[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 52.200.130.163. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Correspondence
April 2004

Penetrating Keratoplasty Surgery—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Copyright 2004 American Medical Association. All RightsReserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2004

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):664-665. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.664-c

In reply

I thank Dr Van Rij for his appreciation of my article.1 Hehad previously mentioned to me the references he is citing now in his letter(written communication, May 2002). However, I did not think these sourceshad to be referenced in my article. In the technique used by Ebeling and Carrel,2 the donor button is shaped like a mushroom, itsanterior part being larger than its posterior one. The surgical wound obtainedwith this technique does not share one of the main advantages of the procedureI presented1 (ie, resisting the effect ofintraocular pressure) and allows transplantation of only a limited amountof endothelium. Therefore, although a surgical wound with a lamellar componentwas used by these authors, substantial structural and functional differencesfrom the design I proposed do not allow a comparison between the 2 techniques.

×