Sebaceous gland carcinoma usually arises from meibomian or Zeis glands deep within the eyelid, but it can rarely arise within the conjunctival epithelium without a deep component. We describe a woman with a history of chronic blepharoconjunctivitis unresponsive to topical medications. Examination disclosed confluent papillary hypertrophy of the upper palpebral conjunctiva and deposits of white flaky material. Tarsoconjunctival punch biopsy revealed intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma. Management consisted of frozen section–controlled complete tumor excision with removal of the entire posterior lamella of the right upper eyelid, cryotherapy to the margins, and reconstruction. Histopathologic analysis confirmed primary sebaceous gland carcinoma localized to the conjunctival epithelium without involvement of underlying meibomian or Zeis glands or the caruncle. Patients with unexplained chronic unilateral blepharoconjunctivitis or papillary hypertrophy of the palpebral conjunctiva should be considered for biopsy to rule out neoplasia, even when there is no sign of an underlying eyelid mass.
Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the ocular adnexa is a relatively rare tumor that arises from the meibomian glands, Zeis glands, or sebaceous glands in the caruncle or eyebrow.1-7 It is estimated that this cancer represents 1% to 6% of all eyelid malignant neoplasms.4 The clinical presentation of sebaceous gland carcinoma depends on its site of origin. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of meibomian gland origin usually presents as a slowly enlarging, deep tarsal mass that may simulate a chalazion.4 The Zeis gland tumor appears as a well-circumscribed mass near the eyelid margin.3 Some patients have unilateral chronic blepharoconjunctivitis before the tumor is clinically obvious, leading to delay in diagnosis.8 Patients with this presentation generally manifest conjunctival intraepithelial invasion of sebaceous gland carcinoma (pagetoid spread) from a primary focus of tumor in the meibomian or Zeis glands.4,8 Sebaceous gland carcinoma confined to and presumably arising primarily within the conjunctival epithelium without underlying glandular or invasive component is uncommon.8-10 Herein, we describe one such case with supportive histopathologic findings.
A 33-year-old white woman developed contact lens intolerance, conjunctival hyperemia, and irritation in her right eye for 1 year. She had been treated with topical medications for chronic blepharoconjunctivitis without relief. Her only medical problem was idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, treated with varying doses of oral corticosteroids for 14 years. There was no history of radiotherapy to the face or systemic malignancy. On examination, her visual acuity was 20/20 OU. The left eye was unremarkable. The right eye revealed diffuse hyperemic papillary hypertrophy of the entire upper palpebral conjunctiva and scattered deposits of white flaky material (Figure 1A). There was no evident eyelid mass or madarosis. Minimal bulbar conjunctival congestion and diffuse superficial punctate keratopathy were noted. There was no obvious involvement of the bulbar or inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The clinical differential diagnosis included squamous or sebaceous neoplasia of the conjunctiva as well as atypical conjunctival infection. A deep tarsoconjunctival punch biopsy revealed purely intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma without an underlying tarsal component. Map biopsy specimens from 9 other sites on the bulbar and lower palpebral conjunctiva were negative for malignancy. The tumor management involved complete excision of all sebaceous units of the upper eyelid using frozen section–controlled excision of the entire posterior lamella including the eyelid margin (Figure 1B) and cryotherapy to the margins. The defect was reconstructed with a free tarsoconjunctival graft from the opposite upper eyelid. Healing was excellent and all permanent margins were free of tumor. The patient was free of tumor recurrence 1 year after the surgery.
The surgical specimen was received as a single piece of fresh unfixed tissue. A segment of the specimen was submitted for frozen sections and staining for the lipid with oil-red-O stain. The remainder of the specimen was fixed in formalin, sectioned perpendicular to the lid margin in a bread-loaf fashion, and submitted for routine light microscopy. The palpebral conjunctiva was thickened and replaced by tumor cells that had pleomorphic and hyperchromatic nuclei, focally vacuolated cytoplasm, and prominent mitotic activity (Figure 2A-B). The cells stained positively with oil-red-O confirming the presence of intracytoplasmic lipid (Figure 2C). Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the cells were strongly immunoreactive for BRST-2, focally positive for cytokeratin marker CAM 5.2, and minimally immunoreactive for epithelial membrane antigen, consistent with the diagnosis of sebaceous gland carcinoma. Step sections showed that the tumor was confined to the palpebral conjunctiva without deep involvement of the meibomian glands or Zeis glands. The margins of the excised area processed for frozen sections were negative for tumor. The final diagnosis was primary intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma of the palpebral conjunctiva.
In 1967, Theodore11 and Irvine12 described a "masquerade syndrome" characterized by chronic blepharoconjunctivitis due to an unsuspected conjunctival intraepithelial squamous cell or sebaceous gland carcinoma. Although the originally described neoplasms were squamous cell carcinomas, in retrospect, many of the tumors producing this clinical picture may have been sebaceous gland carcinoma.13,14 Others have also emphasized that tarsoconjunctival inflammation is common in patients with intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma of the conjunctiva.8-10
Conjunctival intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma typically arises from an underlying primary meibomian or Zeis gland carcinoma that secondarily invades the conjunctival epithelium by a centripetal or radial migration of tumor cells.8 This has been correlated with poor ocular and life prognosis.6,7 Three histopathologic patterns are exhibited by intraepithelial conjunctival sebaceous gland carcinoma—the bowenoid, pagetoid, and papillary types.6-8 The bowenoid type is characterized by full-thickness replacement of the epithelium by tumor cells that are large and pleomorphic and exhibit prominent mitotic activity. The pagetoid type is characterized by scattered individual tumor cells or nests of tumor cells within the epithelium that are devoid of intercellular bridges. The papillary pattern is rare and manifests with intraepithelial confluent cells resembling carcinoma in situ.8 In our case, the pattern of conjunctival involvement was of the bowenoid type.
It has been estimated that approximately 5% of patients with conjunctival intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma show no detectable eyelid nodule at initial presentation.8 However, this has not been histopathologically proven with step or serial sections in most cases.8-10 Freeman and associates15 described 2 such cases but the histopathologic evidence was inadequate. Margo and associates9 reported one case of a 65-year-old woman whose exenteration specimen showed intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma involving the inferior tarsal and bulbar conjunctiva, with one small focus of invasive tumor of the bulbar conjunctiva. There was extensive scarring of the tarsus but the meibomian and Zeis glands showed no clear-cut source of tumor. Margo and Grossniklaus10 later reported 2 similar cases in a 58-year-old woman and a 71-year-old man, both treated with orbital exenteration. The meibomian and Zeis glands showed no carcinoma but were completely replaced by lipogranulomatous inflammation. Our case was unique in several respects. The tumor occurred in a young patient aged 33 years who had been receiving oral corticosteroids. Immunosuppression may have contributed to the young age at onset of sebaceous neoplasia, as the patient had no other known predisposition, such as radiation exposure.16 In addition, there was no histopathologic evidence of inflammation, scarring, or tumor in the underlying sebaceous glands. The lack of underlying tarsal tumor on histopathologic examination is extremely unusual and raises speculation as to the source of the malignant cells.
The origin of primary conjunctival intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma without deep involvement has been debated.8-10 One argument is that the conjunctival epithelium has the potential to spawn sebaceous gland carcinoma.8 From an embryologic point of view, this is understandable, as the sebaceous glands of the tarsus and caruncle arise from invaginations of the embryonic conjunctival epithelium.17 To support this hypothesis, 2 cases of papillomas of the tarsal conjunctival epithelium with focal sebaceous differentiation have been identified.8 Another theory suggests that glandular sebaceous neoplasms could give rise to intraepithelial spread on the ocular surface followed by spontaneous involution of the glandular component, leaving only intraepithelial disease.10 Last, it should be realized that the presence of a focus of microinvasive or deep glandular tumor cannot fully be eliminated, even by step sectioning of the specimen, as the tumor is known to have skip areas.
The optimal method of treating intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma is controversial. Suggested modalities include careful observation, cryotherapy, radiotherapy, complete excision, and orbital exenteration.4,8-10 We chose complete excision with frozen section control and cryotherapy after map biopsies disclosed no tumor in the remainder of the conjunctiva.
In conclusion, we describe a patient with primary sebaceous gland carcinoma of the conjunctival epithelium without evidence of involvement of the tarsus, Zeis glands, caruncle, or other sites of normal sebaceous glands. Careful follow-up is necessary as the primary tumor site may not yet be evident. Any patient with unexplained asymmetric, chronic blepharoconjunctivitis or papillary hypertrophy of the palpebral conjunctiva should be considered for biopsy to rule out sebaceous gland carcinoma, even in a young patient.
Accepted for publication September 25, 2000.
This work was supported by the Orbis International, New York, NY (Dr Honavar); the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India (Dr Honavar); Eye Tumor Research Foundation, Philadelphia, Pa (Drs J. A. Shields and C. L. Shields); Paul Kayser International Award of Merit in Retina Research, Houston, Tex (Dr J. A. Shields); and Noel T. and Sara L. Simmons Endowment for Ophthalmic Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Eagle).
Corresponding author and reprints: Carol L. Shields, MD, Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, 900 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
1.Shields
JAShields
CL Sebaceous gland carcinoma.
Atlas of Eyelid and Conjunctival Tumors Philadelphia, Pa Lippincott Williams & Wilkins1999;40- 49
Google Scholar 2.De Potter
PShields
CLShields
JA Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelids.
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1993;335- 9
Google ScholarCrossref 3.Shields
JAShields
CL Sebaceous adenocarcinoma of the glands of Zeis.
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;411- 14
Google ScholarCrossref 5.Boniuk
MZimmerman
LE Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid, eyebrow, caruncle and orbit.
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1972;12225- 256
Google Scholar 6.Rao
NAHidayat
AAMcLean
IW
et al. Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular adnexa: a clinicopathologic study of 104 cases, with five-year follow-up data.
Hum Pathol. 1982;13113- 122
Google ScholarCrossref 7.Rao
NAMcLean
IWZimmerman
LE Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid and caruncle: correlation of clinicopathologic features with prognosis. Jakobiec
FAed.
Ocular and Adnexal Tumors Birmingham, Ala Aesculapius Publishing Co1978;461- 476
Google Scholar 8.Jakobiec
FA Sebaceous tumors of the ocular adnexa. Albert
DMJakobiec
FAeds.
Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology 3 Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders1994;1745- 1770
Google Scholar 9.Margo
CELessner
AStern
GA Intraepithelial sebaceous carcinoma of the conjunctiva and the skin of the eyelid.
Ophthalmology. 1992;99227- 231
Google ScholarCrossref 10.Margo
CEGrossniklaus
HE Intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia without underlying invasive carcinoma.
Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39293- 301
Google ScholarCrossref 11.Theodore
FH Conjunctival carcinoma masquerading as chronic conjunctivitis.
Eye Ear Nose Throat Monthly. 1967;461419- 1420
Google Scholar 12.Irvine
AR Diffuse epibulbar squamous cell epithelioma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64550- 554
Google Scholar 14.Irvine
AR Epibulbar squamous cell carcinoma and related lesions.
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1972;1271- 83
Google Scholar 15.Freeman
LNIliff
WJIliff
NTGreen
WR Extramammary Paget's disease/pagetoid change of the conjunctiva without underlying sebaceous gland carcinoma.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29suppl321
Google Scholar 16.Lewallen
SShroyer
KRKeyser
RBLiomba
G Aggressive conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma in three young Africans.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114215- 218
Google ScholarCrossref 17.Ozanics
VJakobiec
FA Prenatal development of the eye and its adnexa. Jakobiec
FAed.
Ocular Anatomy, Embryology and Teratology Philadelphia, Pa Harper & Row1982;11- 96
Google Scholar