[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
October 1943


Arch Ophthalmol. 1943;30(4):499-504. doi:10.1001/archopht.1943.00880220091009

The return of hypertension after an apparently faultless operation for glaucoma is a bête noire of the ophthalmic surgeon. It cannot be predicted or forestalled. It must simply be accepted as one of the hazards of glaucoma to be dealt with as well as possible.

The literature is replete with indications and contraindications for primary operations, but there is little general agreement as to the relative efficacy and value of the operations themselves. This is undoubtedly due to a lack of understanding of the etiology and pathology of glaucoma. Each operation is designed to relieve only the hypertension, by removing the obvious barriers to filtration or by providing a vicarious pathway. The underlying disease is not cured by the removal of one of its symptoms.

In spite of innovations and modifications of operations for glaucoma, little factual or practical progress has been made within the past twenty-five years. Statistical reports

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview