[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.173.45. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Figure.
Enrollment of Patients in a Trial of Interventions to Improve Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery
Enrollment of Patients in a Trial of Interventions to Improve Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery
Table 1.  
Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Interventions to Promote Postoperative Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery in Guangdong (GD) and Guangxi (GX) Provinces, China
Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Interventions to Promote Postoperative Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery in Guangdong (GD) and Guangxi (GX) Provinces, China
Table 2.  
Additional Factors Potentially Associated With Postoperative Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery
Additional Factors Potentially Associated With Postoperative Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Follow-up After Glaucoma Surgery
Table 3.  
Observed Proportion of Patients Followed up at Study Time Points After Surgery
Observed Proportion of Patients Followed up at Study Time Points After Surgery
Table 4.  
Intention-to-Treat Analysis of Potential Determinants of 1-Month Follow-up Rate in the 209 Study Patients
Intention-to-Treat Analysis of Potential Determinants of 1-Month Follow-up Rate in the 209 Study Patients
1.
Bourne  RR, Stevens  GA, White  RA,  et al; Vision Loss Expert Group.  Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.  Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):e339-e349.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Tham  YC, Li  X, Wong  TY, Quigley  HA, Aung  T, Cheng  CY.  Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Xu  L, Wang  Y, Li  Y,  et al.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing: the Beijing Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1134.e1-1134.e11.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Liang  YB, Friedman  DS, Wong  TY,  et al; Handan Eye Study Group.  Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1965-1972.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Huang  S, Zheng  Y, Foster  PJ, Huang  W, He  M; Liwan Eye Study.  Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Chinese adults in urban southern China.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10):1362-1367.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Nayak  B, Gupta  S, Kumar  G, Dada  T, Gupta  V, Sihota  R.  Socioeconomics of long-term glaucoma therapy in India.  Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(1):20-24.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Congdon  NG, Krishnadas  R, Friedman  DS,  et al.  A study of initial therapy for glaucoma in southern India: India Glaucoma Outcomes and Treatment (INGOT) Study.  Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(3):149-158.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Liang  YB, Wang  NL, Rong  SS, Thomas  R.  Initial treatment for primary angle-closure glaucoma in China.  J Glaucoma. 2015;24(6):469-473.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Yang  K, Jin  L, Li  L,  et al.  Preoperative characteristics and compliance with follow-up after trabeculectomy surgery in rural southern China [published online April 12, 2016].  Br J Ophthalmol.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Liu  K, Rong  S, Liang  Y,  et al.  A retrospective survey of long-term follow-up on primary angle closure glaucoma after trabeculectomy [in Chinese].  Ophthalmol China. 2011;20:50-53.Google Scholar
11.
Jin  QX, Li  JQ, Lin  WJ,  et al.  Investigation and analysis on the causes of failing in follow-up after antiglaucoma operation [in Chinese].  J Clin Ophthalmol. 2006;14:516-518.Google Scholar
12.
Pizzi  LT, Zangalli  CS, Murchison  AP,  et al.  Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes and costs of two eyecare adherence interventions in diabetes patients.  Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(2):253-263.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Wikipedia. List of countries by number of mobile phones in use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use. Accessed October 17, 2014.
14.
Krishna  S, Boren  SA, Balas  EA.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review.  Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(3):231-240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Strandbygaard  U, Thomsen  SF, Backer  V.  A daily SMS reminder increases adherence to asthma treatment: a three-month follow-up study.  Respir Med. 2010;104(2):166-171.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Lester  RT, Ritvo  P, Mills  EJ,  et al.  Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1838-1845.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Lin  H, Chen  W, Luo  L,  et al.  Effectiveness of a short message reminder in increasing compliance with pediatric cataract treatment: a randomized trial.  Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2463-2470.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Singh  J, Bell  RW, Adams  A, O’Brien  C.  Enhancement of post trabeculectomy bleb formation by laser suture lysis.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(7):624-627.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Henderer  JD, Heeg  MC, Spaeth  GL,  et al.  A randomized trial of the long-term effects of digital ocular compression in the late postoperative period.  J Glaucoma. 2001;10(4):266-270.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
clinicaltrials.gov. Effect of SMS Reminder and Free Eye Drops on Follow-up Adherence After Trabeculectomy Surgery in Rural China. NCT02328456. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02328456. Accessed May 23, 2016.
21.
World Medical Association.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.  JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Royston  P.  Multiple imputation of missing values.  Stata J. 2004;4(2):227-241.Google Scholar
23.
Prum  BE, Rosenberg  LF, Gedde  SJ,  et al.  Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines.  Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41-P111.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Dan  A, Raubvogel  G, Chen  T,  et al.  The impact of multimedia education on uptake of comprehensive eye examinations in rural China: a randomized, controlled trial.  Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(4):283-290.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Liu  T, Congdon  N, Yan  X,  et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of an intervention promoting cataract surgery acceptance in rural China: the Guangzhou Uptake of Surgery Trial (GUSTO).  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5271-5278.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Congdon  N, Li  L, Zhang  M,  et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention to promote spectacle use in rural China: the see well to learn well study.  Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2343-2350.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Yan  X, Liu  T, Gruber  L, He  M, Congdon  N.  Attitudes of physicians, patients, and village health workers toward glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy in rural China: a focus group study.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):761-770.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Ma  X, Zhou  Z, Yi  H,  et al.  Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial.  BMJ. 2014;349:g5740.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Haynes  RB, Ackloo  E, Sahota  N, McDonald  HP, Yao  X.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16(2):CD000011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Lee  BW, Sathyan  P, John  RK, Singh  K, Robin  AL.  Predictors of and barriers associated with poor follow-up in patients with glaucoma in South India.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(10):1448-1454.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Yin  Q, Hu  A, Liang  Y,  et al.  A two-site, population-based study of barriers to cataract surgery in rural china.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1069-1075.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
October 2016

Interventions to Promote Follow-up After Trabeculectomy Surgery in Rural Southern China: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
  • 3Yizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yizhou, China
  • 4ORBIS International, New York, New York
  • 5TREE Centre, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(10):1135-1141. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2819
Key Points

Question  Can free medications and text message reminders improve adherence to follow-up after glaucoma surgery in rural China?

Findings  This randomized clinical trial of 209 patients found that text message reminders significantly improved postoperative follow-up at 1 month. In addition, being told to return for suture removal had a further impact, with increased return rates among individuals requiring suture removal.

Meaning  Low-cost interventions may improve postoperative follow-up significantly after glaucoma surgery in rural China, providing opportunities for interventions to improve surgical success.

Abstract

Importance  Follow-up after trabeculectomy surgery is important to surgical success, but little is known about the effect of interventions on improving follow-up in low-resource areas.

Objective  To examine whether text message reminders and free eye medications improve follow-up after trabeculectomy in rural southern China.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This randomized clinical trial studied 222 consecutive patients undergoing trabeculectomy from October 1, 2014, through November 31, 2015, at 4 rural hospitals in Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces, China. Data from the intention-to-treat population were analyzed.

Interventions  Patients undergoing trabeculectomy were randomized (1:1) to receive text message reminders 3 days before appointments at 1 and 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery and free topical corticosteroid medication (US$5.30) at each visit or to standard follow-up without reminders or free medication.

Main Outcomes and Measure  Follow-up at 1 month postoperatively.

Results  Among 222 eligible patients, 13 (5.9%) refused and 209 (94.1%) were enrolled, with 106 (50.7%) randomized to the intervention group (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [12.7] years; 56 women [52.8%]) and 103 (49.3%) to the control group (mean [SD] age, 63.0 [12.7] years; 53 women [51.5%]). A total of 6 patients (2.9%) were unavailable for follow-up. Attendance at 1 month for the intervention group (59 of 102 [57.8%]) was significantly higher than for the control group (34 of 101 [33.7%]) (unadjusted relative risk [RR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.63; P = .01). Factors associated with 1-month attendance in multiple regression models included intervention group membership (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.53; P = .02) and being told to return for suture removal (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.06-3.06; P = .03). One-month attendance among controls not told about suture removal was 3 of 31 (9.7%), whereas it was 44 of 68 (64.7%) among the intervention group with suture removal (unadjusted RR, 6.69; 95% CI, 2.08-21.6; P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance  In this setting, low-cost interventions may significantly improve postoperative follow-up after glaucoma surgery, a potential opportunity for interventions known to improve surgical success.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02328456

Introduction

Glaucoma is the third leading cause of blindness worldwide after cataract and uncorrected refractive error,1 and China is no exception, with 7.7% to 11% of blindness attributable to glaucoma.2-5 Although medical treatment for glaucoma remains a common first-line option in developed areas, lack of availability and cost of medications make this modality less practical6 in areas of limited resources. For these reasons, glaucoma surgery, such as trabeculectomy, may be preferred7,8 as initial treatment for glaucoma in rural areas of lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, poor adherence to follow-up after trabeculectomy surgery may interfere with appropriate postoperative management. Previous work in rural southern China9 found that only a quarter of patients returned a month after glaucoma surgery, with other studies in China10,11 and India7 also documenting poor follow-up after trabeculectomy. There is an urgent need for strategies to increase adherence in LMICs to improve surgical outcomes.

Traditional reminder methods, such as telephone calls and posted letters, have high unit costs and require significant resources to administer.12 The number of Chinese cell phone users now exceeds 1.3 billion, giving China the largest cohort of users in the world.13 Short message service (SMS) text messaging has been suggested as a method to improve delivery of health services around the world,14-16 and randomized clinical trials of automated mobile health technology interventions have demonstrated increased adherence to eye care services in China.17

However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated whether SMS reminders could be combined with modest financial incentives, such as free postoperative medications, to improve low rates of follow-up after trabeculectomy surgery. Given the importance of early postoperative interventions, such as bleb needling and ocular massage, in determining success of surgery,18,19 there is a need to improve follow-up. We performed a randomized clinical trial to assess whether SMS reminders combined with the offer of free postoperative medications could improve follow-up after glaucoma surgery in rural China.

Methods

The protocol for this study20 was approved in full by the Ethics Committee of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Oral informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki21 were followed throughout. The trial protocol appears in the Supplement.

Patients and Randomization

From October 1, 2014, through November 31, 2015, consecutive eligible patients undergoing trabeculectomy were enrolled at the inpatient units of 4 rural county-level hospitals (2 in Guangdong Province and 2 in neighboring Guangxi, both in southern China) by ophthalmic nurses before surgery. Eligibility criteria included a medical record that indicated trabeculectomy surgery (concurrent cataract extraction was permitted but not other ocular operations) and the ability to comply with the study protocol. The patients were required to own a cell phone capable of receiving SMS text messages. Illiterate patients were eligible if assisted by a literate spouse, family member, or other person.

Participants were assigned by simple randomization (1:1) to receive both SMS reminders 3 days before appointments at 1 and 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery and free topical corticosteroid medication at each visit (intervention group) or to standard follow-up without reminders or free medication (control group) (Figure). The randomization codes were generated online (http://www.randomization.com). Written allocation assignments were sealed in individual opaque envelopes marked only with study identification numbers, with an equal number of control and intervention patients at each hospital. Regular ocular examinations and analyses were performed by investigators and clinical staff masked to group allocation. However, study participants and study personnel responsible for sending SMS text messages and distributing free eye drops could not be masked because the intervention required overt participation.

Interventions and Outcome Assessment

Patients in the intervention group were informed that their cell phone would receive SMS reminders 3 days before their scheduled appointments but that they should attend their appointments even if the reminders were not received. The Chinese message text read, “This is a reminder of your appointment for ophthalmic examination at [name] Hospital on [date]. Please make preparations in advance to be on time.” The SMS reminders were sent by nurses at a cost to the sender of 0.1 RMB (US$0.02) per message. (Chinese Telecom companies do not charge customers for receipt of SMS messages.)

Intervention group patients were told that they would receive 1 bottle of prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension, 1%, on returning for each scheduled postoperative examinations (total value for 3 bottles was 99 RMB [US$15.90]). Personnel costs per patient in the intervention group were calculated as 50 RMB (US$7.90) based on time spent performing the intervention (sending the SMS, dispensing eye drops, and documenting attempted SMS contacts).

Trabeculectomy surgery was performed as an inpatient procedure at participating facilities, as is typical in rural China, and the initial postoperative examination was performed and questionnaires administered during this 3-day hospital stay. Either limbus- or fornix-based surgery could be performed, although a limbus-based approach was used for all cases unless trabeculectomy was combined with cataract surgery. Mitomycin C could be used but was administered in less than 5% of cases. Those surgeons capable of using releasable sutures did so and would request orally that these patients return for possible scleral flap suture removal. Patients were directed orally by hospital staff to use topical antibiotics 4 times per day for 2 weeks and prednisolone acetate suspension, 1%, 8 times per day for 6 to 8 weeks. A 2-week supply of topical antibiotic eye drops was provided to patients in both groups without charge at the time of discharge. At that time, all patients were instructed orally per protocol by the operative surgeon to return for postoperative examinations at 1 and 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery and were informed of the importance of returning on time in achieving good surgical outcomes.

Study questionnaires were administered in the patient’s hospital room by trained nurses in the patient’s local dialect (Cantonese in Guangdong and Cantonese or Zhuang in Guangxi). Questions concerned factors potentially associated with follow-up based on our previous work in the area: demographic and socioeconomic variables, transportation status, outpatient waiting time, patient satisfaction with surgery, patient attitudes about the importance of follow-up, and the presence or absence of accompanying family members or friends. Each interview required approximately a half hour.

Information on the cost of a follow-up visit was obtained from the billing department of each hospital. A list of daily appointments for both groups was given to clinical staff (masked to group allocation), who were in charge of the regular examinations at each follow-up appointment. Attendance at appointments and the need to remove any surgical sutures were documented. Follow-up was assessed according to this schedule: 1 week (3-11 days after discharge), 2 weeks (12-21 days), and 1 month (22-42 days).

Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome was attendance at the scheduled 1-month postoperative examination. The study was designed to enroll 174 participants, resulting in 80% power with an α error of .05 to detect a difference in adherence rates of 30% vs 55%, with an estimated 80% participation rate. Results were presented as mean (SD) for continuous data with normal distribution and number (percentage) for categorical data. The unadjusted proportions of completed 1-month follow-up examinations, with 95% CIs, were presented separately by study group, stratified by need for suture removal, which previous work9 had found to be strongly associated with follow-up. The differences between study groups in proportion of patients followed up at different times were calculated and 95% CIs constructed using the 2-proportion z test. The unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated, using control group patients not needing suture removal as the reference.

Study group and all variables significant at the P < .20 level in simple regression models were included in multiple regression models, with attendance at the 1-month visit as outcome. We used generalized linear models with Poisson regression to estimate the RR associated with intervention group membership and other potential determinants. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA statistical software, version 13.1 (StataCorp).

To satisfy the requirement of intention-to-treat analysis to include all randomized participants in analyses, we used STATA software22 to perform multiple imputation of missing data with logistic regression models, selecting the independent variables based on predictive value and availability of data. The multiple imputation approach created 20 copies of the data, in which missing values were imputed by chained equations.22 Final results were obtained by averaging these 20 data sets using the Rubin rules, which ensured that the SEs for all regression coefficients took into account uncertainty in the imputations and in the estimation.22

Results

Among 222 consecutive eligible patients undergoing trabeculectomy at the 4 hospitals, 13 (5.9%) declined participation and 209 (94.1%) were enrolled. Among these, 103 (49.7%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 106 (50.3%) to the control group (Figure).

There was no significant difference in the age (intervention group vs control group: mean [SD], 64.4 [12.7] vs 63.0 [12.7] years; P = .43), sex (56 women vs 53; P = .84), educational level (52 individuals vs 64 who had received no schooling or only an elementary school education; P = .06), family annual income (52 individuals vs 57 earning <US$800 per year; P = .44), or other potential determinants of postoperative follow-up between the 2 groups at baseline (Table 1 and Table 2). All patients in both groups received the allocated intervention, and information on the main trial outcome (follow-up at 1 month) was available for 102 patients (96.2%) in the intervention group and 101 (98.1%) in the control group (Figure).

Follow-up remained higher in the intervention group (59 of 102 [57.8%]) compared with the control group (34 of 101 [33.7%]) throughout the study, with the difference most prominent at 1 month (unadjusted RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.63; P = .01). Attendance at 1 month among controls not told to return for scleral flap suture removal was 3 of 31 (9.7%) and 44 of 68 (64.7%) among intervention patients who were told about suture removal (unadjusted RR, 6.69; 95% CI, 2.08-21.6; P = .001) (Table 3).

Factors associated with 1-month attendance in multiple regression models included membership in the intervention group (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.53; P = .02) and being directed to return for removal of scleral flap sutures at 1 month (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.06-3.06; P = .03). Age, sex, income, transportation costs, travel distance, waiting time, and cost of the follow-up examination were not significantly associated with follow-up (Table 4). Inclusion of baseline intraocular pressure and visual acuity at 2 weeks as indications of disease severity and rate of recovery, respectively, did not alter the results of the model.

Discussion

This intervention combining SMS reminders and the offer of free postoperative medication significantly increased adherence to follow-up of patients after glaucoma surgery in rural southern China. The American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Preferred Practice Pattern for Open-Angle Glaucoma,23 which has been adopted for use in China, recommends postoperative follow-up continue for at least 6 weeks, during which time the patient should be evaluated for complications, and a variety of treatments, including repair of bleb leaks, bleb massage, suture lysis, and bleb needling, should be used as needed to maximize the chances of long-term pressure control. Without the SMS and free drug intervention in our current study, barely a third of patients returned at 1 month after surgery (34 of 101 [33.7%]), a time when these important postoperative interventions would commonly still be performed. We did not attempt to extend follow-up beyond 4 weeks in view of previously published work in this population,9 which found very low rates of follow-up already at this point.

Of interest, simply telling patients to return for removal of scleral flap sutures after surgery had an even greater effect on improving adherence and without the costs associated with free medications or sending SMS reminders. In the setting of this project, scleral flap sutures were only routinely removed, and patients were told to return for this procedure when releasable sutures had been used during surgery. However, conjunctival sutures may need to be removed because of the frequent lack of absorbable material in this setting, and it is not uncommon for nonreleasable scleral flap sutures to loosen and become exposed, also requiring removal. Thus, although expanding training in the use of releasable sutures remains a priority, until this substantial task is completed, requesting that all patients return for possible suture removal after glaucoma surgery in rural China is ethical and potentially beneficial to their care. Combining all these simple interventions succeeded in motivating nearly two-thirds of patients to return at 1 month (44 of 68 [64.7%]). This result has significant implications for programs that perform glaucoma surgery in rural China and potentially in similar low-resource areas in other LMICs.

The total cost of providing 3 bottles of medication was only US$15.90 per patient, which may be compared to the mean surgical fee for trabeculectomy at these 4 facilities of 4250 RMB (US$680). Presumably, this cost could be reduced further through bulk purchase of medication across several rural facilities (for reference, there are 120 county hospitals in Guangdong and 109 in Guangxi).

Although the personnel costs of sending the SMS reminders (US$7.90 total per patient) must also be considered, we have previously described17 an automated system for sending SMS reminders that could largely eliminate the unit costs of sending reminder messages manually, after the initial investment in setting up the system. The modest fees associated with the SMS messages themselves (US$0.02 per message per patient) added little to the overall cost of this intervention. An important point regarding the practicality of cell phone interventions in this setting is the finding in the study by Lin et al17 that more than 90% of prospective patients in a similar study in China owned a cell phone capable of receiving SMS messages. This finding is consistent with the current study in which only 1 patient (0.45%) did not own a cell phone and was excluded on this basis.

The result of the current study, in which adherence was nearly doubled with an intervention costing less than US$25 per patient, may be compared with other reports24-28 on interventions to enhance uptake of or adherence with eye care in rural China. Multimedia educational interventions, when used alone, have been unsuccessful in increasing acceptance of low-cost comprehensive eye examinations24 or cataract surgery25 or in promoting purchase of children’s spectacles.26 Although a focus group study27 indicated that patients in rural China may not be comfortable with direct cash payments to encourage medical compliance, Ma et al28 have reported that the offer of free spectacles doubled spectacle wear at a later unannounced examination, which is consistent with improved adherence observed in the present study. It appears that the offer of free medical goods, such as medication and spectacles, may be particularly effective in this setting in changing behavior and gives the added advantage of direct clinical benefit to patients. This finding is also consistent with a finding in a previous trial24 where offering comprehensive examinations for free led to significantly higher uptake compared with even low-cost (<US$3) examinations. It is possible that providing postoperative examinations without cost would have resulted in even higher follow-up in the current study, but unfortunately partner hospitals were unwilling to make such arrangements.

Our maximum effect in enhancing follow-up in the current study was achieved with what may effectively be seen as 3 interventions in combination: SMS reminders, offer of free medications, and directing patients to return for scleral flap suture removal. This finding is consistent with a review29 of interventions to promote adherence with medication use, which concluded that complex interventions, including several components, were most likely to be successful. Thus, this study was not designed to distinguish the separate effects of SMS reminders and free medication on follow-up because we did not think that either intervention alone would be as effective and both interventions were inexpensive, meaning there was little practical disadvantage to aggregating them.

The findings in the current study were not consistent with previous reports that poor adherence to follow-up visits may be significantly associated with transportation costs,30 financial barriers,9 and the lack of an escort.9 None of these factors was significantly associated with attendance at the 1-month visit in this setting, even in univariate analyses. The finding regarding transportation costs is consistent with an earlier study31 in which transport was not reported as an important barrier in a population study of access to cataract surgery in rural China. This finding may reflect a relatively robust transportation infrastructure in this setting. It is encouraging that adherence in this setting can be improved by relatively simple and inexpensive interventions, such as free medications and instructions to return for suture removal. Barriers such as low income and lack of an escort would be more challenging to overcome.

Strengths of the study include its randomized, controlled design, with intervention and control groups being similar at baseline. Losses to follow-up were minimal, and fidelity to the interventions assigned per protocol was good. Finally, the subject of adherence to follow-up after glaucoma surgery in LMICs is little studied and of significance given glaucoma’s status as the world’s leading cause of uncorrectable vision loss,1 the importance of adherence in achieving good surgical outcomes for this disease,23 and documented low follow-up9 in this setting. Weaknesses of the study must also be acknowledged. All patients were operated on and followed up at 4 centers. The results may thus only be applied to other settings with caution. As noted above, the study was not designed to distinguish between separate effects on adherence of the provision of free medications and the use of SMS messaging. Moreover, the current study did not attempt to link postoperative adherence with surgical outcomes. Because many patients in the control group were unavailable for follow-up at 1 month, it is not possible to state whether the intervention significantly improved outcomes, including central visual acuity or peripheral vision, significantly. Finally, the practicality of replicating this intervention in other settings will depend on the willingness of hospitals and local health officials to commit resources to improving outcomes of glaucoma care. This goal may well be realistic and sustainable in at least parts of rural China but may not be so elsewhere in other LMICs.

Conclusions

Despite these limitations, it is hoped that these results may be applied more widely in low-resource areas, where poor acceptance of and adherence to glaucoma care may add to the burden of visual disability.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou China 510060, and TREE Centre, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom (ncongdon1@gmail.com).

Accepted for Publication: June 20, 2016.

Published Online: August 18, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2819.

Author Contributions: Dr Congdon had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Jin, L. Li, Congdon.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Yang, Jin, Zeng, Wei, G. Li, Man, Congdon.

Drafting of the manuscript: Yang, Zeng, Wei, G. Li, Man, Congdon.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jin, L. Li, Congdon.

Statistical analysis: Jin, Congdon.

Obtained funding: Congdon.

Administrative, technical, or material support: L. Li, Congdon.

