Vertical Location of the Corneal Light Reflex in Strabismus Photography | Cataract and Other Lens Disorders | JAMA Ophthalmology | JAMA Network
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the normal eye. C indicates center of corneal curvature; LR, location of corneal light reflex; and E, center of entrance pupil. Numbers indicate distances in millimeters from the front corneal surface in the standard schematic eye.

Figure 2.

A, Displacement of corneal light reflex with fixation on camera lens. Projection of the corneal light reflex, LR, is above the projection of the center of the entrance pupil, E. B, Optimum displacement of LR for flash photography. Projection of LR is vertically level with the projection of E. C, Displacement of LR with fixation on flash.

Figure 3.

Geometric representation of Figure 2, B. C, LR, and E are defined in the legends of Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Figure 4.

Influence of the anterior segment configuration on x/g, the percentage of distance to the flash. Predictions are based on a model described in the legends of Figure 2 and Figure 3. The solid line depicts the influence of the anterior chamber depth. The dashed line depicts the influence of the corneal radius of curvature.

Figure 5.

Displacement of pupillary light reflex in a normal volunteer. The 7 photographs represent fixation points of 0% (bottom), 25%, 50%, 70%, 84%, 90%, and 100% (top) of the distance from the camera lens to the flash. Prominent inferior scleral show is due to the exaggerated distance of the flash from the camera lens.

Figure 6.

Deviation of the light reflex from the center of the entrance pupil as measured in 8 normal volunteers. The intersection of each line with the x-axis indicates the optimum fixation point for that subject. To simplify the figure, each line (1 through 8) is the average of the numbers obtained for 2 eyes, which were not substantially different in any subject.

Figure 7.

Comparison of photographs taken with flash held above and below the camera lens. A, The flash was held 12.5 cm above the camera lens. B, The flash was held adjacent to, and below, the camera lens.

Figure 8.

Recommended procedure for flash photography of strabismus patients. The position of the flash is illustrated. Numbers indicate the fraction of the distance between the center of the flash and the center of the camera lens. The dashed line indicates the optimum fixation point.

1.
Barry  JCEffert  RKaupp  ABurhoff  A Measurement of ocular alignment with photographic Purkinje I and IV reflection pattern evaluation.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;354219- 4235Google Scholar
2.
Riddell  PMHainline  LAbramov  I Calibration of the Hirschberg test in human infants.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35538- 543Google Scholar
3.
Brodie  SE Photographic calibration of the Hirschberg test.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28736- 742Google Scholar
4.
DeRespinis  PANaidu  EBrodie  SE Calibration of Hirschberg test photographs under clinical conditions.  Ophthalmology. 1989;96944- 949Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Jones  REskridge  JB The Hirschberg test: a re-evaluation.  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1970;47105- 114Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Paliaga  GP Linear strabismometric methods.  Binocul Vis. 1992;7139- 154Google Scholar
7.
Miller  JMMellinger  MGreivenkemp  JSimons  K Videographic Hirschberg measurement of simulated strabismic deviations.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;343220- 3229Google Scholar
8.
Kushner  BJed A case of nystagmus with fixation abduction with a large residual contralateral esotropia after prior esotropia surgery [Grand Rounds No43].  Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1996;11268- 274Google Scholar
9.
Bennett  AGFrancis  JL The eye as an optical system. Davson  Hed. The Eye Vol 4 Visual Optics and the Optical Space Sense New York, NY Academic Press1962;101- 115Google Scholar
10.
Szirth  BCKimm  GLMurphree  AL Flash selection in strabismus photography.  J Ophthalmic Photogr. 1986;960- 63Google Scholar
• Cite This

### Citation

Hunter DG, Guyton DL. Vertical Location of the Corneal Light Reflex in Strabismus Photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(6):767–771. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.6.767

Clinical Sciences
June 1998

# Vertical Location of the Corneal Light Reflex in Strabismus Photography

Author Affiliations

From Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute (Drs Hunter and Guyton) and the Department of Biomedical Engineering (Dr Hunter), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(6):767-771. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.6.767
Abstract

Objective  To improve the clinical documentation of strabismus by mathematically predicting and clinically verifying the location of a fixation target that produces a vertically centered corneal light reflex (first Purkinje image) in clinical photographs of the eye using a standard photographic flash unit.

Materials and Methods  Mathematical modeling of the corneal light reflex during clinical photography was based on the schematic eye. Clinical photographs were taken using a range of fixation targets located between the center of the camera lens and the center of the flash. Image quality was also assessed subjectively.

Results  Optimum vertical centration of the corneal light reflex was predicted and produced when the fixation target was located one fifth of the distance from the center of the flash to the center of the camera lens. Placement of the flash below, rather than above, the camera lens provided more uniform illumination of the patient's eyes and face. Decreasing the distance between the camera lens and the flash minimized the severity of these artifacts.

Conclusions  A poorly positioned corneal light reflex makes it difficult to identify the fixing eye in photographs of patients with strabismus, especially when vertical strabismus is present. Adoption of the aforementioned protocol will reproduce the appearance of coaxially viewed corneal light reflexes and provide much-needed standardization for strabismus case presentation.

WHILE THE importance of geometric analyses of the corneal light reflex (first Purkinje image)1,2 has been recognized in photographic calibration3,4 of the Hirschberg test,5-7 less attention has been paid to the vertical centration of the corneal light reflex in clinical photographs of patients with strabismus. Published photographs frequently demonstrate marked vertical decentration of the light reflex in patients without vertical deviations.8 These artifactual deviations occur when a vertically mounted flash unit is used and the patient fixes on the center of the camera lens. The image of the flash is displaced superiorly in the entrance pupil of the eye, resulting in the appearance of a hypotropia. When the subject fixes on the center of the flash, the corneal light reflex is displaced inferiorly, resulting in an apparent hypertropia.8

When only horizontal deviations exist, and the flash is positioned vertically over the camera aperture, these artifacts do not interfere substantially with assessment of the strabismic deviation. However, when vertical deviations are photographed in primary position, the lack of a standardized fixation point makes it difficult to identify the fixing eye from the position of the light reflex. We used a mathematical model to determine the influence of globe rotation on the position of the corneal light reflex. Calculations were based on corneal radius of curvature, entrance pupil location, and camera flash-lens separation. The predictions of the model were verified in 8 controls.

Materials and methods

Calculations were based on the measurements of the schematic eye.9 Three additional simplifying assumptions were made: (1) a spherical corneal surface, (2) a central, symmetrical pupil, and (3) a vertically centered corneal light reflex observed when the subject fixed on a coaxial light source. No assumption was made about the center of rotation of the eye; ie, the center of rotation was considered unrelated to the center of curvature of the cornea.

To verify the mathematical model, 8 normal subjects were photographed using a 35-mm single-lens reflex camera with a 90-mm macro lens and a conventional, detachable flash unit. Prior to photography, the patient was asked to fixate on a handheld penlight to determine the vertical centration of the corneal light reflex within the entrance pupil. For photography, the distance between the flash and the subject was 40 cm, with the camera lens set on 1:4 magnification. The face of the flash unit was held flush with, and above, the front edge of the camera lens.

To exaggerate decentration of the light reflex, the center of the flash was placed 12.5 cm from the center of the camera lens. A card with numbered fixation points was mounted between the camera and flash unit. Photographs of normal volunteers were taken as they fixed on the center of the camera lens and at points 25%, 50%, 70%, 84%, 90%, and 100% of the distance from the camera to the center of the flash. Photographs were magnified ×100 using a projector, and the distance between the vertical center of the pupil and the center of the light reflex was measured in each position of gaze.

In 4 subjects, additional photographs were taken with the flash unit below rather than above the center of the camera lens. These pictures were compared for visualization of the light reflex, illumination of the eye and eyelids, intensity of reflection from the forehead and cheeks, and magnitude of inferior scleral show.

Results
Mathematical model

The locations of interest for the schematic eye are shown in Figure 1, with C representing the center of curvature of the anterior surface of the cornea. In the Gullstrand schematic eye, the radius of curvature (r) is 7.7 mm.9 By assumptions 1 through 3 (see "Materials and Methods" section), C is always located in the horizontal plane passing through the line of sight. The location of the corneal light reflex (first Purkinje image) is LR, which for a distant light source is behind the cornea by r/2. In the schematic eye illuminated by a light 40 cm away, LR is 3.81 mm behind the cornea. The entrance pupil is the image of the pupil formed by the cornea. The center of the entrance pupil is E. In the schematic eye, the actual plane of the pupil is 3.6 mm behind the front corneal surface, while E is 3.05 mm behind the surface.

Figure 2, A demonstrates how LR is displaced when the subject fixes on the center of the camera lens. The corneal light reflex is located above the center of the pupil, while E does not move; thus, the eye appears to deviate downward. Figure 2, B shows the optimum position of the eye for flash photography. At a fixation point somewhere between the flash and the camera lens, the projected image of LR is level with E. At this point, the eye appears to be centered vertically. In Figure 2, C, when the patient fixes on the flash, the globe rotates upward, and E is displaced upward as well, so that LR now projects to a point lower than E. Thus, the eye appears to deviate upward.

In Figure 3, the relationships shown in Figure 2, B are diagrammed schematically. The expression x/g equals the fraction of the distance between the camera and flash. The optimum fixation point can be determined by solving for x/g in terms of f (the distance from C to LR) and p (the distance from C to E). The diagram is solved by constructing a right triangle, extending the segment e past LR and down to C. By similar triangles,

and dividing to eliminate c,

At distances ordinarily used for flash photography, where de, d1 is approximately equal to d2. In this case, equation 1 simplifies to:

When the flash is held closer to the eye, it is necessary to solve for d2 and d1. This can be done in terms of d, f, and p using the Pythagorean theorem:

Combining with equation 1:

Solving for "x/g,"

or:

In most cases, ed, g≪d, and p2f2 so that the denominator on the right side of equation 3 approaches d. When this is the case, the equation once again simplifies to equation 2: x/g=f/p.

In the schematic eye, f is determined by subtracting the distance between LR and the corneal surface from r. Similarly, the value for p is determined by subtracting the distance between E and the corneal surface from r. Thus:

Inserting these values into equation 2, x/g=0.84. Thus, if the point of fixation is 84% of the distance between the camera and the flash (or ≈15 of the distance from the flash to the camera lens), LR should be properly centered in photographs.

Since x/g is a function of f /p, the optimum fixation point changes when the center of curvature of the cornea or the anterior chamber depth varies from the standard schematic eye. The influence of these deviations, as predicted by the mathematical model, is depicted in Figure 4. A 1-mm shallowing of the anterior chamber or a 1-mm increase in r lowers the optimum fixation point by 5% to 12%.

Validation of model predictions

Figure 5 is a representative series of photographs taken with a normal subject fixing at selected points between the camera lens and the flash, with the flash located 12.5 cm above the camera lens. The light reflex is best centered at a deviation of 84% from the center of the camera lens. The deviation of LR from the center of the pupil using the same camera-flash arrangement in 8 normal volunteers is plotted in Figure 6. Six of the subjects conformed closely to the predictions of the model, with the plot crossing the x-axis very close to 84%. The plot of subject 8 crossed the axis with fixation at 50% and the plot of subject 7 at 65% of the distance from camera lens to flash. In both of these subjects, LR was lower than E when inspected with a handheld penlight. In the other 6 subjects, the line of sight was vertically centered in the entrance pupil. Deviations measuring less than 0.3 mm above or below the center of the pupil did not appear decentered on the photographs when appraised subjectively (Figure 5, 70% and 90% displacement).

Optimizing illumination

Additional photographs of 5 subjects were taken with the flash below the camera lens. In most cases, the positions of the eyelid and eye were more easily seen when the flash was below the camera lens. This was caused by the shadow cast onto the eyes by the upper eyelid margins, or the brow in some cases, when the flash was held above the camera lens (Figure 7, A). There was less scleral show when the flash and fixation point were below, and adjacent to, the camera lens (Figure 7, B).

Comment

In the office, the clinician views the eyes with a coaxial light source to qualitatively assess strabismus by evaluating the relative centration of the corneal light reflexes. This also allows identification of the fixing eye in most cases. Ideally, photographs that document strabismus in primary position should exactly reproduce this familiar image. However, the geometry of standard photographic equipment makes this difficult to achieve unless the fixation point is carefully specified. Failure to select the proper fixation point causes unfamiliar and confusing vertical displacement of the corneal light reflex (Figure 5, bottom). When both light reflexes are vertically\ displaced, it may still be possible to identify a vertical deviation by comparing relative displacement of the corneal light reflexes, but it is more difficult to identify the fixing eye in the photograph.8 Decentration is less of a problem in other gaze positions, where the corneal light reflex is typically not centered in the fixing eye.

In the proposed mathematical model, the optimum point of fixation, x/g, is in most cases equal to f/p, which is determined by the radius of curvature of the cornea and the depth of the anterior chamber. In the average eye this number is close to 3.89 mm/4.65 mm, or 84% of the distance from the center of the camera lens to the center of the flash. In other words, a fixation target should be placed approximately one fifth of the distance from the center of the flash to the center of the camera lens. Photographs of 8 normal subjects confirmed the accuracy of the mathematical model in most cases (Figure 5).

Two subjects did not conform as well to this model. Assumption 3 (see "Materials and Methods" section) was not true in these cases—ie, the corneal light reflex was not centered vertically when viewed with a coaxial light source. An unusual anterior chamber depth or corneal power could also change the optimum fixation point in some subjects (Figure 4). Thus, even when our recommended technique is used, there may be some subjects in whom anatomic factors make it impossible to identify the fixing eye from the photograph alone.

When the subject is within a few centimeters of the camera, the more complicated equation 3 must be used to estimate the proper fixation point. Such small distances are not ordinarily used for strabismus photography, and the correction factor is minimal even for these small distances: at a subject distance of only 4 cm from the camera and a flash separation of 4 cm from the camera lens, x /g=79%.

For this study, the flash was separated 12.5 cm from the camera lens to accentuate any potential errors in the model. This distance nears that obtained when large bounce flash units are mounted on top of a camera body. The exaggerated separation produced a brow shadow on the upper eyelid and increased the inferior scleral show at the point of optimum fixation (Figure 7, top). These artifacts can be eliminated by holding the flash close to the camera lens (Figure 7, bottom, and Figure 8); this also decreases decentration of the light reflex in eyes deviating significantly from the schematic model.

While optimum centration of the corneal light reflex can be achieved with the flash either above or below the camera lens, our best photographs were obtained with the flash just below the camera lens (Figure 8). Holding it there eliminated scleral show and better illuminated the eyes by avoiding brow shadows. Few cameras are available with mounts that allow below-the-lens positioning, but it is possible to hold the flash with a free hand, or to build a simple custom mount. It is easier to position or build a mount for a small, low-powered flash, which is also less uncomfortably bright for the patient.

In some instant cameras, the flash is mounted to the side of the camera lens, which produces confusing horizontal displacement of the corneal light reflexes. We have obtained good results by turning these cameras 90° to position the flash below the camera lens, then placing a fixation target the recommended one fifth of the distance from the center of the flash to the center of the camera lens.

Moving the flash as close as possible to the camera lens decreases the decentration problem but does not eliminate it. Other ways to prevent decentration of the corneal light reflex include the use of a beam splitter or a ring flash unit. A beam splitter can produce a truly coaxial flash, but produces distracting, bright-red pupils, is difficult to mount, and is not easily available. Szirth et al10 recommend a ring flash for strabismus photography because of its more-accurate centration and more-even illumination. However, a ring flash is expensive and, in our opinion, the segmented or annular LR is more difficult to interpret than the familiar reflection of a point source. When a ring flash is used, the patient must fix near the center of the camera lens, where there is no precise fixation target. We obtained good results using a segmented ring flash by illuminating only the lower segment and placing a fixation target one fifth of the distance from the center of that segment to the center of the camera lens.

For ordinary flash photography there is a fixation point that provides optimum vertical centration of the corneal light reflex. This point is fairly constant even with variations in ocular anatomy and photographic apparatus. We propose that, when documenting strabismus with photography, the flash unit be held adjacent to, and directly below, the camera lens. The subject should fixate on a target placed one fifth of the distance from the center of the flash to the center of the camera lens (Figure 8). This uniform standard, based on the geometry of the eye, will produce essentially the same vertical centration of the corneal light reflex in strabismus photography as is seen with handheld penlight testing.

Accepted for publication February 24, 1998.

This study was supported in part by the Knights Templar Eye Foundation, Chicago, Ill; the Whitaker Foundation for Biomedical Engineering, Washington, DC; the Niuta and Roy Titus Faculty Development Award, New York, NY; the Richard Starr Ross Clinician Scientist Award, Baltimore, Md; research grant NIH F32-EY06447 from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Hunter); the Alcon Research Institute, Fort Worth, Tex (Dr Guyton); and Research to Prevent Blindness, New York (Dr Guyton).

Corresponding author: David G. Hunter, MD, PhD, Wilmer 233, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287-9028 (e-mail: dhunter@ishtar.med.jhu.edu)

References
1.
Barry  JCEffert  RKaupp  ABurhoff  A Measurement of ocular alignment with photographic Purkinje I and IV reflection pattern evaluation.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;354219- 4235Google Scholar
2.
Riddell  PMHainline  LAbramov  I Calibration of the Hirschberg test in human infants.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35538- 543Google Scholar
3.
Brodie  SE Photographic calibration of the Hirschberg test.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28736- 742Google Scholar
4.
DeRespinis  PANaidu  EBrodie  SE Calibration of Hirschberg test photographs under clinical conditions.  Ophthalmology. 1989;96944- 949Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Jones  REskridge  JB The Hirschberg test: a re-evaluation.  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1970;47105- 114Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Paliaga  GP Linear strabismometric methods.  Binocul Vis. 1992;7139- 154Google Scholar
7.
Miller  JMMellinger  MGreivenkemp  JSimons  K Videographic Hirschberg measurement of simulated strabismic deviations.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;343220- 3229Google Scholar
8.
Kushner  BJed A case of nystagmus with fixation abduction with a large residual contralateral esotropia after prior esotropia surgery [Grand Rounds No43].  Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1996;11268- 274Google Scholar
9.
Bennett  AGFrancis  JL The eye as an optical system. Davson  Hed. The Eye Vol 4 Visual Optics and the Optical Space Sense New York, NY Academic Press1962;101- 115Google Scholar
10.
Szirth  BCKimm  GLMurphree  AL Flash selection in strabismus photography.  J Ophthalmic Photogr. 1986;960- 63Google Scholar