Are there racial differences in visual field variability over time?
In a cohort study, individuals of African descent with glaucoma showed a larger variability in standard automated perimetry results, as well as increased times to detect progression on computer simulated analyses, compared with individuals of European descent.
Increased visual field variability in glaucomatous eyes in individuals of African descent may result in delayed detection of progression that could potentially contribute to explain higher rates of glaucoma-related visual impairment in this population.
Individuals of African descent have been reported to be at higher risk for becoming visually impaired from glaucoma compared with individuals of European descent.
To investigate racial differences in longitudinal visual field variability and their impact on time to detect visual field progression.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This multicenter prospective observational cohort study included 236 eyes of 173 individuals of European descent and 235 eyes of 171 individuals of African descent followed up for a mean (SD) time of 7.5 (3.4) years.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Differences in test-retest variability and simulated time to detect progression in individuals of African descent and of European descent with glaucoma. Standard automated perimetry mean deviation values were regressed over time for each eye, and SD of the residuals was used as a measure of variability. Distributions of residuals were used in computer simulations to reconstruct “real-world” standard automated perimetry mean deviation trajectories under different assumptions about rate of change and frequency of testing. Times to detect progression were obtained for the simulated visual fields.
Among the 344 patients, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 60.2 (10.0) and 60.6 (9.0) years for individuals of African descent and of European descent, respectively; 94 (52%) and 86 (48%) of individuals of African descent and of European descent were women, respectively. The mean SD of the residuals was larger in eyes of individuals of African descent vs those of European descent (1.45 [0.83] dB vs 1.12 [0.48] dB; mean difference: 0.33 dB; 95% CI of the difference, 0.21-0.46; P < .001). The eyes in individuals of African descent had a larger increase in variability with worsening disease (P < .001). When simulations were performed assuming common progression scenarios, there was a delay to detect progression in eyes of individuals of African descent compared with those of European descent. For a scenario with baseline mean deviation of –10 dB and rate of change of –0.5 dB/y, detection of progression in individuals of African descent was delayed by 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) years, when considered 80% power and annual tests.
Conclusions and Relevance
Patients of African descent with glaucoma showed increased visual field variability compared with those of European descent, resulting in delayed detection of progression that may contribute to explain higher rates of glaucoma-related visual impairment in individuals of African descent compared with those of European descent with glaucoma.
Gracitelli CPB, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, Abe RY, Girkin CA, Weinreb RN, Liebmann JM, Medeiros FA. Detection of Glaucoma Progression in Individuals of African Descent Compared With Those of European Descent. JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online February 15, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6836
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.