may develop into GC, but its quantitative contribution to GC in the general population is unknown. Previous studies based on histology rather than serology had small sample sizes.20-22 Studies reporting GC associations with AIG were actually investigations of PA.23 Moreover, PA diagnoses were based on questionnaire or vitamin B12 deficiency, which invites questions about validity, including possible causes of vitamin B12 deficiency other than AIG.

Both APCAs and AIFAs have been used to explore the pathologic sequence leading to GC. Cross-sectional analyses found higher APCA levels associated with either histologically confirmed corpus atrophy or serologic atrophy.24,25 Retrospective studies have examined APCA and AIFA seropositivity in patients with PA.26 The few case-control studies investigating autoantibody levels with GC had controversial results. A study comparing patients with GC with healthy controls found no association of APCAs and AIFAs with GC,27 whereas another found higher APCA seroprevalence in patients with GC compared with healthy controls.25 One prospective study from China (an endemic area of cardia GC and esophageal cancer) reported an inverse association of APCAs with cardia adenocarcinoma and no statistically significant association with noncardia GC, contrary to expectation.28

We demonstrated an independent association of AIG with GC. The effect modification by H pylori status suggests existence of 2 sets of cases with differing causes. The association of APCAs with GC was most pronounced for cancers of the fundus and corpus, where targets of APCAs are mainly located.6,7 These 2 related observations support interpretation of APCAs as reflecting autoimmune corpus restricted–type atrophy that leads to GC development.

Lack of association in the ATBC Study may be because of the overall low prevalence of autoantibodies in this population. Like other autoimmune disorders, AIG is also known to be less prevalent in men.29 Cigarette smoking is inversely associated with prevalence of APCAs.30 Conceivably, the men in the ATBC Study, who were all smokers, may have had lower APCA prevalence than nonsmoking men. Further adjustment of the present statistical models by cigarette pack-years did not change the findings. Considering the increasing secular trends in autoimmune diseases,9 the later birth years of the women in the FMC may have contributed to their higher prevalence of autoantibodies as compared with the men in the ATBC Study. Furthermore, the mean age at diagnosis of cases in the FMC was lower than the cases in the ATBC Study, consistent with the relatively younger age distribution of AIG-associated GC.31

To our knowledge, there are no data about associated levels of APCAs and AIFAs, but other autoantibodies have been reported to change during pregnancy. Antithyroid antibodies are noted to decrease,32 whereas antiphospholipid antibodies increase in pregnancy.33 While pregnancy may alter APCAs and AIFAs, we do not have a presumption about the direction of change. Because we are matching for gestation, the mean effect of pregnancy at a given duration should be canceled out in case-control comparisons. Most baseline measurements were from first pregnancies. In follow-up pregnancies, most women had unchanged autoantibody levels.

The AIFA seroprevalence was low in both the FMC and ATBC Study. The AIFAs are known to be less sensitive and more specific in detecting AIG.12,13 Although the prevalence of AIFAs was too low in these healthy individuals to have enough statistical power, the direction of association was positive in both cohorts.

This study has several strengths. First, the FMC is a unique population-based cohort that covers the age and birth-year range of our interest. Most prospective cohort studies targeting chronic disease outcomes, such as cardiovascular events or cancer, enroll participants around middle age. Median age at onset of PA is 30 to 39 years old, implying onset of AIG that precedes this age range. Although we could not include a contemporaneous group of men, evaluating men from an earlier period was informative to show their contrasting absence of an autoantibody-GC association. Second, to our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study investigating the association of autoantibodies with GC risk. Third, we had serial samples from the same individuals over a long period of time to assess the change in antibody levels. Notably, the autoantibody levels did not change over time, supportive of the robustness of the present findings. Similarly, in a study of a Japanese population, long-term administration of proton pump inhibitors and H pylori eradication did not influence APCA levels.24 The 2 seropositive cases in the present study that nominally seroreverted may have lost quantitative levels owing to disease progression to severe atrophic gastritis,34 while the 1 control with seroconversion may have developed AIG later in life. Fourth, using a commercial ELISA for autoantibody detection with high reproducibility allows for replication in other studies.

Limitations

Nevertheless, this study has some limitations. We did not have information on H pylori eradication therapy or other medication use that could influence GC risk. However, we found a strong association of H pylori seropositivity with GC. Autoantibody seropositivity may not necessarily imply existence of an underlying clinical disease. Autoimmune conditions frequently co-occur,35-37 and APCAs and AIFAs may be found in other autoimmune diseases or even in healthy people.10 It is currently unknown whether these autoantibodies have a pathophysiologic role outside of the stomach or reflect underdiagnosed AIG accompanying other autoimmune disorders. Anatomical subsite was classified as overlapping or unspecified for a large proportion of cases. Because there is no differential clinical management based on subsite, this variable should not have biased the results. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis assuming all overlapping and nonspecified cases were antrum, pylorus, and curvature tumors did not eliminate the preferential association with the fundus and corpus subsites. Furthermore, we did not have any clinical information with regard to clinical stage or histology of the cancer cases, nor were we able to assess precancerous endoscopic findings to assess the degree of gastric atrophy.

Future studies should incorporate more diverse populations and birth cohorts. While this study demonstrates association of antibodies with disease, follow-up serosurveys are needed to determine whether antibody prevalence has increased over time. Although autoantibody prevalence did not change much among controls, this study suggests a relative increasing trend of autoantibody-associated GC cases in contrast with decreasing H pylori–associated GC cases in later years. These complementary findings provide a clue that autoimmune-driven GC may be replacing H pylori–driven GCs. With decreasing H pylori prevalence in the general population, it seems likely that autoimmune-driven cases will determine future trends in GC incidence.

Conclusions

Increasing trends among younger generations portend future rises in GC incidence overall. In this cohort study, we tested a novel but plausible etiologic explanation for this alarming trend. The use of prediagnostic biospecimens avoids potential disease bias that would result from a cross-sectional comparison and ensures validity of any detected associations. Wider assessment of autoantibodies in patients with gastritis or GC may uncover a hidden cause for strategies to reduce the public health burden of GC.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: July 27, 2021.

Published Online: December 16, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5395

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Song M et al. JAMA Oncology.

Corresponding Author: Minkyo Song, MD, PhD, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, 6E204, Bethesda, MD 20892-9776 (minkyo.song@nih.gov).

Author Contributions: Drs Song and Rabkin had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Song, Camargo, Katki, Rabkin.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Song, Camargo, Rabkin.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Song, Camargo, Katki, Surcel, Rabkin.

Obtained funding: Rabkin.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Song, Weinstein, Männistö, Albanes, Surcel, Rabkin.

Supervision: Song, Camargo, Rabkin.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National Cancer Institute had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: We thank Joakim Dillner, MD, PhD, at the Department of Medical Microbiology of Lund University in Malmö, Sweden for his helpful advice on the article. He was not compensated for his contributions.

References
1.
Sung  H, Ferlay  J, Siegel  RL,  et al.  Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.   CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Blaser  MJ, Falkow  S.  What are the consequences of the disappearing human microbiota?   Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(12):887-894. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2245 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Botterweck  AA, Schouten  LJ, Volovics  A, Dorant  E, van Den Brandt  PA.  Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries.   Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(4):645-654. doi:10.1093/ije/29.4.645 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Sonnenberg  A.  Differences in the birth-cohort patterns of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer.   Gut. 2010;59(6):736-743. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.195008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Anderson  WF, Rabkin  CS, Turner  N, Fraumeni  JF  Jr, Rosenberg  PS, Camargo  MC.  The changing face of noncardia gastric cancer incidence among US non-Hispanic whites.   J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(6):608-615. doi:10.1093/jnci/djx262 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Neumann  WL, Coss  E, Rugge  M, Genta  RM.  Autoimmune atrophic gastritis—pathogenesis, pathology and management.   Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(9):529-541. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2013.101 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Toh  BH.  Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune gastritis.   Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(4-5):459-462. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.048 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Murphy  G, Dawsey  SM, Engels  EA,  et al.  Cancer risk after pernicious anemia in the US elderly population.   Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(13):2282-2289. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.040PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Song  H, Held  M, Sandin  S,  et al.  Increase in the prevalence of atrophic gastritis among adults age 35 to 44 years old in Northern Sweden between 1990 and 2009.   Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(9):1592-600. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rusak  E, Chobot  A, Krzywicka  A, Wenzlau  J.  Anti-parietal cell antibodies—diagnostic significance.   Adv Med Sci. 2016;61(2):175-179. doi:10.1016/j.advms.2015.12.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Annibale  B, Lahner  E, Fave  GD.  Diagnosis and management of pernicious anemia.   Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011;13(6):518-524. doi:10.1007/s11894-011-0225-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Lahner  E, Norman  GL, Severi  C,  et al.  Reassessment of intrinsic factor and parietal cell autoantibodies in atrophic gastritis with respect to cobalamin deficiency.   Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(8):2071-2079. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.231 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Antico  A, Tampoia  M, Villalta  D, Tonutti  E, Tozzoli  R, Bizzaro  N.  Clinical usefulness of the serological gastric biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic autoimmune gastritis.   Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:520970. doi:10.1155/2012/520970 PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Pukkala  E, Andersen  A, Berglund  G,  et al.  Nordic biological specimen banks as basis for studies of cancer causes and control—more than 2 million sample donors, 25 million person years and 100,000 prospective cancers.   Acta Oncol. 2007;46(3):286-307. doi:10.1080/02841860701203545 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lehtinen  M, Surcel  HM, Natunen  K, Pukkala  E, Dillner  J.  Cancer Registry follow-up for 17 million person-years of a nationwide maternity cohort.   Cancer Med. 2017;6(12):3060-3064. doi:10.1002/cam4.1222 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group.  The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers.   N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1029-1035. doi:10.1056/NEJM199404143301501 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Population. Statistics Finland. Updated November 3, 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://www.stat.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html.
18.
Burucoa  C, Delchier  JC, Courillon-Mallet  A,  et al.  Comparative evaluation of 29 commercial Helicobacter pylori serological kits.   Helicobacter. 2013;18(3):169-179. doi:10.1111/hel.12030 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Dahlqwist  E, Sjolander  A. Package ‘AF’: model-based estimation of confounder-adjusted attributable fractions, version 0.1.5. May 20, 2019. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AF/AF.pdf
20.
Vannella  L, Sbrozzi-Vanni  A, Lahner  E,  et al.  Development of type I gastric carcinoid in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis.   Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(12):1361-1369. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04659.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Weise  F, Vieth  M, Reinhold  D,  et al.  Gastric cancer in autoimmune gastritis: a case-control study from the German centers of the staR project on gastric cancer research.   United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8(2):175-184. doi:10.1177/2050640619891580 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Mahmud  N, Stashek  K, Katona  BW,  et al.  The incidence of neoplasia in patients with autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis: a renewed call for surveillance.   Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32(1):67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Vannella  L, Lahner  E, Osborn  J, Annibale  B.  Systematic review: gastric cancer incidence in pernicious anaemia.   Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(4):375-382. doi:10.1111/apt.12177 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Ito  M, Haruma  K, Kaya  S,  et al.  Role of anti-parietal cell antibody in Helicobacter pylori-associated atrophic gastritis: evaluation in a country of high prevalence of atrophic gastritis.   Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(3):287-293. doi:10.1080/003655202317284183 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Lo  CC, Hsu  PI, Lo  GH,  et al.  Implications of anti-parietal cell antibodies and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies in histological gastritis and patient outcome.   World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(30):4715-4720. doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i30.4715 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Song  IC, Lee  HJ, Kim  HJ,  et al.  A multicenter retrospective analysis of the clinical features of pernicious anemia in a Korean population.   J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(2):200-204. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.200 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Ungar  B, Strickland  RG, Francis  CM.  The prevalence and significance of circulating antibodies to gastric intrinsic factor and parietal cells in gastric carcinoma.   Gut. 1971;12(11):903-905. doi:10.1136/gut.12.11.903 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Wang  SM, Roth  MJ, Murphy  GA,  et al.  Serologic profile of antiparietal cell antibodies, pepsinogens, and H. pylori and risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer: a nested case-control study in China.   Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(12):2022-2029. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0512 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Bizzaro  N, Antico  A, Villalta  D.  Autoimmunity and gastric cancer.   Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):E377. doi:10.3390/ijms19020377 PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Cabrera de León  A, Almeida González  D, Almeida  AA,  et al.  Factors associated with parietal cell autoantibodies in the general population.   Immunol Lett. 2012;147(1-2):63-66. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2012.06.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Bani-Hani  KE.  Clinicopathological comparison between young and old age patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.   Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;35(1):43-52. doi:10.1385/IJGC:35:1:043 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Balucan  FS, Morshed  SA, Davies  TF.  Thyroid autoantibodies in pregnancy: their role, regulation and clinical relevance.   J Thyroid Res. 2013;2013:182472. doi:10.1155/2013/182472 PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Topping  J, Quenby  S, Farquharson  R, Malia  R, Greaves  M.  Marked variation in antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy: relationships to pregnancy outcome.   Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):224-228. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.224 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Boda  T, Ito  M, Yoshihara  M,  et al.  Advanced method for evaluation of gastric cancer risk by serum markers: determination of true low-risk subjects for gastric neoplasm.   Helicobacter. 2014;19(1):1-8. doi:10.1111/hel.12101 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Somers  EC, Thomas  SL, Smeeth  L, Hall  AJ.  Autoimmune diseases co-occurring within individuals and within families: a systematic review.   Epidemiology. 2006;17(2):202-217. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000193605.93416.df PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Laisk  T, Lepamets  M, Koel  M, Abner  E, Mägi  R; Estonian Biobank Research Team.  Genome-wide association study identifies five risk loci for pernicious anemia.   Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3761. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24051-6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Twito  O, Shapiro  Y, Golan-Cohen  A, Dickstein  Y, Ness-Abramof  R, Shapiro  M.  Anti-thyroid antibodies, parietal cell antibodies and tissue transglutaminase antibodies in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease.   Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):516-520. doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.58743 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×