Ocular Trauma Following Penetrating Keratoplasty: Incidence, Outcome, and Postoperative Recommendations | Cornea | JAMA Ophthalmology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.100.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Friedman  AH Late traumatic wound rupture following successful partial penetrating keratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75117- 119Google Scholar
2.
Raber  IMArentsen  JJLaibson  PR Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;981407- 1409Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Topping  TMStark  WJMaumenee  EKenyon  KR Traumatic wound dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66174- 178Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Farley  MKPettit  TH Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;10444- 48Google Scholar
5.
Binder  PSAbel  RPolack  FMKaufman  HE Keratoplasty wound separation.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80109- 115Google Scholar
6.
Brown  SITragakis  MP Wound dehiscence with keratoplasty: complication of the continuous-suture technique.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;72115- 116Google Scholar
7.
Eagling  EM Perforating eye injuries of the eye.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60732- 736Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Gassett  ARDohlman  CH The tensile strength of corneal weakness.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;79595- 602Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Taylor  DMAtlas  BFRomanchuck  ALStern  AL Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.  Ophthalmology. 1983;9019- 24Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Rehany  URumelt  S Visual outcome and complications following penetrating keratoplasty combined with scleral fixation of posterior-chamber IOL.  Eur J Implant Refractive Surg. 1993;5247- 250Google ScholarCrossref
Clinical Sciences
October 1998

Ocular Trauma Following Penetrating Keratoplasty: Incidence, Outcome, and Postoperative Recommendations

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Western Galilee–Nahariya Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(10):1282-1286. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.10.1282
Abstract

Background  The surgical wound after penetrating keratoplasty is more vulnerable to contusive trauma than the intact cornea.

Objectives  To assess the incidence of ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty, and to evaluate its causative factors, management, and visual outcome.

Setting  Tertiary referral facility in a fairly closed population.

Methods  Retrospective study assessing ocular injuries of all 559 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty in the center between September 1986 and March 1993.

Results  Fourteen (2.5%) of 559 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, over a period of 78 months, suffered surgical wound dehiscence because of contusive ocular trauma. The mean age of the patients (30.6 years) was significantly lower (P<.001) than that of the total number of patients who received transplants (49 years). The interval between transplantation and trauma ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years (mean interval, 6.7 months). In 11 of the 14 patients the trauma occurred prior to removal of sutures. Globe rupture occurred at the donor-recipient interface in all of the patients, accompanied by vitreous and lens loss in 8 patients (57%). In 2 patients (14%) trauma included disruption of retinal tissue resulting in poor visual outcome. The trauma occurred most often at home (in 7 patients). After follow-up periods of 1 to 6 years (mean, 29 months), the corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/120 to 20/20 in 12 patients (86%).

Conclusions  Ocular injury following penetrating keratoplasty is not a rare event. Since corneal graft wound is vulnerable to ocular trauma, we recommend the constant use of protective eyewear and periodically instruct the patients on the long-term vulnerability of the graft wound. Patients should be repeatedly cautioned against high-risk environments and strenuous activity.

×