Are there any available visual acuity Apple apps suitable for telemedicine use?
In this study of diagnostic devices, none of the tested visual acuity apps were ideal for telemedicine.
While clinicians are limited to apps on iPhone or iPad, these results suggest new and/or improved visual acuity apps are needed for optimal use in telemedicine.
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic illustrates the increasingly important role of telemedicine as a method of clinician-patient interaction. However, electronic applications (apps) for the testing of ophthalmology vital signs, such as visual acuity, can be published and used without any verification of accuracy, validity, or reliability.
To reassess the accuracy of visual acuity–testing apps and assess their viability for telehealth.
Design, Setting, and Participants
The US Apple App Store was queried for apps for visual acuity testing. Anticipated optotype size for various visual acuity lines were calculated and compared against the actual measured optotype size on 4 different Apple hardware devices. No human participants were part of this study.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Mean (SD) errors were calculated per device and across multiple devices.
On iPhones, 10 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 109.9%. On the iPads, 9 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 398.1%. Six apps met criteria and worked on both iPhone and iPad, with mean errors from 0.2% to 249.5%. Of the 6 apps that worked across devices, the top 3 most accurate apps were Visual Acuity Charts (mean [SD] error, 0.2% [0.0%]), Kay iSight Test Professional (mean [SD] error, 3.5% [0.7%]), and Smart Optometry (mean [SD] error, 15.9% [4.3%]). None of the apps tested were ideal for telemedicine, because some apps displayed accurate optotype size, while others displayed the same letters on separate devices; no apps exhibited both characteristics.
Conclusions and Relevance
Both Visual Acuity Charts and Kay iSight Test Professional had low mean (SD) errors and functionality across all tested devices, but no apps were suitable for telemedicine. This suggests that new and/or improved visual acuity–testing apps are necessary for optimal telemedicine use.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Steren BJ, Young B, Chow J. Visual Acuity Testing for Telehealth Using Mobile Applications. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(3):344–347. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6177
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.