This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—Drs. S. Vannas and A. Tarkkanen have called my attention to a typographical error in the Glaucoma review in the December Archives of Ophthalmology Since it is important in their study of retinal vein occlusion and glaucoma, I would like to correct it.Under "Secondary Glaucoma," page 882, in a study of retinal vein occlusion and glaucoma, it states that "hemorrhagic glaucoma developed in 11 eyes; NONE of the fellow eyes had simple glaucoma." This should be corrected to read that NINE of the fellow eyes had simple glaucoma.
McGarry HI. ANNUAL REVIEW-GLAUCOMA. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;68(1):150. doi:10.1001/archopht.1962.00960030154030
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: