This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Dr. Welsh's letter was referred to Dr. Boeder, who offers the following reply:
To the Editor:
—Dr. Welsh brands as misleading and inaccurate my statement that the so-called ring scotoma is "approximately 10°." This is not meant to be an accurate figure; it is an estimate which is to convey an idea regarding the magnitude of this blind region, and as such I can only reaffirm it. Nor does Dr. Welsh himself give an exact figure, but merely states that "This so-called scotoma is somewhat larger than 10° on the average...." Then, in the next sentence, he discounts the importance of an exact figure, stating, "Whether it is 10° or 18° is not the important factor...," and thus comes to his real objection to my little paper, namely that I omitted any reference to the "roving" of the ring scotoma to which he has given some special attention, and which
Boeder P. ROVING RING SCOTOMA-Reply. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;69(5):686–687. doi:10.1001/archopht.1963.00960040691024
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.