• Oculab Tono-Pen tonometry was compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry in 142 eyes of 71 patients without corneal problems. Overall we found 63% of the Tono-Pen readings to be within ±2 mm Hg of the Goldmann applanation tonometry readings and 77% to be within ±3 mm Hg, while 4% were within at least ±7 mm Hg difference. The correlation coefficient between the readings of the two instruments was.84. The mean value of the paired differences was 0.81 ± 3.09 mm Hg overall, −1.78 ± 1.86 mm Hg in the 4 to 10 mm Hg interval, 0.07 ± 2.97 mm Hg in the 11 to 20 mm Hg interval, 1.27 ± 2.62 mm Hg in the 21 to 30 mm Hg interval, and 4.15 ± 2.28 mm Hg in the 31 to 45 mm Hg interval. We conclude that the Tono-Pen measures intraocular pressure in a manner that corresponds well to the Goldmann tonometer in the 11 to 20 mm Hg interval, and fairly well in the 4 to 10 mm Hg and 21 to 30 mm Hg intervals. It lacks good correspondence in the 31 to 45 mm Hg interval.
Frenkel REP, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):750–753. doi:10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130820030
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.