Study supervision: Yang, Zeng, Wei, G. Li, Man, Congdon.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by Orbis International, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, and the World Diabetes Foundation. Dr Congdon is supported by the Chinese government Thousand Man Plan and by the Ulverscroft Foundation.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Bourne  RR, Stevens  GA, White  RA,  et al; Vision Loss Expert Group.  Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.  Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):e339-e349.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Tham  YC, Li  X, Wong  TY, Quigley  HA, Aung  T, Cheng  CY.  Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Xu  L, Wang  Y, Li  Y,  et al.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing: the Beijing Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1134.e1-1134.e11.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Liang  YB, Friedman  DS, Wong  TY,  et al; Handan Eye Study Group.  Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1965-1972.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Huang  S, Zheng  Y, Foster  PJ, Huang  W, He  M; Liwan Eye Study.  Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Chinese adults in urban southern China.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10):1362-1367.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Nayak  B, Gupta  S, Kumar  G, Dada  T, Gupta  V, Sihota  R.  Socioeconomics of long-term glaucoma therapy in India.  Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(1):20-24.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Congdon  NG, Krishnadas  R, Friedman  DS,  et al.  A study of initial therapy for glaucoma in southern India: India Glaucoma Outcomes and Treatment (INGOT) Study.  Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(3):149-158.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Liang  YB, Wang  NL, Rong  SS, Thomas  R.  Initial treatment for primary angle-closure glaucoma in China.  J Glaucoma. 2015;24(6):469-473.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Yang  K, Jin  L, Li  L,  et al.  Preoperative characteristics and compliance with follow-up after trabeculectomy surgery in rural southern China [published online April 12, 2016].  Br J Ophthalmol.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Liu  K, Rong  S, Liang  Y,  et al.  A retrospective survey of long-term follow-up on primary angle closure glaucoma after trabeculectomy [in Chinese].  Ophthalmol China. 2011;20:50-53.Google Scholar
11.
Jin  QX, Li  JQ, Lin  WJ,  et al.  Investigation and analysis on the causes of failing in follow-up after antiglaucoma operation [in Chinese].  J Clin Ophthalmol. 2006;14:516-518.Google Scholar
12.
Pizzi  LT, Zangalli  CS, Murchison  AP,  et al.  Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes and costs of two eyecare adherence interventions in diabetes patients.  Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(2):253-263.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Wikipedia. List of countries by number of mobile phones in use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use. Accessed October 17, 2014.
14.
Krishna  S, Boren  SA, Balas  EA.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review.  Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(3):231-240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Strandbygaard  U, Thomsen  SF, Backer  V.  A daily SMS reminder increases adherence to asthma treatment: a three-month follow-up study.  Respir Med. 2010;104(2):166-171.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Lester  RT, Ritvo  P, Mills  EJ,  et al.  Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1838-1845.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Lin  H, Chen  W, Luo  L,  et al.  Effectiveness of a short message reminder in increasing compliance with pediatric cataract treatment: a randomized trial.  Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2463-2470.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Singh  J, Bell  RW, Adams  A, O’Brien  C.  Enhancement of post trabeculectomy bleb formation by laser suture lysis.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(7):624-627.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Henderer  JD, Heeg  MC, Spaeth  GL,  et al.  A randomized trial of the long-term effects of digital ocular compression in the late postoperative period.  J Glaucoma. 2001;10(4):266-270.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
clinicaltrials.gov. Effect of SMS Reminder and Free Eye Drops on Follow-up Adherence After Trabeculectomy Surgery in Rural China. NCT02328456. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02328456. Accessed May 23, 2016.
21.
World Medical Association.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.  JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Royston  P.  Multiple imputation of missing values.  Stata J. 2004;4(2):227-241.Google Scholar
23.
Prum  BE, Rosenberg  LF, Gedde  SJ,  et al.  Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines.  Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41-P111.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Dan  A, Raubvogel  G, Chen  T,  et al.  The impact of multimedia education on uptake of comprehensive eye examinations in rural China: a randomized, controlled trial.  Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(4):283-290.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Liu  T, Congdon  N, Yan  X,  et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of an intervention promoting cataract surgery acceptance in rural China: the Guangzhou Uptake of Surgery Trial (GUSTO).  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5271-5278.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Congdon  N, Li  L, Zhang  M,  et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention to promote spectacle use in rural China: the see well to learn well study.  Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2343-2350.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Yan  X, Liu  T, Gruber  L, He  M, Congdon  N.  Attitudes of physicians, patients, and village health workers toward glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy in rural China: a focus group study.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):761-770.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Ma  X, Zhou  Z, Yi  H,  et al.  Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial.  BMJ. 2014;349:g5740.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Haynes  RB, Ackloo  E, Sahota  N, McDonald  HP, Yao  X.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16(2):CD000011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Lee  BW, Sathyan  P, John  RK, Singh  K, Robin  AL.  Predictors of and barriers associated with poor follow-up in patients with glaucoma in South India.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(10):1448-1454.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Yin  Q, Hu  A, Liang  Y,  et al.  A two-site, population-based study of barriers to cataract surgery in rural china.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1069-1075.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×