[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
December 2001

Lone-Star Tick Bite of the Conjunctiva

Author Affiliations
 

W. RICHARDGREENMD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1854-1855. doi:

We report 2 separate occurrences of lone-star tick bite to the conjunctiva. Both occurred within a 100-mile radius during the summer of 2000. A search of the literature yielded 2 reports of conjunctival tick bite.1,2 In one of these, the tick was removed with difficulty using a cotton-tipped applicator. We propose a simple, yet effective, method of removal.

Case Reports

Case 1

On July 9, 2000, a 5-year-old girl was evaluated by her physician for an unidentified "spot" on her right eye. A tick and the surrounding area of erythema were identified in the conjunctiva temporally in the right eye (Figure 1). The remainder of the ocular examination findings were normal. Following referral to Arkansas Children's Hospital (Little Rock), conscious sedation with ketamine and midazolam allowed the complete removal of the tick and a small amount of the surrounding conjunctiva with forceps and Westcott scissors. Two weeks later, a follow-up telephone call revealed the patient to be doing well, having been seen twice by her personal ophthalmologist.

Patient with Amblyomma americanum tick attached
to conjunctiva temporally in the right eye. Magnified view illustrates leg
(arrow) of tick.

Patient with Amblyomma americanum tick attached to conjunctiva temporally in the right eye. Magnified view illustrates leg (arrow) of tick.

Case 2

On August 8, 2000, a 2-year-old girl was seen in the emergency department for evaluation of tick bites. An ocular foreign body prompted an ophthalmological consultation and identification of a tick attached to the conjunctiva of her left eye. Conscious sedation with ketamine and midazolam allowed removal of the tick and surrounding conjunctiva with forceps and Westcott scissors. One week later, there was no sign of infection or other abnormality.

Comment

The lone-star tick, identified in these 2 cases, is the common name for Amblyomma americanum. The life cycle is composed of the egg, larva, nymph, and adult stages of development. The egg hatches into a 6-legged larva ("seed" tick), which attaches to a host and feeds. The larva then drops off the host and metamorphoses into an 8-legged nymph. The nymph reattaches to feed and later metamorphoses into an adult. The adult is differentiated into male and female.

The distinctive morphological features of the species of Amblyomma were described by G. Neumann in 1896.3 The female tick is larger than the male counterpart. On the scutum, or dorsal hard plate, of both the male and female are intermittent white spots, hence the name "lone-star tick." These spots are typically more prominent on the female than on the male. The female can have red and green markings in addition.

A americanum is known to be a transmitter of diseases to domestic animals and to humans. Published reports by Maria Maver (1911) of Rocky Mountain spotted fever rickettsia transmission by A americanum in guinea pigs led to the hypothesis that spotted fever could be transmitted to humans by this tick vector. In 1943, extraction of spotted fever rickettsia from an A americanum nymph was reported.3Amblyomma has also been demonstrated to be a carrier of tularemia and an erythema migrans–like rash illness similar to Lyme disease.4 As a known carrier of a number of diseases, A americanum poses a threat to humans. It probably accounts for most tick infestations in the United States, especially in the south central states.5 Complete removal is thought to lessen the potential for transmission.6

As activities move to the outdoors during the summer months, tick bites, especially on exposed areas of the body, may occur even after a short time in wooded areas. At least 4 hours of tick attachment are thought to be necessary for spotted fever rickettsia transmission in humans.7 Preventive measures include complete removal of the tick; care must be taken not to leave mouth parts in the skin or to divide the tick's body. Residual crushed tissue and feces can also transmit disease. In the past, to avoid rupture or incomplete removal of the tick, lindane shampoo, deodorized kerosene, ether, or iodine were used.8,9 Since the tick bites we report involved the conjunctiva, mechanical extraction was the procedure of choice. We add our cases of conjunctival tick bite to the literature with a suggested method for removal.

This work was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY.

Corresponding author: Christopher T. Westfall, MD, 4301 W Markham, Mail Slot 523, Little Rock, AR 72205 (e-mail: westfallchristopher@exchange.uams.edu).

References
1.
Bode  DSpeicher  PHarlan  H A seed tick infestation of the conjunctiva:  Amblyomma americanum larva. Ann Ophthalmol. 1987;1963- 64Google Scholar
2.
Jensen  ALSnow  LRClifford  CM Spinose ear tick, Otobius megnini, attached to the conjunctiva of a child's eye [letter].  J Parasitol. 1982;68528Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Cooley  RAKohls  GM The genus Amblyomma (Ixodidae) in the Unites States.  J Parasitol. 1944;3077- 111Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Kirkland  KBKlimko  TB Erythema migrans-like rash illness at a camp in North Carolina: a new tick-borne disease?  Arch Intern Med. 1997;1572635Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Chandler  ACClark  PR Introduction to Parasitology. 10th ed. New York, NY John Wiley & Sons Inc1961;570- 579
6.
Busvine  JR Discovery of unsuspected dangers.  Disease Transmission by Insects: Its Discovery and Ninety Years of Effort to Prevent It. New York, NY Springer-Verlag1993;82Google Scholar
7.
Benenson  ASed Tick-borne rickettsiosies.  Control of Communicable Diseases in Men. 14th ed. Springfield, Va American Public Health Association1985;329Google Scholar
8.
Jones  BE Human "seed tick" infestation: Amblyomma americanum larvae.  Arch Dermatol. 1981;117812- 818Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Knight  KLBryan  DETaylor  CW Studies on the removal of embedded lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum.  J Econ Entomol. 1962;55273- 276Google Scholar
×