This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.
—Dr Paul Henkind's main point appears to be that I have erred grievously in not citing his article on ocular neovascularization (Am J Ophthalmol 1978;85:287-301). Anyone familiar with the subject of ocular neovascularization knows how vast is the literature on this subject. Had I to cite every available article, my bibliography would have run to many times the length of the article. In fact, I originally submitted to the Archives an article about four to five times the size of the published article (Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:574), but the reviewer and the chief editor insisted on a drastic reduction in the size of the text and bibliography. Hence, I had to restrict my review of the literature to the most relevant publications only. I am well aware of Dr Henkind's article but consider it, though a good review of ocular neovascularization, not relevant to the hypothesis postulated by
Hayreh SS. Ocular Neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(11):2083. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040935030
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.