Association Between a Centrally Reimbursed Fee Schedule Policy and Access to Cataract Surgery in the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand | Cataract and Other Lens Disorders | JAMA Ophthalmology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
West  S, Sommer  A.  Prevention of blindness and priorities for the future.  Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):244-248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Resnikoff  S, Pascolini  D, Etya’ale  D,  et al.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.  Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844-851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jenchitr  W, Hanutsaha  P, Iamsirithaworn  S, Parnrat  U, Choosri  P.  The National Survey of Blindness, Low Vision and Visual Impairment in Thailand 2006-2007.  Thai J Pub Hlth Ophthalmol.2007;21:11-94.Google Scholar
Isipradit  S, Sirimaharaj  M, Charukamnoetkanok  P,  et al.  The first rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) in Thailand.  PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114245.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
World Health Organization. What is VISION 2020? Accessed February 21, 2017.
World Health Organization.  Global Initiative for Elimination of Avoidable Blindness. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. Document WHO/PBL/97.61 Rev.2.
Lundström  M, Stenevi  U, Thorburn  W.  The Swedish National Cataract Register: a 9-year review.  Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(3):248-257.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Keenan  T, Rosen  P, Yeates  D, Goldacre  M.  Time trends and geographical variation in cataract surgery rates in England: study of surgical workload.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(7):901-904.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Klein  BE, Howard  KP, Lee  KE, Klein  R.  Changing incidence of lens extraction over 20 years: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):5-9.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Erie  JC.  Rising cataract surgery rates: demand and supply.  Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):2-4.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Baltussen  R, Sylla  M, Mariotti  SP.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of cataract surgery: a global and regional analysis.  Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(5):338-345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lansingh  VC, Carter  MJ, Martens  M.  Global cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery.  Ophthalmology. 2007;114(9):1670-1678.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Boudville  AI, Anjou  MD, Taylor  HR.  Indigenous access to cataract surgery: an assessment of the barriers and solutions within the Australian health system.  Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41(2):148-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Batlle  JF, Lansingh  VC, Silva  JC, Eckert  KA, Resnikoff  S.  The cataract situation in Latin America: barriers to cataract surgery.  Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(2):242-250.e1.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Aboobaker  S, Courtright  P.  Barriers to cataract surgery in Africa: a systematic review.  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016;23(1):145-149.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Teerawattananon  K, Butchon  R, Wongkittiruk  K,  et al.  Factors associated with an accessibility of undergoing cataract surgery in Thailand [in Thai].  J Health Sci. 2011;20(S):53-68.Google Scholar
Mass Communication Organization of Thailand. Patients are now happy that the NHSO introduced the reimbursement for cataract surgery [in Thai]. Published December 30, 2011. Accessed February 21, 2017.
National Health Security Office. Annual report. Published 2013. Accessed February 21, 2017.
Low  A, Low  A.  Measuring the gap: quantifying and comparing local health inequalities.  J Public Health (Oxf). 2004;26(4):388-395.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lagarde  M.  How to do (or not to do) …: assessing the impact of a policy change with routine longitudinal data.  Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(1):76-83.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Savin  NE, White  KJ.  The Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors.  Econometrica. 1977;45(8):1989-1996.Google ScholarCrossref
Judge  GG, Griffiths  WE, Hill  RC, Lutkepohl  H, Lee  TC, eds.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1985.
World Health Organization. Cataract surgical rate (CSR). Accessed March 15, 2017.
Sparrow  JM.  Cataract surgical rates: is there overprovision in certain areas?  Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(7):852-853.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
The Medical Council of Thailand. Physician statistics. Accessed April 16, 2018.
Campbell  RJ, El-Defrawy  SR, Bell  CM,  et al.  Effect of cataract surgery volume constraints on recently graduated ophthalmologists: a population-based cohort study.  CMAJ. 2017;189(11):E424-E430.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Houweling  TA, Ronsmans  C, Campbell  OM, Kunst  AE.  Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries.  Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):745-754.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limwattananon  S, Limwattananon  C.  Development of Slope Index of Inequalities in the use of public health services by population in health regions [in Thai].  J Health Systems Res.2017;11(3):427-434.Google Scholar
Limwattananon  C, Limwattananon  S, Sakulpanit  T, Greetong  T, Mills  A, Tangcharoensathien  V.  Different Provider Payment Methods: Variation in Clinical Practice: Lessons From Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: World Bank Country Office; 2008. Country Development Partnership in Health (CDP-H) Research Report.
Limwattananon  S, Limwattananon  C, Cheawchanwattana  A, Silkavute  P, Tangcharoensathien  V.  Forecasted expenditure due to the use of expensive drugs in Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme: a comparison with Universal Health Coverage Scheme [in Thai].  J Health Systems Res. 2011;5(2):170-180.Google Scholar
National Health Security Office. Cataract surgery waiting time survey. Accessed March 15, 2017.
Sangameswaran  RP, Verma  GK, Raghavan  N, Joseph  J, Sivaprakasam  M.  Cataract surgery in mobile eye surgical unit: safe and viable alternative.  Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64(11):835-839.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bennett  S, Agyepong  IA, Sheikh  K, Hanson  K, Ssengooba  F, Gilson  L.  Building the field of health policy and systems research: an agenda for action.  PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001081.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
July 2018

Association Between a Centrally Reimbursed Fee Schedule Policy and Access to Cataract Surgery in the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand

Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  • 2Monitoring and Evaluation Division, National Health Security Office, Bangkok, Thailand
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(7):796-802. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1843
Key Points

Question  What are the trends and variations in cataract surgery access associated with a central reimbursement policy in Thailand?

Findings  In this time series analysis, after implementing a central reimbursement policy, the national cataract surgery rate increased substantially to 765.3 cases per 100 000 population in 2015. The subnational cataract surgery rate gap widened because of rapid uptake in areas with high rates of cataract surgery initially and decreased as overall coverage became adequately large.

Meaning  A central reimbursement policy that mitigated financial constraints of individual health care professionals in a developing country reduced backlogs for cataract surgery and was associated with improved access.


Importance  Uptake of cataract surgery in developing countries is much lower than that in developed countries. Cataract unawareness and financial barriers have been cited as the main causes. Under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), Thailand introduced a central reimbursement (CR) system for cataract surgery. It is unknown if this financial arrangement could incentivize service provision (private or public) in areas that are hard to reach.

Objective  To examine the association between the CR policy and access to cataract surgery in Thailand.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Using time series analysis, hospitalization data during 2005 to 2015 for UCS members were analyzed for time trends and subnational variations in the cataract surgery rate (CSR) before and after the CR implementation.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The annual growth in access was estimated using segmented regression. The CSR gap across regions was determined by the slope index of inequality (SII). Unequal access across districts was represented by the gap between the top and bottom quintiles.

Results  During 2005 to 2015, a total of 0.98 million UCS members (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [11.2] years; 58.7% female) received cataract surgery. The number of cases increased from 77 897 in 2005 to 192 290 in 2015. At the national level, the CSR per 100 000 population increased from 352.0 to 378.7 cases in 2005 to 2008, to 716.3 cases in 2013, and then to 765.3 cases in 2015. With the use of mobile services through an exclusive CR, 3 private hospitals took the lead in service growth, sharing 79.2% of cases in the private sector in 2009. From 2010, the number of cases in public hospitals grew yearly by 12.6% to 13.6% until 2012, rose 21.7% in 2013, and then the rate of increase declined to that of 8.2% to 8.3% in 2014-2015. During the periods of an increase in overall access, the CSR gap across regions widened as indicated by the SII of 755.4 cases per 100 000 population in 2010 because of rapid uptake in areas with mobile services. When the national CSR became adequately large and mobile services were discouraged in 2013, the gap in 2014-2015 narrowed.

Conclusions and Relevance  This study found that the appropriate payment and service designs helped reduce the cataract surgery backlog. With an adequately high CSR, Thailand is on track to reach the VISION 2020 goal, aiming for blindness elimination by the year 2020, which has been achieved by most developed countries.