This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The dean of ophthalmic librarians, Charles Snyder of the Howe Library of Ophthalmology, when asked what constitutes a good fundus atlas, replied, "If the pictures are good, the atlas is good." This small book by Nover has excellent photographs: the details are sharp, the colors true, and the spectrum of coverage is broad. So, true to Snyder's aphorism, this is a fine atlas. Is it to be recommended? That is a difficult question to answer.
To the best of my knowledge, there are at least three other color fundus atlases in print. The color reproductions in all of them are excellent. What then distinguishes this particular book? In terms of criticism, there are two major deficiencies. One chapter devoted to the different methods of examining the ocular fundus is useful to the non-ophthalmologist. But, nine pages of this short book are devoted to refractive errors and methods of refraction. It
Wand M. The Ocular Fundus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(12):1379. doi:10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020997017
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: