Objective
To identify the gene causing retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in an autosomal dominant pedigree.
Methods
Family members with RP were studied with linkage analysis using single-nucleotide polymorphism and short tandem repeat polymorphic markers. Candidate genes in the linked region were evaluated with DNA sequencing.
Results
Nineteen family members had a mild form of RP. Multipoint linkage analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes yielded a maximum nonparametric linkage score of 19.97 with markers located on chromosome 14q. LOD scores higher than 3.0 were obtained with 20 short tandem repeat polymorphic markers, and recombinants defined a 21.7-centimorgan locus on chromosome 14q. The retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) gene lies within this locus and was evaluated as a candidate gene. A frameshift mutation (776delG) was detected in all affected family members and was not detected in 158 control subjects.
Conclusions
Heterozygous mutations in RDH12can cause autosomal dominant RP with a late onset and relatively mild severity. This phenotype is dramatically different from the other disease associated with mutation in this gene, autosomal recessive Leber congenital amaurosis.
Clinical Relevance
The demonstration that mutations in a gene previously associated with recessive Leber congenital amaurosis can also cause dominant RP illustrates the wide phenotypic variability of retinal degeneration genes.
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a collection of inherited, progressive retinal degenerations of the photoreceptors with typical clinical features including attenuated retinal arterioles, intraretinal bone spiculelike pigmentation, and posterior subcapsular cataract. Retinitis pigmentosa is characterized by marked reduction of both rod and cone responses in the electroretinogram, peripheral visual field defects, and reduction of central vision later in the course of the disease. The prevalence of RP is approximately 1 in 4000 and more than 1 million individuals may be affected with RP worldwide.1
Details of the genetic features of RP have been recently reviewed.1-3Retinitis pigmentosa may have an autosomal dominant (30%-40%), autosomal recessive (50%-60%), or X-linked (5%-15%) inheritance pattern.1At present, 16 genetic loci for autosomal dominant RP (ADRP) have been identified and the genes at 14 of the loci have been discovered (RetNet: http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/). The 14 known ADRP genes are CA4,4,5CRX,6,7FSCN2,8GUCA1B,9IMPDH1,10-12NR2E3,13NRL,14PRPF3,15,16PRPF8,17,18PRPF31,19,20RDS,21,22RHO,23-26ROM1,27RP1,28-31RP9,32,33and SEMA4A.34These genes have a range of functions, including phototransduction (RHO); RNA splicing (PRPF3, PRPF8, PRPF9, and PRPF31); signaling (SEMA4A); and retinal structure (RDS/peripherin, FSCN2, and RP1). Mutations associated with ADRP are most commonly detected in rhodopsin (RHO), RDS/peripherin, and PPRF31, which account for approximately 25%, 10%, and 8% of ADRP, respectively. The other genes are associated with smaller fractions of disease.35Overall, mutations in these known disease-causing genes can be detected in nearly half of all ADRP cases, which suggests that many more ADRP genes remain to be identified.
There is considerable overlap between the inheritance patterns and the specific types of retinal dystrophies that are associated with mutations in a particular gene. For example, mutations in RHO,NRL, and RP1were initially associated with dominantly inherited RP,14,23-26,28-31while different sets of mutations in these same genes were later shown to cause autosomal recessive RP.36-38Similarly, some of the same genes that cause ADRP (CRX, IMPDH1, RDS, RHO, and SEMA4A) have also been associated with a number of other retinal phenotypes, including pattern dystrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis, cone dystrophy, and congenital stationary night blindness.39-42Consequently, genes known to cause one retinal dystrophy are excellent candidates for causing others.
In this study, we report the genetic analysis of a 6-generation family from North Carolina with ADRP. The gene that causes ADRP in this family was mapped to chromosome 14q with linkage studies and recombination analysis. Family members were tested for disease-causing mutations in candidate genes contained within this new ADRP locus. A novel mutation in the retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) gene was detected that cosegregates with ADRP in this large pedigree. Mutations in RDH12have been previously associated with recessively inherited retinal dystrophies described clinically as early-onset retinal degeneration or Leber congenital amaurosis.43-45However, this study presents the first case, to our knowledge, of ADRP associated with mutations in RDH12.
The research study was approved by the internal review board of the University of Iowa and informed consent was obtained from study participants.
Thirty-five family members had complete eye examinations and 19 were judged to have ADRP. Visual fields were assessed with Goldmann perimetry and ISCEV standard electroretinograms were obtained from a subset of family members. Patients were judged to be affected if they had classic signs of RP, including bone spiculelike pigmentation of the retina, attenuation of retinal arterioles, waxy pallor of the optic nerve, characteristic ring scotomas, and attenuated electroretinograms.
Cohort of Patients With Photoreceptor Degeneration and Controls
All patients (n = 273) and healthy control subjects (n = 158) were ascertained from the same outpatient ophthalmology clinic population at the University of Iowa. Subjects underwent complete eye examinations and were judged to be affected if they exhibited signs of a primary photoreceptor degeneration, including bone spiculelike pigmentation of the retina, reduced ISCEV standard electroretinogram amplitudes, and characteristic visual field defects. Control subjects had no clinical signs or family history of a retinal degeneration. Blood samples were obtained from study participants and DNA was prepared using a nonorganic method.46
Pedigree members were first genotyped with short tandem repeat polymorphism (STRP) genetic markers flanking previously identified ADRP genes including rhodopsin (OMIM 180380), RDS/peripherin (OMIM 179605), and RP1(OMIM 603937). Genotyping with STRP genetic markers was conducted using standard methods as previously described.47A genome-wide scan was next performed with Affymetrix microarrays (Sty1array of the GeneChip Human Mapping 500K Array Set, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California), which interrogated 238 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Sample processing and labeling were performed using the manufacturer's instructions. The arrays were hybridized, washed, and scanned in the University of Iowa DNA core facility. Array images were processed with GeneChip DNA Analysis software.
Microarray data were analyzed and multipoint nonparametric linkage scores were calculated using the Genespring GT software package (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, California). Pairwise linkage analysis using STRP markers was performed with the MLINK and LODSCORE programs as implemented in the FASTLINK (v2.3) version48,49of the LINKAGE software package.50Penetrance and disease gene frequency were set to 99% and 0.1%, respectively. For each STRP marker, the allele frequencies were assumed to be equal. True allele frequencies could not be reliably estimated from the small number of spouses in the pedigree. To show that the assumption of the equal allele frequencies would not significantly affect our linkage results, we recalculated the LOD scores using allele frequencies for the “affected” allele of the most tightly linked marker (D14S587) ranging from 0.01 to 0.5. The Zmax for D14S587 was 4.5 when the affected allele frequency was arbitrarily set to 50%. In the 10 spouses who were studied, the actual frequencies of the affected alleles of D14S587 were much lower than 50%. In this small sample, the frequency of the affected allele of D14S587 was 10%, which provides additional evidence that our use of equal allele frequencies for D14S587 (11%) was reasonable.
Candidate genes were selected from among the genes in the chromosome 14q–linked interval based on their function, expression pattern, and prior association with retinal disease. DNA samples from 2 affected family members and from 2 healthy control subjects were tested for mutations in candidate genes using bidirectional sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products that encompassed the entire coding sequence. The first, and only, candidate to be evaluated was retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12, OMIM 608830). Sequencing was performed using dye-terminator chemistry on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed with a standard protocol51using primer sequences that are available on request. Potential mutations were identified by comparing the DNA sequence of the affected family members and healthy control subjects. Similarly, the DNA sequences of the affected family members were compared with National Center for Biotechnology Information reference sequences (RDH12, NM_152443). Identified sequence variations were evaluated as potential disease-causing mutations using standard criteria.52A single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) assay was developed to detect the 776delG mutation in the control population (n = 158) with a standard protocol51using primer sequences that are available on request. The cohort of 273 patients with primary photoreceptor degenerations and 90 of the 158 healthy control subjects were tested for mutations in the entire RDH12gene using a combination of SSCP analysis and bidirectional sequencing using standard protocols.51
The frequency of RDH12variations detected in our cohort of patients with photoreceptor degeneration and our cohort of healthy control subjects was compared using the Fisher exact test for rare variants and χ2analysis for common variations. A 2-tailed Pvalue <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Members of a 6-generation family (pedigree 041D) received complete eye examinations and 19 family members were found to be clinically affected with RP. The disease in this family demonstrated an autosomal dominant mode of transmission through several generations (Figure 1). Family members had retinal findings typical of RP, including intraretinal bone spiculelike pigmentation and attenuation of retinal arterioles (Figure 2). Clinical information about the onset of disease was available from 4 of the affected family members. The average age at diagnosis in these family members was 28.5 years (range, 12-43 years). Some affected family members have maintained excellent central visual acuity (ie, 20/25 OU) and driving privileges into their eighth decade of life.
DNA samples from the family, including 19 affected members, were subsequently studied with linkage analysis using a stepwise approach. After linkage to several loci containing genes already associated with ADRP was excluded (data not shown), a genome-wide scan for linkage was conducted by genotyping DNA samples from 8 of the affected family members with microarrays of SNPs. Analysis of the SNP data identified a region of chromosome 14q with a maximum nonparametric multipoint linkage score of 19.97. All 8 affected pedigree members were found to share an allele of each of the 1350 consecutive SNPs that span 15.2 mega base pairs (Mbp) between rs4901408 and rs4902610.
The chromosome 14q linkage was confirmed by genotyping all 19 affected pedigree members with 26 STRP markers in this region (Figure 3). Two-point parametric LOD scores higher than 3.0 were obtained from 20 STRP markers and a maximum LOD score of 6.81 (θ = 0) was obtained with marker D14S587. The analysis of patients with recombination events near the linked interval is also shown in Figure 3. These recombination events indicate that the disease-causing gene lies within the 21.7-centimorgan (18.6-Mbp) interval between markers D14S1018 (telomeric) and D14S251(telomeric). This chromosome 14q locus contains 173 known genes.
One of the top candidate genes in the chromosome 14q locus is retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12). RDH12is predominantly expressed in the photoreceptor cells of the retina53and has an important role in the visual cycle.44,45Mutations in this gene have been previously associated with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies including Leber congenital amaurosis43and early-onset retinal dystrophy,44,45which share some clinical features of RP. Consequently, RDH12was the first candidate gene to be evaluated.
Two family members with RP were tested for disease-causing mutations in the coding sequence of RDH12using a DNA sequencing-based assay. A total of 3 DNA sequence variations were detected. Two variations are located within intervening sequences and are benign polymorphisms, while one variation causes a change in the predicted protein sequence encoded by RDH12. A heterozygous deletion was detected at position 2 of codon 259 (776delG), which causes a frameshift mutation and a premature termination at codon 277. The 776delG mutation was subsequently detected in all affected family members and was absent from 158 control subjects.
The conservation of the RDH12 protein sequence was examined to provide support for the pathogenicity of the 776delG mutation. Comparison with other homologous genes suggests that amino acids 37 to 240 are responsible for the dehydrogenase activity of RDH12.54The 776delG mutation does not directly alter the dehydrogenase functional domain; however, it alters or eliminates the terminal 57 amino acids of RDH12, which are highly conserved (Figure 4).
To assess the role of RDH12in the pathogenesis of RP, we screened a panel of 273 patients with primary photoreceptor degenerations and 90 ethnically matched controls for disease-causing mutations using a combination of SSCP analysis and DNA sequencing. Patients were unselected for family history or for inheritance pattern of disease; however, patients with a diagnosis of Leber congenital amaurosis were excluded from this cohort. A total of 7 different RDH12variations were detected. Two variations were detected within intervening sequences, 1 variation was a synonymous codon change, and 4 variations were nonsynonymous codon changes (Table).
Multiple analyses were used to assess whether the 4 nonsynonymous coding sequence variations detected in RDH12were likely to be pathogenic. Analysis of coinheritance with disease was possible for the Glu260Asp variation. The patient harboring the Glu260Asp variation had affected family members available for study. However, the Glu260Asp variation was not coinherited with disease in this family (data not shown), suggesting that this variation is a benign polymorphism. Analysis of conservation of protein sequence was conducted using the blosum62 matrix.52,55Some amino acid substitutions are tolerated without harm to protein function better than others. The blosum62 matrix was used to estimate the effects of the 4 nonsynonymous variations on the function of RDH12.Three of the 4 variations (Leu144Val, Arg161Gln, and Glu260Asp) cause changes in the amino acid sequence predicted by RDH12that are well tolerated by evolution, which is not indicative of disease-causing mutations. One variation (Ala126Glu) causes an amino acid substitution that is mildly supported by the blosum62 matrix as a disease-causing mutation. Finally, statistical analysis of these variations either individually or as a group failed to detect an association between the variations and disease (Table). One commonly detected variation (Arg161Gln) was observed at the same frequency in patients and controls (Pvalue = .91). This variation was similarly reported as a benign polymorphism in prior studies of RDH12.56The other 3 nonsynonymous variations (Leu144Val, Ala126Glu, and Glu260Asp) were each detected only once in the cohort of patients and were not statistically associated with disease (Pvalue = >.99).
Fourteen genes associated with ADRP have been discovered, and in this article, we report the identification of another disease-causing gene using positional cloning and candidate gene screening techniques. Linkage studies of a large multiplex pedigree revealed a novel ADRP locus on chromosome 14q, which contains 173 known genes, including RDH12.
RDH12was considered the top candidate gene for causing ADRP in the chromosome 14q locus because of its function, expression pattern, and prior association with other retinal dystrophies. RDH12is predominantly expressed in the neurosensory retina57and has an essential role in the conversion of all-transretinal to all-transretinol,44which is an essential step in the visual cycle. Autosomal recessive mutations in RDH12have been associated with profound photoreceptor dysfunction and reduced visual function that is diagnosed at birth or in the first decade of life.43,44Consequently, RDH12was the first gene we evaluated as the cause of RP in our pedigree.
Testing the family members for RDH12variations revealed a frameshift mutation (776delG) that causes premature termination of the translation of the RDH12transcript. Several lines of evidence suggest that this mutation causes ADRP in our family. First, the 776delG mutation cosegregates with disease in the family. Second, this mutation was not detected among 158 control subjects. Third, the 776delG mutation causes a truncation of the encoded RDH12 protein eliminating 57 amino acids from the conserved carboxy terminus. This mutation significantly alters the structure of the RDH12 protein and is likely to impair its function. Finally, mutations in RDH12have been previously associated with retinal degenerations. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the 776delG mutation in RDH12causes ADRP in our pedigree. Functional studies of the 776delG mutation would be helpful to further establish its mechanism of action.
We additionally tested a large cohort of patients with primary retinal degenerations for disease-causing mutations in RDH12. No additional instances of the del776C mutation were detected; however, 3 other RDH12variations (Leu144Val, Ala126Glu, and Glu260Asp) were each detected once in our cohort of patients. These variations were analyzed for coinheritance with disease, alteration of conserved RDH12 protein sequence, and statistical evidence to support an association with disease. While it is possible that any of these 3 RDH12variations are rare causes of retinal degeneration, our study was unable to provide evidence for their pathogenicity.
The biologic events that lead to visual perception begin when light is absorbed by photoreceptors in the retina and triggers the isomerization of 11-cisretinal to all-transretinal. This reaction initiates transmission of visual information as a chemical signal. For continued signal transduction, all-transretinal must be recycled to 11-cisretinal (the visual cycle). RDH12plays an important role in this cycle by catalyzing the conversion of all-transretinal to all-transretinol. Both missense and truncating mutations in RDH12have been associated with early-onset autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies. Functional assays have shown that some of these RDH12mutations significantly reduce the enzymatic activity of the encoded protein,44,56which implies that autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies and severe visual impairment are caused by loss of function mutations in RDH12. The 776delG mutation identified in our ADRP family is likely to cause disease via a mechanism that is different than that previously reported for RDH12mutations. This heterozygous mutation likely causes milder disease via a gain of function or dominant negative mechanism rather than loss of function. Some RDH12mutations cause severe and early-onset retinal dystrophy when 2 alleles are inherited, while a single 776delG allele is capable of causing a mild, late-onset form of disease. Truncating mutations, similar to 776delG, have been detected in each of RDH12's 7 exons. However, only the 776delG mutation has been associated with RP in the heterozygous state. Thus, the different behavior of these mutations does not appear to be due to their gross position within the RDH12gene. Further study of the mechanism by which the 776delG mutation causes disease may clarify the basis of RDH12genotype-phenotype correlations as well as provide valuable insight into the biology of the visual cycle and vision.
Correspondence:Edwin M. Stone, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242 (edwin-stone@uiowa.edu).
Submitted for Publication:August 13, 2007; final revision received January 24, 2008; accepted January 29, 2008.
Financial Disclosure:None reported.
Funding/Support:This work was supported by the Foundation Fighting Blindness, Research to Prevent Blindness, and the Grousbeck Family Foundation. Dr Fingert is supported by a Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award.
2.Bok
D Contributions of genetics to our understanding of inherited monogenic retinal diseases and age-related macular degeneration.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125
(2)
160- 164
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Daiger
SPBowne
SJSullivan
LS Perspective on genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125
(2)
151- 158
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Bardien
SEbenezer
NGreenberg
J
et al. An eighth locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa is linked to chromosome 17q.
Hum Mol Genet 1995;4
(8)
1459- 1462
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Rebello
GRamesar
RVorster
A
et al. Apoptosis-inducing signal sequence mutation in carbonic anhydrase IV identified in patients with the RP17 form of retinitis pigmentosa.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101
(17)
6617- 6622
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Evans
KFryer
AInglehearn
C
et al. Genetic linkage of cone-rod retinal dystrophy to chromosome 19q and evidence for segregation distortion.
Nat Genet 1994;6
(2)
210- 213
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Freund
CLGregory-Evans
CYFurukawa
T
et al. Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor.
Cell 1997;91
(4)
543- 553
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Wada
YAbe
TTakeshita
TSato
HYanashima
KTamai
M Mutation of human retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) causes autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42
(10)
2395- 2400
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Payne
AMDownes
SMBessant
DA
et al. Genetic analysis of the guanylate cyclase activator 1B (GUCA1B) gene in patients with autosomal dominant retinal dystrophies.
J Med Genet 1999;36
(9)
691- 693
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Jordan
SAFarrar
GJKenna
P
et al. Localization of an autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa gene to chromosome 7q.
Nat Genet 1993;4
(1)
54- 58
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Bowne
SJSullivan
LSBlanton
SH
et al. Mutations in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IMPDH1) cause the RP10 form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Hum Mol Genet 2002;11
(5)
559- 568
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Kennan
AAherne
APalfi
A
et al. Identification of an IMPDH1 mutation in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP10) revealed following comparative microarray analysis of transcripts derived from retinas of wild-type and Rho (−/−) mice.
Hum Mol Genet 2002;11
(5)
547- 557
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Coppieters
FLeroy
BPBeysen
D
et al. Recurrent mutation in the first zinc finger of the orphan nuclear receptor NR2E3 causes autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Am J Hum Genet 2007;81
(1)
147- 157
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Bessant
DAPayne
AMMitton
KP
et al. A mutation in NRL is associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet 1999;21
(4)
355- 356
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Xu
SYSchwartz
MRosenberg
TGal
A A ninth locus (RP18) for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa maps in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 1.
Hum Mol Genet 1996;5
(8)
1193- 1197
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Chakarova
CFHims
MMBolz
H
et al. Mutations in HPRP3, a third member of pre-mRNA splicing factor genes, implicated in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Hum Mol Genet 2002;11
(1)
87- 92
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Greenberg
JGoliath
RBeighton
PRamesar
R A new locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa on the short arm of chromosome 17.
Hum Mol Genet 1994;3
(6)
915- 918
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.McKie
ABMcHale
JCKeen
TJ
et al. Mutations in the pre-mRNA splicing factor gene PRPC8 in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP13).
Hum Mol Genet 2001;10
(15)
1555- 1562
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.al-Maghtheh
MInglehearn
CFKeen
TJ
et al. Identification of a sixth locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa on chromosome 19.
Hum Mol Genet 1994;3
(2)
351- 354
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.Vithana
ENAbu-Safieh
LAllen
MJ
et al. A human homolog of yeast pre-mRNA splicing gene, PRP31, underlies autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa on chromosome 19q13.4 (RP11).
Mol Cell 2001;8
(2)
375- 381
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Farrar
GJKenna
PJordan
SA
et al. A three-base-pair deletion in the peripherin-RDS gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa.
Nature 1991;354
(6353)
478- 480
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Kajiwara
KHahn
LBMukai
STravis
GHBerson
ELDryja
TP Mutations in the human retinal degeneration slow gene in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Nature 1991;354
(6353)
480- 483
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.McWilliam
PFarrar
GJKenna
P
et al. Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP): localization of an ADRP gene to the long arm of chromosome 3.
Genomics 1989;5
(3)
619- 622
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Dryja
TPMcGee
TLHahn
LB
et al. Mutations within the rhodopsin gene in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
N Engl J Med 1990;323
(19)
1302- 1307
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Dryja
TPMcGee
TLHahn
LBCowley
GSYandell
DWSandberg
MA A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa.
Nature 1990;343
(6256)
364- 366
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Farrar
GJMcWilliam
PBradley
DG
et al. Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: linkage to rhodopsin and evidence for genetic heterogeneity.
Genomics 1990;8
(1)
35- 40
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Dryja
TPHahn
LBKajiwara
KBerson
EL Dominant and digenic mutations in the peripherin/rds and rom1 genes in the retinitis pigmentosa.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38
(10)
1972- 1982
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Blanton
SHHeckenlively
JRCottingham
AW
et al. Linkage mapping of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP1) to the pericentric region of human chromosome 8.
Genomics 1991;11
(4)
857- 869
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.Pierce
EAQuinn
TMeehan
TMcGee
TLBerson
ELDryja
TP Mutations in a gene encoding a new oxygen-regulated photoreceptor protein cause dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet 1999;22
(3)
248- 254
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Bowne
SJDaiger
SPHims
MM
et al. Mutations in the RP1 gene causing autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Hum Mol Genet 1999;8
(11)
2121- 2128
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 31.Sullivan
LSHeckenlively
JRBowne
SJ
et al. Mutations in a novel retina-specific gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet 1999;22
(3)
255- 259
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 32.Inglehearn
CFCarter
SAKeen
TJ
et al. A new locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa on chromosome 7p.
Nat Genet 1993;4
(1)
51- 53
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 33.Keen
TJHims
MMMcKie
AB
et al. Mutations in a protein target of the Pim-1 kinase associated with the RP9 form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.
Eur J Hum Genet 2002;10
(4)
245- 249
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Abid
AIsmail
MMehdi
SQKhaliq
S Identification of novel mutations in the SEMA4A gene associated with retinal degenerative diseases.
J Med Genet 2006;43
(4)
378- 381
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Sullivan
LSBowne
SJBirch
DG
et al. Prevalence of disease-causing mutations in families with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: a screen of known genes in 200 families.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47
(7)
3052- 3064
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 36.Rosenfeld
PJCowley
GSMcGee
TLSandberg
MABerson
ELDryja
TP A null mutation in the rhodopsin gene causes rod photoreceptor dysfunction and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet 1992;1
(3)
209- 213
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 37.Nishiguchi
KMFriedman
JSSandberg
MASwaroop
ABerson
ELDryja
TP Recessive NRL mutations in patients with clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration and relative preservation of blue cone function.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101
(51)
17819- 17824
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 38.Khaliq
SAbid
AIsmail
M
et al. Novel association of RP1 gene mutations with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.
J Med Genet 2005;42
(5)
436- 438
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 39.Freund
CLWang
QChen
S
et al. De novo mutations in the CRX homeobox gene associated with Leber congenital amaurosis.
Nat Genet 1998;18
(4)
311- 312
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 40.Bowne
SJSullivan
LSMortimer
SE
et al. Spectrum and frequency of mutations in IMPDH1 associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47
(1)
34- 42
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 41.Nichols
BESheffield
VVandenburgh
KDrack
AKimura
AStone
E Butterfly-shaped pigment dystrophy of the fovea is caused by a point mutation in codon 167 of the RDS gene.
Nat Genet 1993;3
(3)
202- 207
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 42.Itabashi
TWada
YSato
HKawamura
MShiono
TTamai
M Novel 615delC mutation in the CRX gene in a Japanese family with cone-rod dystrophy.
Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138
(5)
876- 877
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 43.Perrault
IHanein
SGerber
S
et al. Retinal dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis.
Am J Hum Genet 2004;75
(4)
639- 646
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 44.Janecke
ARThompson
DAUtermann
G
et al. Mutations in RDH12 encoding a photoreceptor cell retinol dehydrogenase cause childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy.
Nat Genet 2004;36
(8)
850- 854
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 45.Thompson
DAJanecke
ARLange
J
et al. Retinal degeneration associated with RDH12 mutations results from decreased 11-cis retinal synthesis due to disruption of the visual cycle.
Hum Mol Genet 2005;14
(24)
3865- 3875
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 46.Buffone
GJDarlinton
GJ Isolation of DNA from biological specimens without extraction with phenol.
Clin Chem 1985;31
(1)
164- 165
PubMedGoogle Scholar 47.Héon
EPiguet
BMunier
F
et al. Linkage of autosomal dominant radial drusen (Malattia Leventinese) to chromosome 2p16-21.
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114
(2)
193- 198
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 48.Cottingham
RW
JrIdury
RMSchaffer
AA Faster sequential genetic linkage computations.
Am J Hum Genet 1993;53
(1)
252- 263
PubMedGoogle Scholar 50.Lathrop
GMLalouel
JM Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers.
Am J Hum Genet 1984;36
(2)
460- 465
PubMedGoogle Scholar 51.Fingert
JHHeon
ELiebmann
JM
et al. Analysis of myocilin mutations in 1703 glaucoma patients from five different populations.
Hum Mol Genet 1999;8
(5)
899- 905
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 52.Stone
EM Finding and interpreting genetic variations that are important to ophthalmologists.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003;101437- 484
PubMedGoogle Scholar 53.Belyaeva
OVKorkina
OVStetsenko
AVKim
TNelson
PSKedishvili
NY Biochemical properties of purified human retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12): catalytic efficiency toward retinoids and C9 aldehydes and effects of cellular retinol-binding protein type I (CRBPI) and cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) on the oxidation and reduction of retinoids.
Biochemistry 2005;44
(18)
7035- 7047
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 54.Marchler-Bauer
AAnderson
JBDerbyshire
MK
et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis.
Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35
((database issue))
D237- D240
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 56.Sun
WGerth
CMaeda
A
et al. Novel RDH12 mutations associated with Leber congenital amaurosis and cone-rod dystrophy: biochemical and clinical evaluations.
Vision Res 2007;47
(15)
2055- 2066
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 57.Haeseleer
FJang
GFImanishi
Y
et al. Dual-substrate specificity short chain retinol dehydrogenases from the vertebrate retina.
J Biol Chem 2002;277
(47)
45537- 45546
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref