Single vs Multiple Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Glaucoma Surgical Trials | Glaucoma | JAMA Ophthalmology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Sultan  MB, Mansberger  SL, Lee  PP.  Understanding the importance of IOP variables in glaucoma: a systematic review.  Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(6):643-662.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Weinreb  RN, Kaufman  PL.  The glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future: a report from the NEI/FDA CDER Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(4):1497-1505.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Shaarawy  TM, Sherwood  MB, Grehn  F, eds.  WGA Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2009.
4.
Orzalesi  N, Rossetti  L, Invernizzi  T, Bottoli  A, Autelitano  A.  Effect of timolol, latanoprost, and dorzolamide on circadian IOP in glaucoma or ocular hypertension.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(9):2566-2573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Liu  JHK, Kripke  DF, Weinreb  RN.  Comparison of the nocturnal effects of once-daily timolol and latanoprost on intraocular pressure.  Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(3):389-395.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Medeiros  FA, Pinheiro  A, Moura  FC, Leal  BC, Susanna  R  Jr.  Intraocular pressure fluctuations in medical versus surgically treated glaucomatous patients.  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002;18(6):489-498.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Wilensky  JT.  The role of diurnal pressure measurements in the management of open angle glaucoma.  Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15(2):90-92.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Health Quality Ontario.  Diurnal tension curves for assessing the development or progression of glaucoma: an evidence-based analysis.  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011;11(2):1-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Drance  SM.  The significance of the diurnal tension variations in normal and glaucomatous eyes.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1960;64(4):494-501.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Saccà  SC, Rolando  M, Marletta  A, Macrí  A, Cerqueti  P, Ciurlo  G.  Fluctuations of intraocular pressure during the day in open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma and normal subjects.  Ophthalmologica. 1998;212(2):115-119.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
David  R, Zangwill  L, Briscoe  D, Dagan  M, Yagev  R, Yassur  Y.  Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(5):280-283.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Jonas  JB, Budde  WM, Stroux  A, Oberacher-Velten  IM, Juenemann  AG.  Circadian intraocular pressure profiles in chronic open angle glaucomas.  J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2010;5(2):92-100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Realini  T, Weinreb  RN, Wisniewski  S.  Short-term repeatability of diurnal intraocular pressure patterns in glaucomatous individuals.  Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):47-51.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Realini  T, Weinreb  RN, Wisniewski  SR.  Diurnal intraocular pressure patterns are not repeatable in the short term in healthy individuals.  Ophthalmology. 2010;117(9):1700-1704.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
August 2014

Single vs Multiple Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Glaucoma Surgical Trials

Author Affiliations
  • 1Medical student, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2medical student, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 4Transcend Medical Inc, Menlo Park, California
  • 5Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • 6Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(8):956-962. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.867
Abstract

Importance  Little is known about the necessity of multiple same-day intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in describing the effect of IOP-lowering surgical procedures, and such evidence could affect surgical trial recruitment and retention of participants.

Objective  To determine whether a single IOP measurement might adequately approximate the mean of several measurements in glaucoma surgical trials.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A prospective, multicenter, interventional cohort from the prerandomization phase of a randomized clinical trial evaluating use of a supraciliary implant for treatment of IOP was conducted at multiple ophthalmology clinics. A total of 609 patients (609 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract were included.

Interventions  One IOP measurement was made while patients were receiving their usual medications to lower IOP, and 3 IOP measurements were made at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm after patients underwent washout of all IOP-lowering eyedrops.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The proportion of eyes in which the increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, differed by more than 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 mm Hg from the increase in IOP after washout using only 1 of the postwashout measurements. A proportion of 10% or less at the 1.5–mm Hg cutoff was considered clinically acceptable. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection but before the data were examined.

Results  The mean (SD) IOP before washout was 18.5 (4.0) mm Hg. The mean increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, was 5.3 (4.2) mm Hg. The percentage of eyes in which the increase in IOP using a single postwashout IOP differed from the increase in IOP using the mean of 3 measurements by more than 1.5 mm Hg was 35.1%, 25.6%, 34.2%, 30.0%, and 31.4% when the single measurement was made at 8 am, 12 pm, 4 pm, a randomly chosen single measure of those 3 times, and the time closest to that of the prewashout IOP, respectively. By logistic regression, the 12 pm postwashout IOP had the lowest proportion of eyes differing from the mean (P < .001) and thus most closely approximated the mean diurnal IOP.

Conclusions and Relevance  Although eliminating multiple IOP measurements would simplify the conduct of surgical trials in glaucoma, our data show that using a single IOP measurement after washout does not adequately approximate the mean of multiple IOP measurements.

×