Objective
To analyze the frequency of major age-related macular degeneration (AMD)-associated alleles in patients with multifocal choroiditis (MFC).
Methods
A cohort of 48 patients with MFC was compared with previously characterized cohorts of patients with advanced AMD (368 samples) and matched unaffected controls (368 samples). Allele and genotype frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms for the following AMD-associated alleles were evaluated: risk alleles in complement factor H (CFH) gene (Y402H and IVS14) and LOC387715/HTRA1gene on 10q26 (A69S) and protective alleles in CFH(IVS1, IVS6, and delCFHR1-3) and complement factor B loci (H9L and R32Q).
Results
Frequencies of all major AMD-associated alleles in the CFHlocus indicate a strong, statistically significant association of CFHgene single nucleotide polymorphisms and MFC. However, the same analysis for the single nucleotide polymorphisms in complement factor B and 10q26 loci matched the results in the control group.
Conclusions
Like AMD, the MFC phenotype is strongly associated with the major alleles/haplotypes in the CFHlocus.
Clinical Relevance
We report compelling evidence of a strong association between CFHpolymorphisms and MFC, which contributes to the understanding of MFC pathogenesis and suggests new potential therapeutic targets.
Multifocal choroiditis (MFC) typically affects individuals younger than 50 years and leads to a dramatic decrease in their quality of life and productive capacity. It is typically seen as a chronic relapsing panuveitis with multiple chorioretinal lesions. Acute yellow-white lesions primarily involve the choroid and outer retina and may evolve to punched-out chorioretinal scars with pigmented borders.1-4Although 85% of cases are bilateral, the severity of the disease is commonly asymmetric.3,4Secondary vision loss occurs in up to 70% of cases, mainly as a result of complications in the macular area such as cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane, and choroidal neovascularization (CNV).3,5,6Reported frequencies of secondary CNV are variable in different series, but it is a major complication of MFC. Choroidal neovascularization may occur early in the course of the disease and is a main cause of visual acuity loss in patients with MFC.3,5,7,8An autoimmune inflammatory reaction is the proposed pathogenesis for MFC and concurrent panuveitis.9Histologic studies have suggested that subfoveal neovascularization secondary to both inflammatory and degenerative causes is associated with a local inflammatory response that varies with the underlying disease and the maturity of the neovascular membrane.10Early and aggressive immunosuppressive drug therapy reduces the risk of developing posterior pole complications and severe visual impairment.3,8
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness and visual loss in the elderly in developed countries. It is a multifactorial disease with several established risk factors, including genetic and environmental components.11-15Genetic predisposing factors,16-21cellular oxidative stress,22,23complement system pathways,24,25and local inflammatory processes26,27play a role in AMD pathogenesis.
Determination of contributing genetic factors in MFC might aid specific molecular diagnosis, suggest disease prognosis, and disclose novel potential targets for interventional strategies. Multifocal choroiditis and AMD seem to share fundamental pathophysiologic characteristics because immunologic mechanisms and chorioretinal inflammation play a central role in both conditions.8-10,25-27Although there is compelling evidence that polygenic risk factors and immune-mediated processes play a fundamental role in AMD pathogenesis,24-27disease-associated genotypes, to our knowledge, have never been described for MFC. Herein, we investigated the recently identified major risk and protective AMD-associated haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNPs) in our cohort of patients with MFC.
Institutional review board approval was obtained for the study, and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. The MFC cohort consisted of 48 consecutive patients referred to a tertiary ophthalmologic center (Vitreous-Retina-Macula Consultants) during a 1-year period (from June 1, 2006, to May 31, 2007) enrolled after providing informed consent. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Most of the subjects (44) were whites of European-American descent, 2 were of Asian origin, and 2 were of Hispanic origin. The cohort included 46 unrelated patients and 2 siblings with a 3:1 female to male ratio (34 [71%] were female). The mean age at the time of enrollment in the study was 45 years, which does not coincide with the original time of MFC diagnosis, since most of the patients had been previously assessed by general ophthalmologists. At the time of enrollment, 77% of the cases (37 patients) showed secondary CNV of the so-called predominantly classic type.
Patients underwent complete clinical ophthalmic examination, including visual acuity measurement, biomicroscopy, ocular tonometry, and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Color fundus retinography was performed in all patients. Other complementary imaging tests (fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging) were performed when indicated. Diagnosis of MFC was clinically confirmed on the basis of the presence of chorioretinal lesions (acute choroidal lesion or pigmented chorioretinal scar) associated with clinical signs of uveitis (inflammatory cells in anterior and/or posterior chambers, vasculitis, optic nerve head hyperemia and edema), as previously established.1-3None of the patients had any concurrent ocular or systemic diagnosis associated with host/cell tissue damage mechanism (uveitis of any other cause, AMD, and ocular or systemic autoimmune disease).
The cohort of patients with advanced AMD was composed of 368 subjects with end-stage disease; three-fourths had CNV and one-fourth had geographic atrophy. The control cohort included 368 disease-free individuals (no AMD or MFC) matched by age and ethnicity with the AMD cohort. The average (SD) age for each population was 71.3 (−8.9) years and 68.8 (−8.6) years, respectively. Both groups were the same as reported in previous studies, where the ascertainment procedures and clinical characterization are described in detail.19,28Genomic DNA was generated from peripheral blood leukocytes collected from study subjects by means of kits (QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi; Qiagen, Valencia, California).
The htSNPs for complement factor H (CFH) (OMIM 134370) and complement factor B (CFB) (OMIM 138470) genes were defined in previous studies.19,28,29The LOC387715/HTRA1gene high-risk AMD-associated A69S variant was described in previous studies.20,30The genotyped htSNPs included the following: in the CFHlocus, (1) rs1061170 (Y402H), (2) rs1410996 (IVS14T>C), (3) rs529825 (IVS1C>T), and (4) rs3766404 (IVS6C>T); in the CFBlocus, (1) rs4151667 (H9L), (2) rs641153 (R32Q); and in the LOC387715/HTRA1gene, rs10490924 (A69S).
Genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism and/or by TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). The technique used was identical to that previously described.19Briefly, 5 ng of DNA was subjected to 50 cycles on a 384-well thermocycler (ABI 9700, Applied Biosystems), and plates were read in a sequence detection system (7900 HT, Applied Biosystems). Further genotyping details are available on request. Statistical analyses were performed by standard 2 × 2 table and Fisher exact tests. Multiple-comparisons tests (eg, Bonferroni correction) were not applied because each htSNP was analyzed independently. However, because 1 to 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed in each gene (Table), the application of Bonferroni correction would still result in statistical significance in all cases.
Allele and genotype frequency of 8 htSNPs from 3 loci, all tagging major AMD-associated haplotypes, were characterized in a cohort of 48 patients with MFC and compared with the same data acquired previously on a cohort of 368 subjects with end-stage AMD and an AMD-matched control cohort of 368 individuals.19,28Four htSNPs and 1 deletion were analyzed in the CFHlocus. The most analyzed htSNP in CFH, which tags the major high-risk haplotype in AMD (H1), is Y402H (rs1061170).19As in AMD, the Y402H allele was highly elevated in the MFC cohort (Table); the risk of (402H) allele frequency in the MFC cohort (55.3%) was even slightly higher than that in the AMD cohort (53.9%), whereas it was much lower (32.4%) in the control cohort (P < .001; χ2 = 17.54; odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.8). The same was true for the IVS14T>C (rs1410996) SNP, which is more frequent than Y402H and tags an additional high-risk allele in AMD. Again, the frequency of this allele was practically identical in the MFC and AMD groups (72.3% vs 71.5%), which is significantly higher than in the control group (52.8%; P < .001; χ2 = 11.2; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.34-3.3).19,28
The same trend continued with the “protective” CFHhtSNPs, IVS1C>T (rs529825) and IVS6C>T (rs3766404), which tag H2 and H4, respectively, the 2 previously identified major AMD-protective haplotypes in the CFHlocus.19Again, the frequencies of the H2-tagging IVS1 T allele were practically identical between the MFC cohort (15.6%) and the AMD cohort (16.1%), which were both much lower than in the control cohort (26.1%). This difference was even more apparent with the H4-tagging SNP IVS6 T. The frequency of the minor allele was 17.8% in the control cohort, 8.3% in the AMD cohort, and only 3.1% in the MFC cohort, a highly significant difference (P < .001; χ2 = 13.8; OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.50). For comparison, the OR for the same difference in SNP frequency between AMD and controls was 0.48.19This observation was further confirmed by genotyping of the highly AMD-protective deletion in the CFHlocus (delCFHR1-3), which lies on the H4 haplotype in 75% of cases.19,28No patient with MFC carried the homozygous deletion, which has been reported in approximately 6% of the white population and in approximately 1% of patients with AMD.29
Next, we analyzed the 2 major protective haplotypes from the CFB/complement component 2 (C2) locus (OMIM 217000), tagged by missense variants R32Q (rs641153) and H9L (rs4151667). Although relatively rare, each of these alleles has been shown to be 2 to 3 times more frequent in healthy elderly individuals than in patients with AMD.28The frequency of these htSNPs in the MFC cohort, however, was more similar to that of the control group than the AMD cohort. Specifically, the frequency of the protective 32Q allele was 8.3% in the MFC cohort (Table), 10.4% in the control cohort (difference not statistically significant), and 3.3% in the AMD cohort (a significant difference with both the controls and MFC). The difference between AMD and MFC was even more pronounced for the second allele (9L), which was detected in 1.7% of patients with AMD, 4.4% of controls, and 5.2% of patients with MFC (P = .02; OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88). For this locus, the patients with MFC had as many or more AMD-protective alleles as did normal controls.
Finally, because CNV is a common complication in both end-stage AMD and MFC, we also determined the frequency of another major risk allele for AMD, the A69S variant in the LOC387715/HTRA1gene (LOC387714: OMIM 611313; HTRA1: OMIM 602194) on 10q26, which had been specifically associated with end-stage AMD (CNV and geographic atrophy) but not with early-stage AMD.20Like the CFBlocus, the frequency of the AMD-associated 69S variant in the MFC cohort (29.3%) was much closer to that in the control cohort (22.3%) than in the AMD cohort (48.4%; P < .001; OR, 0.41).
The genetic results are summarized in the Table. Although our sample size had insufficient power to compare different subphenotypes among our patients with MFC, we did not observe a trend for a statistically significant difference in genotypes of patients with or without secondary CNV.
An inflammatory mechanism is the proposed pathogenesis for MFC, in which a nongranulomatous choroiditis with a predominantly B-cell infiltrate is the principal histopathological finding. Acutely, the foci may show chorioretinal inflammation with consequential destruction of Bruch membrane, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and outer neurosensory retina.9Our results show that, in patients with MFC, the frequencies of CFHalleles are similar (almost identical) to those previously described for patients with AMD, which are strongly associated with an initial inflammatory component.25,27Therefore, our results identify a genotype that may lead to a host cell/tissue damage mechanism eventually manifested in the clinical findings characteristic of this entity and suggest that some disease mechanisms in MFC and AMD are similar, if not identical.
Age-related macular degeneration has been described as a complex disorder, derived from the interaction between multiple susceptibility gene loci modulated by environmental risk factors.11,13,14,31-33The anatomic and functional damage in AMD are secondary to degenerative and neovascular changes that affect the neurosensory retina and underlying choroid. Drusen deposition at the level of RPE is the hallmark lesion of early disease; local inflammation and activation of the complement cascade have been implicated in their formation.19,22-27Complement system components such as complement pathway inhibitors, complement pathway activators, activation-specific complement fragments, and terminal pathway components, including the membrane attack complex, have been identified within drusenoid material, RPE cells, retinal basal membrane, and choriocapillaris in AMD.25,34,35
The major soluble inhibitor of the alternative complement pathway, CFH, is synthesized by RPE and has been implicated in inflammatory and oxidative damage of retinal cells.19,27Most of the AMD-associated polymorphisms in the CFHlocus occur in functional domains of the encoded protein, including binding sites for C-reactive protein, heparin, C3b, and sialic acid.19The SNPs are likely to affect the function of the CFH protein through interaction with other proteins in the pathway. Different AMD-associated CFHgene SNPs and haplotypes that influence the disease severity and age at onset have been described.19,29,36
Variants in CFH, as well as in other CFH-related proteins, have a role in the etiology of other immune-mediated diseases such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, where some risk haplotypes overlap with those of AMD.37,38The first htSNP we analyzed in the CFHlocus was Y402H, a common coding variant shown to confer elevated risk of soft drusen and of late-stage AMD in most studied populations; it is the major susceptibility marker for all forms of AMD, including bilateral early-onset cases.19,39The 402H allele was highly elevated in our cohort of patients with MFC, with a frequency almost identical to that previously found in AMD cohorts and significantly higher than in the control group. The complement system activity has been associated with CNV proliferation and other processes of inflammatory tissue response and tissue scarring,40although the precise impact of CFHY402H polymorphisms on CNV phenotype is still unclear because variable genotypic/phenotypic correlations have been reported.41Unlike neovascular AMD, where lesion phenotype is highly variable, in MFC the neovascular lesion is virtually always classified as the predominantly classic type, or type II CNV, on the basis of fluorescein angiography of the retina. Interestingly, an association between lesion phenotype and CFHgenotype has been previously demonstrated in AMD. The cohort with the AMD-risk C allele encoding the CFH402H variant appeared to be highly correlated with the predominantly classic type of CNV.42Indeed, in our MFC cohort, 84.1% of patients had at least 1 C allele. At the time of enrollment in the study, 77% of cases (37 patients) had secondary CNV; all of them showed type II CNV.
An additional AMD-risk allele is tagged by the IVS14T>C, which was also found to have practically identical frequencies in MFC and AMD cohorts and significantly higher frequencies than in control patients. Inversely, the analyzed htSNPs IVS1C>T and IVS6C>T tag 2 previously reported major AMD-protective haplotypes.19Our results again showed similar genotype frequencies for both the MFC and AMD cohorts, significantly different from the control group. Actually, the patients in the MFC cohort possessed even fewer protective alleles than those affected with AMD, perhaps reflecting the early and severe choroidal inflammation commonly observed in MFC.3-8
The CFHand CFH-related genes closely reside within a locus on chromosome 1q32 and share extremely high sequence homology. Although the CFH-related proteins are expressed in serum, their function remains to be determined.29Genotyping the highly AMD-protective deletion in the CFHlocus (delCFHR1-3) did not identify homozygous individuals in the MFC cohort, confirming that the frequency of protective CFHalleles in MFC is even lower than in patients with AMD.
Two haplotype-tagging polymorphisms, L9H and R32Q, in CFBhave been associated with a “protective” effect in AMD, ie, they are found at a much higher frequency in disease-free individuals than in patients with AMD.28Complement factor B aids initiation of the alternative complement cascade, whereas C2 activates the classic pathway. Both are located in the same locus and are expressed in neural retina, RPE, and choroid. The CFB protein has been identified in drusen, Bruch membrane, and, less prominently, choroidal stroma.28Surprisingly, the CFBvariants were not found to be protective in our MFC cohort because the frequency of the 2 haplotype-tagging SNPs was similar to that of the control group and statistically significantly different from that of the AMD group. The frequency of L9H was even higher in patients with MFC than in the disease-free control cohort, but, interestingly, they still developed MFC. In other words, CFB/C2alleles protect for AMD but have no protective effect for MFC.
Multifocal choroiditis and AMD share some determinative clinical features. Atrophy of photoreceptors and RPE or CNV is typical of the advanced manifestation in both entities.3,8,10-12The A69S is a common coding variant in a hypothetical LOC387715/HTRA1gene on chromosome 10q26. This SNP tags the second major AMD susceptibility locus and has been particularly associated with advanced AMD, unlike the variants in the CFHand CFB/C2complement loci that are associated with all stages of AMD.19,20,28,30,43-45The frequency of htSNP A69S found in the MFC cohort was much closer to that in the control group than in the AMD cohort. Consequently, although the major risk allele in the 10q26 locus is highly associated with advanced AMD of either neovascular or atrophic forms, it does not seem to play a significant role in the MFC cohort, where CNV is a major phenotype (present in 77% of MFC cases included in this study). Although it would be tempting to speculate on the possible reasons for this difference, the functional consequences of the genetic variation in the 10q locus remain obscure, which prohibits meaningful speculation at this time.
In summary, a primary biological function of the complement system is to mediate immunologic response to infection. Nonetheless, deregulated activation of the complement cascade exposed to different modulating and triggering factors leads to a chronic imbalance of the inflammatory process. The resultant bystander host-cell/tissue damage has been shown to play a prominent feature in immune-mediated diseases.46
The association of variants in a major regulator of the alternative complement cascade, CFH, with MFC establishes a genetic predisposition for an immune-mediated mechanism at the interface of RPE and choriocapillaris. Indeed, MFC is characterized by a chronic recurrent choroiditis with panuveitis. The strong association of CFHpolymorphisms with MFC provides the first evidence that aberrant regulation of the alternative complement pathway contributes also to the etiology of MFC.
Correspondence:Lawrence A. Yannuzzi, MD, Vitreous-Retina Macula Consultants of New York, 460 Park Ave, Fifth Floor, New York, NY 10022 (VRMNY@aol.com).
Submitted for Publication:January 10, 2008; final revision received April 14, 2008; accepted April 24, 2008.
Author Contributions:The authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Financial Disclosure:None reported.
Funding/Support:This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (EY13435 and EY017404) and The Macula Foundation Inc, and by an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc.
Additional Contributions:Linda Buckta, BA, and Tiia Falk, BA, provided assistance with recruitment of patients and technical issues.
2.Dreyer
RFGass
JD Multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis: a syndrome that mimics ocular histoplasmosis.
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102
(12)
1776- 1784
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.MacLaren
RELightman
SL Variable phenotypes in patients diagnosed with idiopathic multifocal choroiditis.
Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34
(3)
233- 238
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Brown
J
JrFolk
JCReddy
CVKimura
AE Visual prognosis of multifocal choroiditis, punctuate inner choroidopathy, and the diffuse subretinal fibrosis syndrome.
Ophthalmology 1996;103
(7)
1100- 1105
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Vianna
RNOzdal
PCFilho
JPVentura
MPSaraiva
VSDeschênes
J Long-term follow-up of patients with multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004;82
(6)
748- 753
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Cantrill
HLFolk
JC Multifocal choroiditis associated with progressive subretinal fibrosis.
Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101
(2)
170- 180
PubMedGoogle Scholar 8.Michel
SSEkong
ABaltatzis
SFoster
CS Multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis: immunomodulatory therapy.
Ophthalmology 2002;109
(2)
378- 383
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Dunlop
AACree
IAHaque
SLuthert
PJLightman
S Multifocal choroiditis: clinicopathologic correlation.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116
(6)
801- 803
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group, A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report No. 8.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119
(10)
1417- 1436
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Friedman
DSO’Colmain
BJMunoz
B
et al. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group, Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122
(4)
564- 572
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Klein
RPeto
TBird
AVannewkirk
MR The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137
(3)
486- 495
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Seddon
JMCote
JPage
WFAggen
SHNeale
MC The US twin study of age-related macular degeneration.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123
(3)
321- 327
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Allikmets
RShroyer
NFSingh
N
et al. Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration.
Science 1997;277
(5333)
1805- 1807
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Klein
RJZeiss
CChew
EY
et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration.
Science 2005;308
(5720)
385- 389
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Haines
JLHauser
MASchmidt
S
et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration.
Science 2005;308
(5720)
419- 421
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Edwards
AORitter
R
IIIAbel
KJManning
APanhuysen
CFarrer
LA Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration.
Science 2005;308
(5720)
421- 424
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Hageman
GSAnderson
DHJohnson
LV
et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102
(20)
7227- 7232
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.Rivera
AFisher
SAFritsche
LG
et al. Hypothetical LOC387715/HTRA1 is a second major susceptibility gene for age-related macular degeneration, contributing independently of complement factor H to disease risk.
Hum Mol Genet 2005;14
(21)
3227- 3236
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Maller
JGeorge
SPurcell
S
et al. Common variation in three genes, including a noncoding variant in CFH, strongly influences risk of age-related macular degeneration.
Nat Genet 2006;38
(9)
1055- 1059
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Hageman
GSLuthert
PJVictor Chong
NHJohnson
LVAnderson
DHMullins
RF An integrated hypothesis that considers drusen as biomarkers of immune-mediated processes at the RPE-Bruch's membrane interface in aging and age-related macular degeneration.
Prog Retin Eye Res 2001;20
(6)
705- 732
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Johnson
PTLewis
GPTalaga
KC
et al. Drusen-associated degeneration in the retina.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44
(10)
4481- 4488
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Mullins
RFAptsiauri
NHageman
GS Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis.
Eye 2001;15
(pt 3)
390- 395
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Johnson
LVLeitner
WPStaples
MKAnderson
DH Complement activation and inflammatory process in drusen formation and age-related macular degeneration.
Exp Eye Res 2001;73
(6)
887- 896
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Anderson
DHMullins
RFHageman
GSJohnson
LV A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye.
Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134
(3)
411- 431
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Moshfeghi
DMBlumenkranz
MS Role of genetic factors and inflammation in age-related macular degeneration.
Retina 2007;27
(3)
269- 275
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 28.Gold
BMerriam
JEZernant
J
et al. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2) genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration.
Nat Genet 2006;38
(4)
458- 462
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.Hageman
GSHancox
LSTaiber
AJ
et al. AMD Clinical Study Group, Extended haplotypes in the complement factor H (CFH) and CFH-related (CFHR) family of genes that protect against age-related macular degeneration: identification, ethnic distribution and evolutionary implications.
Ann Med 2006;38
(8)
592- 604
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Jakobsdottir
JConley
YPWeeks
DEMah
TSFerrell
REGorin
MB Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26.
Am J Hum Genet 2005;77
(3)
389- 407
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 31.Kalayoglu
MVGalvan
CMahdi
OSByrne
GIMansour
S Serological association between
Chlamydia pneumoniaeinfection and age-related macular degeneration.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121
(4)
478- 482
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 32.Miller
DMEspinosa-Heidmann
DGLegra
J
et al. The association of prior cytomegalovirus infection with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138
(3)
323- 328
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 33.Kalayoglu
MVBula
DArroyo
JGragoudas
ESD’Amico
DMiller
JW Identification of
Chlamydia pneumoniaewithin human choroidal neovascular membranes secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243
(11)
1080- 1090
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Russell
SRMullins
RFSchneider
BLHageman
GS Location, substructure, and composition of basal laminar drusen compared with drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129
(2)
205- 214
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Mullins
RFRussell
SRAnderson
DHHageman
GS Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis, elastosis, amyloidosis, and dense deposit disease.
FASEB J 2000;14
(7)
835- 846
PubMedGoogle Scholar 36.Hughes
AEOrr
NEsfandiary
HDiaz-Torres
MGoodship
TChakravarthy
U A common CFH haplotype, with deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3, is associated with lower risk of age-related macular degeneration.
Nat Genet 2006;38
(10)
1173- 1177
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 37.Caprioli
JCastelletti
FBucchioni
S
et al. International Registry of Recurrent and Familial HUS/TTP, Complement factor H mutations and gene polymorphisms in haemolytic uraemic syndrome: the C-257T, the A2089G and the G2881T polymorphisms are strongly associated with the disease.
Hum Mol Genet 2003;12
(24)
3385- 3395
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 38.Neary
JJConlon
PJCroke
D
et al. Linkage of a gene causing familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III to chromosome 1.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13
(8)
2052- 2057
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 39.Tedeschi-Blok
NBuckley
JVarma
RTimothy
JTHinton
DR Population-based study of early age-related macular degeneration: role of the complement factor H Y402H polymorphism in bilateral but not unilateral disease.
Ophthalmology 2007;114
(1)
99- 103
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 40.Bora
PSSohn
JHCruz
JM
et al. Role of complement and complement membrane attack complex in laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
J Immunol 2005;174
(1)
491- 497
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 41.Seitsonen
SJärvelä
IMeri
STommila
PRanta
PImmonen
I Complement factor H Y402H polymorphism and characteristics of exudative age-related macular degeneration lesions.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2008;86
(4)
390- 394
Google ScholarCrossref 42.Brantley
MAEdelstein
SLKing
JMApte
RSKymes
SMShiels
A Clinical phenotypes associated with the complement factor H Y402H variant in age-related macular degeneration.
Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144
(3)
404- 408
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 43.Dewan
ALiu
MHartman
S
et al. HTRA1 promoter polymorphism in wet age-related macular degeneration.
Science 2006;314
(5801)
989- 992
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 44.Yang
ZCamp
NJSun
H
et al. A variant of the HTRA1 gene increases susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration.
Science 2006;314
(5801)
992- 993
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 45.Shuler
RKHauser
MACaldwell
J
et al. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration and its association with LOC387715/HTRA1 and complement factor H polymorphism.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125
(1)
63- 67
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref