[Skip to Navigation]
Views 225
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
July 22, 2021

The Complexity of Integrating Observations Into Observational Research

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(9):1005-1006. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2633

Recent years have seen an increase in the use of technology to measure behaviors in epidemiologic research. This has clear advantages because it reduces the need to rely on self-reporting and objective yet potentially biased measurements. This is particularly advantageous when the behaviors being measured are embedded in the complexity and unpredictability of the everyday world. Two recent examples of the success of this approach are studies on driving1 and hazard detection2 among persons with visual impairment. Pundlik et al2 take an in-the-world approach with their randomized clinical trial examining the at-home use of a chest-mounted collision warning device among persons with visual impairment and blindness. The device automatically detects potential collision hazards and relays their presence via a vibrotactile alert delivered to the person’s wrist. The rate (median [IQR]) of contacts with obstacles when the device was in the active intervention mode was 9.3 (8.4) vs 13.8 (17.0) when the device was in silent (non-alert) mode, reducing collisions by approximately 37%. While laboratory studies have demonstrated improvements in hazard avoidance with wearable devices,3 to our knowledge, this is the first study conducted in everyday settings; thus the results have the potential for greater generalizability.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×