[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 1999

The Goal of Adult Strabismus Surgery Is Not Cosmetic

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(2):250. doi:10.1001/archopht.117.2.250

INSURANCE COMPANIES and managed care providers continue to challenge the medical necessity and indications for many cases of adult strabismus surgery. The rationale of their medical reviewers is usually based on the idea that the only valid indications for strabismus surgery are to achieve fusion or to correct diplopia. They assume incorrectly that unless perfect (bifoveal) fusion can be obtained, there will be no improvement in fusion at all. Adults with residual or recurrent strabismus from childhood usually do not report diplopia. The general understanding in our profession is that bifoveal fusion cannot be achieved as an adult unless it was previously present in childhood. Thus, some claims for coverage for these types of cases are rejected. This continues despite continually expanding data on the efficacy of adult strabismus surgery, including a previous editorial in this journal.1