[Skip to Navigation]
Views 576
Citations 0
Comment & Response
September 12, 2019

Leonardo da Vinci Probably Did Not Have Strabismus—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Optometry and Vision Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(11):1332-1333. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2218

In Reply Marmor’s points are well taken, but they were mostly fully recognized in the analyses for the article itself.1 The form of evidence in my title is not specified, but I would certainly agree that the evidence is circumstantial in legalistic terms, in the sense that no one item constitutes proof but rather each adds an increment of probability to the case. In the absence of specifics, Marmor’s claim that the analyses could have “just as convincingly led to the opposite conclusion” is unsupported. If these are not portraits of Leonardo da Vinci, they lead to no conclusion about his ocular alignment, not to the opposite conclusion.

Add or change institution