[Skip to Navigation]
November 1961


Author Affiliations

Eye Clinic Philadelphia General Hospital Philadelphia.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(5):762-763. doi:10.1001/archopht.1961.00960010764024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:  —I read with some interest the article by Cogan and Kuwabara "Orbital Reaction to Sponge (Ivalon) Implant," Arch. Ophthal. 65:646, 1961. In the past 3 years, we have performed 32 enucleations and 3 eviscerations in which Ivalon was used as the implant.In reviewing our results several months ago, it was found that 12 (37%) of the implants had become exposed and required either complete removal or partial excision with repeat closure, and on occasion another repeat partial excision.Of the 3 eviscerations (Burch's type), one eroded through the cornea and also the sclera superiorly after a period of 6 months.Of 10 plastic ball implants into Tenon's capsule, we have had no extrusions or exposures.We have, of course, ceased to use Ivalon as a prosthetic material and agree whole-heartedly with your statement, "Ivalon clearly cannot be considered an inert material."

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
Add or change institution