[Skip to Navigation]
Comment & Response
January 2019

Language Bias and Methodological Issues in Determining Reliable Evidence for Systematic Reviews

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
  • 2Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland
  • 3Private practice, Gdańsk, Poland
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(1):118-119. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4945

To the Editor We would like to congratulate Golozar et al1 for presenting and discussing the very important issue of credibility of systematic reviews. We believe that agreement on criteria of a trustworthy systematic review will help to decrease the number of low-value studies and reduce waste in scientific publishing. The authors propose different criteria they used to identify reliable and unreliable review articles.

Add or change institution