To the Editor.
—I compliment Britt et al1 for their excellent photographs and interpretation of the clinical significance of microaerosol formation. In their "Comment" section, I counted five instances in which they used the phrase "g of force." The authors may recall that gram is a unit of mass, not of force.2 Force is measured in dynes (g·cm·s-2) or in newtons (kg·m·s-2), and is the product of mass and acceleration, according to Sir Isaac Newton's second law. For example, a 1-g mass at the surface of the earth is acted on by 1 g times 981 cm·s-2, or 981 dynes, of force, where 981 cm·s-2 is the acceleration due to gravity. To a physicist, the phrase "grams of force" is meaningless. Britt et al may reply that two textbooks on glaucoma3,4 described the scale of Goldmann's applanation tonometer as being calibrated in "grams
Kalenak JW. Grams of Force. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(10):1346. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080100026016
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: