This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Dr. Mark's letter was referred to Dr. Messenger, who offers the following reply.
To the Editor:
Dr. Mark dislikes my article on "Glaukoma and Glaucoma" because I "rebuked" American ophthalmologists. I said that the ancients knew nothing of pathology as we know it and that the ancient Greeks had no concept whatever of cataract as such, and—most offensively of all—I disesteemed the (apparently his) Germanic pronunciation of the English word glaucoma. I am propagating errors, says Dr. Mark, of which he will correct "a few."If to undervalue a deviant pronunciation is to rebuke American ophthalmologists I am guilty.If it is conceded that the ancient Greeks were far behind us in knowledge of gross anatomy, physiology, and histology (they had no microscopes), it seems overgenerous to say they knew pathology as we know it. Certainly in their own way they knew much about the eye and its diseases.Evidence
Messenger HK. GLAUCOMA, MESSENGER, AND HIPPOCRATES-Reply. Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;71(6):880. doi:10.1001/archopht.1964.00970010895021
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: