Bilateral Sequential Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Comparison of Visual Outcomes in Fellow Eyes Using Quantitative Analysis of Goldmann Visual Fields | Neuro-ophthalmology | JAMA Ophthalmology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.108.182. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Navigation Landing]
Clinical Sciences
July 2012

Bilateral Sequential Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Comparison of Visual Outcomes in Fellow Eyes Using Quantitative Analysis of Goldmann Visual Fields

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Mercado, Purvin, and WuDunn) and Neurology (Dr Purvin), Indiana University School of Medicine, and Neuro-ophthalmology Section, Midwest Eye Institute (Dr Purvin), Indianapolis; and Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, and Department of Clinical Science and Ophthalmology, University of Umea, Umea, Switzerland (Dr Kawasaki).

Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(7):863-867. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.581
Abstract

Objective To better define the concordance of visual loss in patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

Methods The medical records of 86 patients with bilateral sequential NAION were reviewed retrospectively, and visual function was assessed using visual acuity, Goldmann visual fields, color vision, and relative afferent papillary defect. A quantitative total visual field score and score per quadrant were analyzed for each eye using the numerical Goldmann visual field scoring method.

Results Outcome measures were visual acuity, visual field, color vision, and relative afferent papillary defect. A statistically significant correlation was found between fellow eyes for multiple parameters, including logMAR visual acuity (P = .01), global visual field (P < .001), superior visual field (P < .001), and inferior visual field (P < .001). The mean deviation of total (P < .001) and pattern (P < .001) deviation analyses was significantly less between fellow eyes than between first and second eyes of different patients.

Conclusions Visual function between fellow eyes showed a fair to moderate correlation that was statistically significant. The pattern of vision loss was also more similar in fellow eyes than between eyes of different patients. These results may help allow better prediction of visual outcome for the second eye in patients with NAION.

×