[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Typical measurement locations for ocular fundus pulsation measurement as selected in 1 patient.

Typical measurement locations for ocular fundus pulsation measurement as selected in 1 patient.

Table 1. 
Characteristics of Patients With Active Unilateral Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Characteristics of Patients With Active Unilateral Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Table 2. 
Individual Fundus Pulsation Amplitude (FPA) in the Fovea of Patients With Active Unilateral Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)
Individual Fundus Pulsation Amplitude (FPA) in the Fovea of Patients With Active Unilateral Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)
1.
Bennett  G Central serous retinopathy.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1955;39605- 618Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Harrington  DO Psychosomatic interrelationship in ophthalmology.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1948;311241- 1251Google Scholar
3.
Gelber  GSSchatz  H Loss of vision due to central serous chorioretinopathy following psychological stress.  Am J Psychiatry. 1987;14446- 50PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Jain  ISSingh  K Maculopathy: a corticosteroid side-effect.  J All India Ophthalmol Soc. 1966;14250- 252PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Bouzas  EAScott  MHMastorakos  SChrousos  GPKaiser-Kupfer  MI Central serous chorioretinopathy in endogenous hypercortisolism.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;1111229- 1233PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Polak  BCBaarsma  GSSnyders  B Diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy complicating systemic corticosteroid treatment.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79922- 925PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Wakakura  MIshikawa  S Central serous chorioretinopathy complicating systemic corticosteroid therapy.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68329- 331PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Yannuzzi  LA Type A behavior and central serous chorioretinopathy.  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84799- 845PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Tittl  MKSpaide  RFWong  D  et al.  Systemic findings associated with central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;12863- 68PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Bernasconi  PMessmer  EBernasconi  AThölen  A Assessment of the sympatho-vagal interaction in central serous chorioretinopathy measured by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236571- 576PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Friedman  MByers  SODiamant  JRosenman  RH Plasma catecholamine response of coronary-prone subjects (type A) to a specific challenge.  Metabolism. 1975;24205- 210PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Williams  RB  JrLane  JDKuhn  CMMelosh  WWhite  ADSchanberg  SM Type A behavior and elevated physiological and neuroendocrine responses to cognitive tasks.  Science. 1982;218483- 485PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Yoshioka  HKatsume  YAkune  H Experimental central serous chorioretinopathy in monkey eyes: fluorescein angiographic findings.  Ophthalmologica. 1982;185168- 178PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Guyer  DRYannuzzi  LASlakter  JSSorenson  JAHo  AOrlock  DA Digital indocyanine green videoangiography of central serous chorioretinopathy.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;1121057- 1062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Hayashi  KHasegawa  YTokoro  T Indocyanine green angiography of central serous chorioretinopathy.  Int Ophthalmol. 1986;937- 41PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Prunte  CFlammer  J Choroidal capillary and venous congestion in central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;12126- 34PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Prunte  CFlammer  J Zirkulationsstörungen der Aderhaut bei Patienten mit Chorioretinopathia centralis serosa [Circulatory disorders of the choroid in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy].  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1996;208337- 339PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Schmetterer  LLexer  FUnfried  CSattmann  HFercher  A Topical measurement of fundus pulsations.  Opt Eng. 1995;34711- 716Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Schmetterer  LDallinger  SFindl  O  et al.  Noninvasive investigations of the normal ocular circulation in humans.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;391210- 1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Schmetterer  LDallinger  SFindl  OEichler  HGWolzt  M A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation and pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow, 1: baseline considerations.  Eye. 2000;1439- 45PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Bill  ASperber  GO Control of retinal and choroidal blood flow.  Eye. 1990;4319- 325PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Longo  AGeiser  MRiva  CE Subfoveal choroidal blood flow in response to light-dark exposure.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;412678- 2683PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Fuchsjäger-Mayrl  GPolska  EMalec  MSchmetterer  L Unilateral light-dark transitions affect choroidal blood flow in both eyes.  Vision Res. 2001;412919- 2924PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Prunte  CHaufschild  TShaw  SGFlammer  J Increased endothelin-1 plasma levels in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy [abstract].  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41S358Google Scholar
25.
Iijima  HIida  TMurayama  KImai  MGohdo  T Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127477- 478PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Scheider  ANasemann  JELund  OE Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies of central serous chorioretinopathy by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;11550- 56PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Nishiyama  YMori  KMurayama  KYoneya  S Quantitative analysis of indocyanine green angiographic image in central serous chorioretinopathy [abstract].  Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45116PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Schmetterer  LKruger  AFindl  OBreiteneder  HEichler  HGWolzt  M Topical fundus pulsation measurements in age-related macular degeneration.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236160- 163PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Clinical Sciences
July 2003

Topical Fundus Pulsation Measurement in Patients With Active Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Ophthalmology and Optometry (Drs Tittl, Kircher, Kruger, Maar, and Stur) and Clinical Pharmacology (Drs Polska and Schmetterer), and the Institute of Medical Physics (Dr Schmetterer), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(7):975-978. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.7.975
Abstract

Objective  To determine regional pulsatile choroidal blood flow using laser interferometry in patients with active central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Method  The study compared an equally sized age-, sex-, and refractive error–matched control group of healthy volunteers obtained from the Department of Clinical Pharmacology with 18 consecutive patients who had newly diagnosed active, unilateral CSC obtained from the University of Vienna Eye Clinic, Vienna, Austria.

Main Outcome Measures  Regional fundus pulsation amplitude as assessed using laser interferometry.

Results  The median age of the patients was 40 years; the male-female ratio was 16:2. Foveal fundus pulsation amplitude was significantly higher in eyes with CSC (mean [SD], 5.5 [1.7] µm) than in the eyes of the control subjects(4.1 [1.1] µm; P = .005). In addition, eyes with CSC had a significantly higher variability in fundus pulsation amplitude(mean [SD], 48% [20%]) assessed at different fundus locations around the leak than the controls did (20% [9%]; P<.001).

Conclusions  To our knowledge, this is the first study that measures topical fundus pulsations in patients who have active, unilateral CSC. These data indicate a generally increased foveal pulsatile choroidal blood flow and an abnormal distribution of fundus pulsation amplitude in the area close to the leak. Whether these findings reinforce the concept that choroidal perfusion abnormalities play a role in the pathogenesis of CSC remains to be established.

CENTRAL SEROUS chorioretinopathy (CSC) is an exudative macular disease that predominantly affects young to middle-aged men. The characteristic neurosensory detachment on the posterior pole is caused by leakage of fluid seen at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium. Mental stress1-3 and hypercortisolism4-7 are factors frequently associated with the precipitation or aggravation of CSC. Cardiovascular factors that have been linked to CSC are a type A personality, 8 systemic hypertension, 9 and an increased variable heart beat.10 It is believed that psychological stress, especially in men, leads to a hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system with an abnormal neuroendocrine response of endogenous catecholamine and cortisol concentrations.11,12 In fact, experimental studies on animals were able to create an ocular condition similar to CSC owing to repeated injections of these hormones.13

Angiographic images of the fundus seen in patients who have CSC frequently reveal vascular patterns like choroidal hyperpermeability, 14,15 localized choroidal filling delays, or venous congestion that may be characteristic of CSC.16,17 Despite the current technical limitations in choroidal angiography, these observations raised the discussion about whether the choroid is involved in the pathophysiology of CSC. Given the fact that there is only little quantitative data about choroidal hemodynamics in this ocular disease, our aim was to investigate regional pulsatile choroidal blood flow using laser interferometry in patients who had active, unilateral CSC.

Methods
Patients and healthy control subjects

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of University of Vienna School of Medicine, Vienna, Austria, and followed the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed a written informed consent. All patients were seen and their conditions were diagnosed in the medical retina referral center of the university eye clinic. The study compared an equally sized age-, sex-, and refractive error–matched control group of healthy volunteers with a group of consecutive patients newly diagnosed for active, unilateral CSC, meeting the inclusion criteria. The clinically unaffected partner eyes of the patients with CSC served as a second control group.

Definitions

To meet the inclusion criteria of this study, all participants had to have an unremarkable general medical and ocular history with no present use of medications or tobacco. A complete ophthalmic examination was performed, including slitlamp biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. An acute, unilateral neurosensory detachment localized in the macula had to be discernible in all patients. All patients were newly diagnosed as having CSC with no documented history of the disease. Any participant with ametropia higher than 3.0 diopters(D) in either eye was excluded from the study. To establish the diagnosis, standard fluorescein angiography was performed to document that the localized macular detachment is attributed to a distinct leak or leaks within the temporal vascular arcades typically evident in active CSC. Other possible causes for the exudation such as inflammation, infiltration, or choroidal neovascularization ruled out a candidate.

Fundus pulsation amplitude, mean arterial blood pressure, and pulse rate

Fundus pulsation synchronous with the cardiac cycle was recorded using laser interferometry.18 In previous studies, this noninvasive method has proven to detect small hemodynamic changes with excellent reproducibility.19 Laser interferometry uses a coherent laser beam with a wavelength of 780 nm and 80 µW of power. The coherent laser beam illuminates the eye along the optical axis producing a 20- to 50-µm measurement spot on the retina. The laser light gets reflected from the anterior surface of the cornea and the fundus. This allows for the recording of interference fringes generated from the pulse synchronous relative distance changes between cornea and retina. The maximum distance change between the cornea and the fundus during a cardiac cycle is termed "fundus pulsation amplitude" (FPA). Fundus pulsation amplitude served as the main outcome factor in the present study and estimates local pulsatile blood flow.19,20 The interferometer is coupled to a fundus camera (model FK 30; Karl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), which allows continuous visual control of the topographic alignment and focus of the laser spot on the retina. According to the protocol, FPA was measured in the fovea by asking the subject to fixate directly at the beam, which appeared as a red dot to the participant. In addition, the FPA was assessed at preselected points that were chosen based on fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms. One measurement locus was the leak itself and up to 4 additional retinal measurement points were selected that were located within 1 disc diameter around the leak. In the controls just the right eyes were studied, where fundus pulsations were detected at corresponding fundus locations.

The mean arterial blood pressure was measured with an automated oscillometric device on the participant's right arm (CMS-patient monitor; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif). Pulse rate was automatically recorded from a finger-oxymetric device (CMS-patient monitor; Hewlett-Packard).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. A sample size calculation was considered to find a 10% difference of the main outcome measure to be statistically significant at α = .05. χ2 Analysis with continuity correction was used for categorical analysis. The paired and unpaired t tests were used to compare group means of continuous variables. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistica software package (Release 4.5; Stat Soft Inc, Tulsa, Okla). All tests used were 2-sided with statistical significance set at P<.05. Data are given as mean (SD).

Results

Based on the exclusion-inclusion criteria a total of 18 patients with active, unilateral CSC and 18 controls were included in the study. The descriptive characteristics of the patients who had active, unilateral CSC are given in Table 1. Both study groups had a male-female ratio of 16:2. The mean age of the patients who had CSC was 42 (10) years(age range, 31-68 years). The mean age of the controls was 40 (16) years (age range, 24-71 years; P = .65). The mean arterial blood pressure tended to be higher in patients with CSC (99 [13] mmHg) than in the controls (94 [13] mmHg), but this value was not significantly different(P = .18). Pulse pressure amplitude (64 [8] mmHgin patients with CSC; 62 [7] mmHg in the controls; P =.77) and pulse rate (patients with CSC, 77 [13]/min; controls, 76 [11]/min; P = .87) were comparable between the 2 study groups.

Typical measurement locations as selected in 1 patient are shown in Figure 1. Table 2 lists individual foveal FPA measurements for both groups. Foveal FPA was significantly higher in the eyes of patients who had CSC (5.5[1.7] µm) than in the eyes of the controls (4.1 [1.1] µm; P = .005). Foveal FPAs in the eyes of the patients who had CSC were also elevated compared with the patients' unaffected partner eyes (4.6 [1.2] µm; P = .047). However, there was some, but a statistically insignificant, difference between the foveal FPA in the eyes of the controls and the one in the unaffected partner eyes of patients who had CSC (P = .07).

The FPA, as measured directly on the leak, was 5.3 (1.8) µm. In healthy subjects the FPA values measured on the corresponding fundus locations were significantly lower (3.9 [0.8] µm; P =.007). The coefficient of variation of FPAs around the leak was also calculated. This point-to-point variability was significantly higher in patients with active CSC (48% [20%]) than in the controls (20% [9%]; P<.001).

Comment

In the present study laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation was chosen to gain insight into choroidal circulation in patients with CSC. In this study 18 consecutive patients with active, unilateral CSC were compared with an equally sized control group of healthy volunteers to assess the magnitude of the pulsatile choroidal blood flow in active CSC. The results clearly indicate that patients with active CSC have higher than normal amplitudes of ocular fundus pulsation in the macular area compared with healthy control eyes and with the unaffected partner eye. In addition, the local variability of FPA in the area of the leak is larger in the patients with CSC than in the controls. These results suggest that at least the pulsatile component of choroidal blood flow is altered in active CSC.

In general, blood flow is determined by the perfusion pressure, the tone of the peripheral resistance vessels, and rheological properties. As the pulsatile blood flow is a part of the entire blood flow, one may speculate that the alteration of the pulsatile choroidal blood flow in CSC must be caused by at least one of the abovementioned factors. Under stress, human circulation and homeostasis undergo numerous changes, which may, in turn, alter systemic hemodynamics. However, none of the systemic factors measured in this study showed any significant difference between the patients with active CSC and the controls. This is particularly true for pulse pressure amplitude, which is the driving force of pulsatile blood flow. Hence, we assume that the detected phenomenon of increased FPA is unlikely to be only a propagated cardial phenomenon. The high regional variability in FPA also suggests that our observation represents more of a localized problem.

Since this disease occurs rather early in a person's life, we assume that tonal flexibility of the choroidal vessels may be of certain relevance, especially compared with arteriosclerotic and hypertensive changes in the choroid that appear later in life. Although it is said that the choroidal circulation is under neural control, we do not know until now to what extent.21 However, recent studies clearly indicate neural control mechanisms occur in the human choroid.22,23 Our observation may be compatible with the concept that the choroidal regulatory abilities are limited or are altered in CSC. Recently, a study provided evidence for altered endothelial function in patients with CSC and increased plasma endothelin 1 levels were reported.24 Because the level of endothelin 1 is typically elevated when shear stress on the endothelium is evident, this, indeed, may be compatible with our results and angiographic observations that there is a strong local variability of choroidal blood flow around the leak with choroidal hyperperfusion. Furthermore, plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 are found to be significantly increased in patients who have CSC, thus, supporting the concept that the choroidal vasculature is involved in the pathogenetic process.25 However, to our knowledge, in vivo studies on endothelial dysfunction in patients with CSC have not yet been performed.

The angiographic appearance of active as well as chronic CSC is clearly described.14-17,26,27 Our findings may reflect what is seen in angiographic studies. The strong regional differences of the FPA indicate higher than normal variability in choroidal hemodynamics. In the controls the FPA is higher in the fovea than in peripheral parts of the retina.20,28 In an area of 15° around the fovea, there is, however, little variation of FPA in healthy subjects20 as also evidenced from the results of the present study. The regional variability of the FPA in patients with CSC may indicate local perfusion abnormalities in the choroid of eyes with CSC. Local perfusion changes were also proposed based on angiographic findings with the numerous patches of discrete choroidal hyperfluorescence attributed as multifocal choroidal hyperpermeability. Hayashi et al15 demonstrated localized perfusion abnormalities presumed as focal choroidal ischemia.15 Focal leakage of indocyanine green dye at the level of the choroicapillaris and patches of hyperfluorescence in otherwise unaffected areas in late-transit phases were described.15 Most authors share the impression that this multifocal choroidal vascular hyperpermeability seen on indocyanine green angiography is common and, therefore, a characteristic feature in patients with CSC.14-16,26 Prunte and Flammer16 formulated a causal chain of pathophysiologic changes where a lobular arterial filling delay causes focal ischemia followed by capillary and venous congestion leading to choroidal hyperpermeability. Moreover, Prunte and Flammer postulated that choroidal hyperpermeability was only detected in areas of previous vascular congestion. Direct comparison of FPA measurements with angiographic findings is, however, difficult. On the one hand, the sites of FPA measurements were chosen directly adjacent to the leakage point which hampers local correlation with indocyanine green angiograms. On the other hand, it is difficult to extract quantitative data of choroidal blood flow based on angiography. Hence, focal ischemia as proposed by several authors is not a contradiction to increased choroidal blood flow as indicated based on our results.

Conclusions

We have shown that patients with active, unilateral CSC have increased FPA in the fovea compared with controls. In addition, our data indicate an abnormal local variability of FPA in the region of the leak. This may reinforce the concept that CSC is a widespread choroidal disease.

Corresponding author: Leopold Schmetterer, PhD, Institute of Medical Physics, University of Vienna, Währinger Strasse 13, 1090 Vienna, Austria(e-mail: Leopold.Schmetterer@univie.ac.at).

Submitted for publication June 17, 2002; final revision received February 12, 2003; accepted February 20, 2003.

This study was supported by grant 1853 from Bürgermeisterfonds der Stadt Wien, Vienna, Austria.

References
1.
Bennett  G Central serous retinopathy.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1955;39605- 618Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Harrington  DO Psychosomatic interrelationship in ophthalmology.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1948;311241- 1251Google Scholar
3.
Gelber  GSSchatz  H Loss of vision due to central serous chorioretinopathy following psychological stress.  Am J Psychiatry. 1987;14446- 50PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Jain  ISSingh  K Maculopathy: a corticosteroid side-effect.  J All India Ophthalmol Soc. 1966;14250- 252PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Bouzas  EAScott  MHMastorakos  SChrousos  GPKaiser-Kupfer  MI Central serous chorioretinopathy in endogenous hypercortisolism.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;1111229- 1233PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Polak  BCBaarsma  GSSnyders  B Diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy complicating systemic corticosteroid treatment.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79922- 925PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Wakakura  MIshikawa  S Central serous chorioretinopathy complicating systemic corticosteroid therapy.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68329- 331PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Yannuzzi  LA Type A behavior and central serous chorioretinopathy.  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84799- 845PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Tittl  MKSpaide  RFWong  D  et al.  Systemic findings associated with central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;12863- 68PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Bernasconi  PMessmer  EBernasconi  AThölen  A Assessment of the sympatho-vagal interaction in central serous chorioretinopathy measured by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236571- 576PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Friedman  MByers  SODiamant  JRosenman  RH Plasma catecholamine response of coronary-prone subjects (type A) to a specific challenge.  Metabolism. 1975;24205- 210PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Williams  RB  JrLane  JDKuhn  CMMelosh  WWhite  ADSchanberg  SM Type A behavior and elevated physiological and neuroendocrine responses to cognitive tasks.  Science. 1982;218483- 485PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Yoshioka  HKatsume  YAkune  H Experimental central serous chorioretinopathy in monkey eyes: fluorescein angiographic findings.  Ophthalmologica. 1982;185168- 178PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Guyer  DRYannuzzi  LASlakter  JSSorenson  JAHo  AOrlock  DA Digital indocyanine green videoangiography of central serous chorioretinopathy.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;1121057- 1062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Hayashi  KHasegawa  YTokoro  T Indocyanine green angiography of central serous chorioretinopathy.  Int Ophthalmol. 1986;937- 41PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Prunte  CFlammer  J Choroidal capillary and venous congestion in central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;12126- 34PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Prunte  CFlammer  J Zirkulationsstörungen der Aderhaut bei Patienten mit Chorioretinopathia centralis serosa [Circulatory disorders of the choroid in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy].  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1996;208337- 339PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Schmetterer  LLexer  FUnfried  CSattmann  HFercher  A Topical measurement of fundus pulsations.  Opt Eng. 1995;34711- 716Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Schmetterer  LDallinger  SFindl  O  et al.  Noninvasive investigations of the normal ocular circulation in humans.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;391210- 1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Schmetterer  LDallinger  SFindl  OEichler  HGWolzt  M A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation and pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow, 1: baseline considerations.  Eye. 2000;1439- 45PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Bill  ASperber  GO Control of retinal and choroidal blood flow.  Eye. 1990;4319- 325PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Longo  AGeiser  MRiva  CE Subfoveal choroidal blood flow in response to light-dark exposure.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;412678- 2683PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Fuchsjäger-Mayrl  GPolska  EMalec  MSchmetterer  L Unilateral light-dark transitions affect choroidal blood flow in both eyes.  Vision Res. 2001;412919- 2924PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Prunte  CHaufschild  TShaw  SGFlammer  J Increased endothelin-1 plasma levels in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy [abstract].  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41S358Google Scholar
25.
Iijima  HIida  TMurayama  KImai  MGohdo  T Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in central serous chorioretinopathy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127477- 478PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Scheider  ANasemann  JELund  OE Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies of central serous chorioretinopathy by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;11550- 56PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Nishiyama  YMori  KMurayama  KYoneya  S Quantitative analysis of indocyanine green angiographic image in central serous chorioretinopathy [abstract].  Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45116PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Schmetterer  LKruger  AFindl  OBreiteneder  HEichler  HGWolzt  M Topical fundus pulsation measurements in age-related macular degeneration.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236160- 163PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×