This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—Bernard Schwartz, MD, PhD, who is editor-in-chief of the Survey of Ophthalmology, has drawn to my attention a misconception about the Survey in my article, "Searching the Literature and Computerized Services in Ophthalmology," which appeared in the June issue of the Archives (94:909-913, 1976).
Since 1968, the Survey of Ophthalmology has increasingly become a review and educational journal, with the proportion of abstracts decreasing correspondingly. In the issues for volume 19 (of which No. 6, May-June 1975 was the last I saw before I submitted my manuscript for publication), 88 of 404 pages (22%) were devoted to abstracts. I regret that the "old" Survey, which I frequently used, left my subconscious with such a persistent after-image.
Beatty WK. Survey of Ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(1):169. doi:10.1001/archopht.1977.04450010169028
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: