[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
February 2006

Spinal Fluid Leak After Chiropractic Manipulation of the Cervical Spine

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(2):283. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.2.283

Intracranial hypotension (ICH) caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a well-documented cause of severe headaches and neurologic deficits. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks most often occur as a complication of neurosurgical procedures, in particular lumbar puncture, or after accidental trauma.

Report of a Case

A 51-year-old woman had binocular horizontal diplopia for 4 weeks. She reported having headaches for several weeks, which had been treated by her chiropractor. After receiving cervical spinal manipulation on 3 separate occasions, she did not experience relief but instead escalation of the headache. One week after the last chiropractic treatment, she developed binocular horizontal diplopia prompting neuro-ophthalmic evaluation. Her visual function and ocular fundus were normal. Ocular motility testing revealed a right cranial nerve VI palsy with a 20–prism diopter (PD) esotropia (ET) in primary gaze, upgaze, and downgaze; 35-PD ET in right gaze; and 1-PD ET in left gaze. Magnetic resonance imaging showed diffuse enhancement of the meninges and obliteration of the foramen magnum, suggestive of ICH (Figure A). Computed tomography–myelography of the cervical spine demonstrated a CSF leak at the level of C2 (Figure B), which was thought to be the causative lesion and treated with a blood patch. This led to prompt headache relief, but the diplopia, which had been worsening before intervention, did not resolve immediately. Ten days later, she had a 30-PD ET in primary gaze, increasing to 40 PD in right gaze with a 20% right abduction deficit. Since the patient was now headache free, she was followed up without further intervention. The ocular misalignment resolved completely over the ensuing 5 months.

Figure. 
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography–myelography of the cervical spine. A, Sagittal T1-weighted image shows diffuse enhancement of the meninges (arrows). There is obliteration of the foramen magnum secondary to thickened meninges (arrowhead). B, Myelography–computed tomography demonstrates contrast medium in the thecal sac (arrowhead) and leakage of contrast into the left paraspinal soft tissue (arrows) at the level of C2.

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography–myelography of the cervical spine. A, Sagittal T1-weighted image shows diffuse enhancement of the meninges (arrows). There is obliteration of the foramen magnum secondary to thickened meninges (arrowhead). B, Myelography–computed tomography demonstrates contrast medium in the thecal sac (arrowhead) and leakage of contrast into the left paraspinal soft tissue (arrows) at the level of C2.

Comment

Forceful flexion and distension of the cervical spine is a well-established mechanism for causing dural tears and ICH.1 But even small insults, like Valsalva maneuvers, may lead to CSF leakage, usually in conjunction with a focal weakness of the thecal sac.2 There are only a few reports of dural tears with CSF leakage and ICH after chiropractic manipulation, none of which recount any neurologic symptoms besides headache. In our patient's case, headache that worsened after each manipulation and the appearance of cranial nerve VI palsy shortly thereafter strongly suggest a cause-effect relationship between spinal manipulation and the radiologically proven CSF leak. Interestingly, the patient did not associate her escalating headache with the previous chiropractic treatment. This reflects a common public conception of the innocuous nature of chiropractic maneuvers. In fact, the estimated complication rate of chiropractic treatment ranges from 1.3 in 100 000 to 1 in 2 million manipulations3 with the most frequent serious complication being cerebral or cerebellar stroke caused by dissection or occlusion of the vertebral or internal carotid artery.4 Fortunately, unlike stroke, neurologic deficits caused by ICH usually resolve, albeit slowly, once normal intracranial pressure has been reestablished.

Correspondence: Dr Mathews, University of Maryland, 419 W Redwood St, Suite 470, Baltimore, MD 21201 (m.km@earthlink.net).

Financial Disclosure: None.

References
1.
De Gelb  DLenke  LPond  J Dural tear associated with a flexion distraction subluxation to the cervical spine without neurologic injury.  Acta Orthop Belg 1998;64224- 228PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Fujimaki  HSaito  NTosaka  M  et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid leak demonstrated by three-dimensional computed tomographic myelography in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.  Surg Neurol 2002;58280- 285PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Stevinson  CErnst  E Risks associated with spinal manipulation.  Am J Med 2002;112566- 571PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Devereaux  MW The neuro-ophthalmologic complications of cervical manipulation.  J Neuroophthalmol 2000;20236- 239PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×