This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
This book is a collection of essays on the problems facing journalists reporting on environmental health risks.
In the first essay, Bruce Ames of the University of California presents a number of misconceptions, presumably fostered by media coverage, about cancer rates, environmental causation of cancer and birth defects, and the ability to quantify health risks to humans based on rodent testing. He concludes that there is "no persuasive evidence from epidemiology or toxicology linking pollution as a significant source of birth defects or cancer." He argues that the ability of science to measure minute components of chemicals in the environment obscures the fact that there is currently no way to quantify the risk to humans based on tests on rodents, and this ability diverts attention from known risks, such as cigarette smoking and radon. This essay lays the groundwork for the subsequent essayists as they analyze the difficulties faced by
Kennedy M. Health Risks and the Press: Perspectives on Media Coverage on Risk Assessment and Health. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(7):924. doi:10.1001/archopht.1990.01070090026015
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: