[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Clinical Trials
April 1, 2005

Verteporfin Therapy of Subfoveal Minimally Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 2-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Visudyne in Minimally Classic Choroidal Neovascularization Study Group*
Author Affiliations

*Authors: The Writing Committee served as author for the Visudyne in Minimally Classic Choroidal Neovascularization (VIM) Study Group.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(4):448-457. doi:10.1001/archopht.123.4.448

Objective  To compare the treatment effect and safety of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin using a standard (SF) or reduced (RF) light fluence rate with that of placebo therapy in patients with subfoveal minimally classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with age-related macular degeneration.

Design  Phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Setting  Nineteen ophthalmology practices in North America and Europe.

Participants  Patients with initial best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/250 and a lesion size of no greater than 6 Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) disc areas.

Methods  We randomly assigned 117 patients (1:1:1) to verteporfin infusion (6 mg/m2) and light application with an RF rate (300 mW/cm2) for 83 seconds (light dose of 25 J/cm2) or an SF rate (600 mW/cm2) for 83 seconds (light dose of 50 J/cm2) or to placebo infusion with RF or SF. Treatment was repeated every 3 months if the treating physician noted fluorescein leakage from CNV on angiography. Patients in whom a predominantly classic lesion developed could receive open-label standard verteporfin treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured every 3 months, and angiographic changes were assessed by the Photograph Reading Center through the 3-month examination unless an ocular adverse event or conversion to a predominantly classic lesion was identified by an investigator. Safety was assessed throughout the study. All outcomes were on an intent-to-treat basis.

Results  One hundred three (88%) of 117 patients completed the 24-month examination. Twelve (30%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo received open-label standard verteporfin treatment after confirmation of presence of predominantly classic CNV. At month 12, a loss of at least 3 lines of visual acuity occurred in 5 (14%) of 36 eyes assigned to RF and 10 (28%) of 36 eyes assigned to SF, compared with 18 (47%) of 38 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .002; SF, P = .08; RF + SF, P = .004). At month 24, this loss occurred in 9 (26%) of 34 eyes assigned to RF and 17 (53%) of 32 assigned to SF, compared with 23 (62%) of 37 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .003; SF, P = .45; RF + SF, P = .03). Progression to predominantly classic CNV by 24 months was more common in the placebo group (11 [28%] of 39 patients compared with 2 [5%] of 38 in the RF group [P = .007] and 1 [3%] of 37 in the SF group [P = .002]). No unexpected ocular or systemic adverse events were identified. Treatment-related, usually transient visual disturbances were 13% with SF, 10% with placebo, and 5% with RF.

Conclusions  Verteporfin therapy safely reduced the risks of losing at least 15 letters (≥3 lines) of visual acuity and progression to predominantly classic CNV for at least 2 years in individuals with subfoveal minimally classic lesions due to age-related macular degeneration measuring 6 MPS disc areas or less. Based on the overall evidence available on verteporfin therapy for these lesions, the VIM Study Group would consider recommending verteporfin therapy for relatively small minimally classic lesions similar to those enrolled in the VIM Trial.