Since Mauthner, in 1867 (Die Lehre vom Glaucom), suggested that "congenital hydrophthalmia is nothing but a glaucoma developed in utero, or soon after birth—more likely secondary than primary," and Muralt, a pupil of Horner, two years later in his inaugural dissertation, called special attention to this view of its pathology, it has generally been considered to be the result of a glaucomatic process due to uveal inflammation.
Reference: Report of a Case of Kerato-Globus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:202.
A look at the past . . . Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(8):1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.117.8.1086
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: