Objective
To investigate the molecular genetic background in families with nuclear congenital cataract.
Methods
Family history and clinical data were recorded. Ten candidate genes were screened for causative mutations. Direct sequencing was performed to analyze the cosegregation of the genotype with the disease phenotype. Effects of amino acid changes on the structure and function of protein were predicted by bioinformatics analysis.
Results
Analyses of 20 Chinese families with hereditary nuclear congenital cataract revealed 3 novel mutations. Two of these mutations (V146M and I21N) affected βB2-crystallin (CRYBB2). One mutation (R233H) was detected in βB1-crystallin (CRYBB1). These mutations cosegregated with all affected individuals and were not observed in unaffected family members or the 150 healthy unrelated individuals.
Conclusions
The CRYBB2 gene was shown to be another causative gene associated with congenital cataract and microcornea. Three novel mutations in β-crystallin genes (CRYB) were detected in Chinese families with nuclear autosomal dominant congenital cataracts, which underscores the genetic heterogeneity of this condition.
Clinical Relevance
Studying the genetics of nuclear cataracts is helpful for better understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms that underlie this phenotype and for better disease management. This study helps expand the genotype of nuclear cataract and microcornea.
Congenital cataract is a leading cause of visual disability in children. Globally, its prevalence is 0.6 to 6.0 in 10 000 live births, causing approximately 10% of childhood blindness worldwide.1 Inherited isolated (nonsyndromic) cataracts represent one-third of cases, and recently many causative genetic mutations have been identified. To date, more than 30 loci and 18 genes on different chromosomes have been associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract (ADCC).2 Of these mutations, approximately half involve crystallins, one-quarter involve connexins, and the remaining one-quarter involve the other genes.3
Phenotypes are described mainly based on the physical appearance and site of occurrence of the opacity. Phenotypic variabilities among and within families have been documented, including nuclear, anterior polar, posterior polar, coralliform, cerulean (blue-dot), pulverulent, cortical, zonular, and sutural cataracts.1 Of the already characterized phenotypes, nuclear congenital cataracts are the most common type of hereditary congenital cataract.4 Despite attempts to categorize hereditary cataracts clinically, correlation of phenotypes with genetic locus and specific mutation is limited. The clinical and genetic heterogeneity of congenital cataracts is well substantiated. Conversely, congenital cataracts with similar or identical clinical phenotypes can result from mutations in completely different genes. Several genes have been associated with nuclear cataract to date (CRYAA, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYBA3, CRYGC, CRYGD, GJA8, and GJA3).3 Therefore, it is appropriate to consider these genes as the top list of functional candidates in hereditary congenital cataracts. In this study, we screened 20 Chinese families with nuclear ADCC for mutations in 8 crystallin and 2 connexin genes.
This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee for medical research at Capital Medical University. Twenty families affected by nuclear ADCC were recruited at the Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital (Capital Medical University). Affected and unaffected individuals underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity and corrected visual acuity in addition to slitlamp and fundus examinations, corneal diameter measurement, ultrasonography, and intraocular pressure measurement using applanation tonometry. There was no evidence of systemic abnormalities associated with congenital cataract in the probands. Control subjects who matched the ethnic background of the probands were also recruited. They were given the same complete ophthalmologic examinations as the study individuals of the families with ADCC cataract and did not have eye diseases except mild myopia and age-related cataracts. Blood samples were obtained from the probands and their available family members after providing informed consent.
Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify all the exons and intron/exon boundaries of the candidate genes: CRYAA (GenBank NM_000394), CRYAB (GenBank NM_001885), CRYBA1 (GenBank NM_005208), CRYBB1 (GenBank NM_001887), CRYBB2 (GenBank NM_000496), CRYGC (GenBank NM_020989), CRYGD (GenBank NM_006891), CRYGS (GenBank NM_017541), GJA3 (GenBank NM_021954), and GJA8 (GenBank NM_005267). Polymerase chain reaction was performed on genomic DNA samples using the primer pairs listed in the Table. Polymerase chain reaction products were sequenced using an automated sequencer (model ABI 3730, Automated Sequencer; PE Biosystems, Foster City, California). Direct sequencing was also performed to analyze the cosegregation of the genotype with the disease phenotype.
Computational methods were used to determine whether a specific amino acid substitution in a protein sequence might lead to altered protein function and possibly contribute to the disease. The possible functional impact of an amino acid change was predicted by using the PolyPhen (Polymorphism Phenotyping) program (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/). The prediction is based on the position-specific independent counts score derived from multiple sequence alignments of observations. PolyPhen scores greater than 2.0 indicate that the polymorphism is probably damaging to protein function, scores of 1.5 to 2.0 are possibly damaging, and scores less than 1.5 are likely benign. The secondary structure of mutant and wild-type amino acid sequences were analyzed using Antheprot 2000 version 6.0 software (IBCP, Lyon, France).
Twenty families with nuclear ADCC were identified. Cataract phenotypes showed some variability among families, but all involved the embryonal or fetal nucleus to a variable extent. Nystagmus was present in some families and absent in others, depending primarily on the degree of visual impairment during the first months of life. Three mutations were observed in 3 families (15%): 2 resided in CRYBB2 and 1 in CRYBB1.
Four members (2 affected and 2 unaffected) participated in the study (Figure 1A). The proband was a 3-year-old boy who had had cataract extraction performed at age 6 months. He was recorded as having nuclear lens opacification and microcornea. The corneal diameter was 9 mm in both eyes, and the axial length was 23.82 mm in the right eye and 23.74 mm in the left eye. The 2 affected individuals had similar poor visual acuity measured using the decimal system of 0.02 to 0.05, and they also had nystagmus and amblyopia. There was no evidence of other ocular or systemic abnormalities.
Mutation analysis revealed a c.436G>A transversion in exon 5 of CRYBB2 that led to the replacement of valine at position 146 by methionine (V146M) (Figure 1B). The mutation cosegregated with the disease in the family (II-1 and III-1) and was not observed in unaffected family members or in control individuals of Chinese descent.
The Val at position 146 of human βB2-crystallin was located in a phylogenetically conserved region by multiple sequence alignment (Figure 1C). The PolyPhen score from PolyPhen analysis was 2.046, which meant that this V146M CRYBB2 was predicted to be “probably damaging.” The secondary structure prediction showed that the mutation V146M led to the replacement of an original β-strand by an α-helix, a significant difference in coding position 146 of the secondary structure of βB2-crystallin protein (Figure 1D).
Eight members (3 affected and 5 unaffected) participated in the study (Figure 2A). The proband was a 2-year-old boy with dense white opacities distributed throughout the embryonic and fetal nuclei (Figure 2B). His mother (II-3) had had cataract extraction performed at age 5 years and was recorded as having nuclear cataract. There was no evidence of other ocular or systemic abnormalities.
The mutation in this family was identified as a c.62T>A transition in CRYBB2 that led to a missense mutation where a highly conserved isoleucine was replaced by asparagine (I21N) (Figure 2C). The mutation cosegregated with the disease in the family and was not observed in unaffected family members or in controls of Chinese descent.
The Ile at position 21 of human βB2-crystallin was located in a phylogenetically conserved region by multiple sequence alignment (Figure 2D). The PolyPhen score from PolyPhen analysis was 1.155, which meant that this I21N CRYBB2 was predicted to be “probably damaging.” The secondary structure prediction showed that the mutation led to the replacement of an original β-strand by an α-helix (Figure 2E).
Eight members (2 affected and 6 unaffected) participated in the study (Figure 3A). The proband was 2 years old and had had cataract surgery performed at age 3 months. Hospital records confirmed that the cataract was present at birth. On clinical examination, affected individual II-1 displayed a nuclear cataract phenotype (Figure 3B). He had nystagmus and a poor visual acuity measured using the decimal system of 0.1. There were no other ocular or systemic abnormalities.
This family was identified as having a single base alteration c.698G>A in exon 6 of CRYBB1, which resulted in a substitution of Arg to His at codon 233 (R233H) (Figure 3C). The mutation cosegregated with the disease in the family (II-1 and III-1) and was not observed in unaffected family members or in controls of Chinese descent.
The Arg at position 233 of human βB1-crystallin was located in a phylogenetically conserved region by multiple sequence alignment (Figure 3D). The R233H mutation caused no evident secondary structural change to the protein by Antheprot 2000 prediction (data not shown). However, The PolyPhen score from PolyPhen analysis was 2.002, which meant that this R233H CRYBB1 was predicted to be “probably damaging.”
In 17 additional families (85%), no mutations in the 8 crystallin and 2 connexin genes were observed. The phenotypes in all affected members were nuclear opacities to a variable extent. Twelve families also revealed other associated ocular disorders, such as nystagmus, strabismus, and microcornea. Because no mutation was cosegregated with these 10 genes, these families need to be further investigated for the causative mutations.
In this study, we identified the causative mutations in 3 families with nuclear ADCC. Among them, 1 family showed a nuclear cataract and microcornea phenotype. These mutations are observed only in affected individuals and not in unaffected family members or the 150 controls. We, therefore, assume that these variations are the disease-causing mutations rather than polymorphisms. To understand how the single amino acid exchange might affect the protein structure and function, several computational methods are undertaken.
β-Crystallins make up approximately 35% of total crystallin protein and are recognized as a member of the β/γ-crystallin superfamily, which contains 4 Greek key motifs encoded by separate exons. The β-crystallin family contains 5 protein chains (3 CRYBB and 4 CRYBA). CRYBB1, BB2, BB3, and BA4 all map to chromosome 22q11.2-13.1 with a similar gene structure. Different β-crystallin proteins are found in prenatal and postnatal developing lens, and their interactions with each other and with other lens proteins are postulated to be critical for lens transparency.5
The CRYBB2 gene consists of 6 exons: the first exon is not translated, the second exon encodes the NH2-terminal extension, and the subsequent 4 exons are responsible for 1 Greek key motif each.6 Two CRYBB2 mutations were identified in the present study. The mutation V146M in family A is located in the highly conserved valine residues in a major functional domain of the βB2-crystallin, the third Greek key motif of the protein and a region crucial to the correct formation of the tertiary structure. The secondary structure prediction shows that the mutation leads to the replacement of an original β-strand by an α-helix, which may affect the Greek key motifs and change the folding properties of βB2-crystallin. Loss of valine would lead to a change in intrapeptide or interpeptide bonding and folding. The phenotype of cataract is presumed to be caused by the formation of a heavy molecular weight fraction6 or a decrease in the stability of βB2-crystallin. The associated microcornea might be due to the inductive effects from the abnormally formed lens on the cornea during embryogenesis or the change in its steric coordinations with other proteins in lens.
The observed p.I21N substitution is located in the first Greek key motif of the βB2-crystallin protein and replaces the highly conserved nonpolar isoleucine with polar asparagine at position 21, in association with the nuclear cataract in the present study. The I21N mutation is predicted to be possibly damaging by PolyPhen analysis, which highlights the functional importance of this region of the protein. The secondary structure of the mutant protein is predicted, and the β-strand is replaced by an α-helix, which may be the reason for the dysfunction of the mutant protein. We, thus, hypothesize that the novel mutation I21N changes the protein structure around the mutant site that could alter the local binding ability, which would disrupt dimerization of the βB2-crystallin protein or impair binding with other lens-soluble proteins. The phenotype observed shows marked nuclear cataract comparable with the mutation in the first Greek key motif of βB2-crystallin, which is linked with coronary cataract. The result highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity of congenital cataracts.7
There are other mutations in CRYBB2 reported to cause a cataract phenotype in families of different ethnic origins (W151C,8 D128V,9 V187M,10 S31W,11 and Q155X12-17). However, all these families, including family B in the present study, are described as having no microcornea. The mutation V146M reported herein is the first CRYBB2 mutation identified in association with cataract and microcornea, which highlights the functional importance of this region of the protein. It is probable that some lens changes affect cornea development and others do not. Further physicochemical experiments are needed to demonstrate the function of CRYBB2.
βB1-crystallin is another major subunit of the β-crystallins and composes 9% of the total soluble crystallins in the human lens.18 A novel mutation R233H of CRYBB1 was identified in the present study. The proband shows a nuclear cataract phenotype with no ocular or systemic abnormalities. The mutation is located in exon 6, which encodes the Greek key IV and the COOH-terminal domain, and the arginine at position 233 is highly conserved among β-crystallin. The PolyPhen analysis considers the mutation to be possibly damaging to the protein. All the findings indicate that Arg233 is an important residue for the function of βB1-crystallin protein. Although major structural changes are not found by Antheprot 2000 analysis, previous functional studies19,20 have shown that the same amino acid change in different genes causes reduced solubility of the protein, which may contribute to cataract formation. The strongly positively charged guanidino group of arginine is replaced by the alkalescent positively charged imidazole functional group of a histidine, which may result in instability of the molecule. Therefore, a strong positively charged residue may be important for the structural and functional integrity of βB1-crystallin, but its effect on the βB1-crystallin structure should be further investigated.
To our knowledge, there are only 4 previous studies of CRYBB1 mutations in patients with ADCC.21-24 All the sequence changes reported in these families are located in exon 6, encoding the Greek key IV and the COOH-terminal extension. All these changes suggest that disruption of the fourth Greek key motif in βB1-crystallin might result in an abnormal COOH-terminus and production of a mutant protein, which underscores the importance of the fourth Greek key motif.
In conclusion, we reported 3 novel mutations in CRYB genes associated with nuclear ADCC in Chinese families, which strongly underscores the importance of the β-crystallins for lens development and contributes to the evaluation of the phenotype-genotype relationship. In addition, the analysis of the remaining 17 families reported herein excludes possible mutations in those genes, suggesting that other genes or loci could be involved with nuclear congenital cataract.
Correspondence: Si Quan Zhu, MD, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Beijing 100730, China (siquanzhu@sina.com).
Submitted for Publication: March 17, 2010; final revision received June 29, 2010; accepted July 2, 2010.
Author Contributions: Drs K. J. Wang and B. B. Wang contributed equally to the article; Drs Ma and Zhu contributed equally to the project and may be considered co-corresponding authors. Dr K. J. Wang had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants 2008BAH24B05 from the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China (Dr Ma), 2009-3-37 from the high-level technical personnel training project of Beijing Municipal health system (Dr Zhu), and 2006DKA21300 from the National Infrastructure Program of Chinese Genetic Resources (Dr Ma).
Additional Contributions: We are grateful to the patients and their families for their enthusiastic participation in this study.
1.Reddy
MAFrancis
PJBerry
VBhattacharya
SSMoore
AT Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes.
Surv Ophthalmol 2004;49
(3)
300- 315
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 2.Wang
KWang
BWang
J
et al. A novel
GJA8 mutation (p.I31T) causing autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family.
Mol Vis 2009;152813- 2820
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Stambolian
DAi
YSidjanin
D
et al. Cloning of the galactokinase cDNA and identification of mutations in two families with cataracts.
Nat Genet 1995;10
(3)
307- 312
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Bax
BLapatto
RNalini
V
et al. X-ray analysis of β B2-crystallin and evolution of oligomeric lens proteins.
Nature 1990;347
(6295)
776- 780
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Graw
JLöster
JSoewarto
D
et al.
Aey2, a new mutation in the βB2-crystallin–encoding gene of the mouse.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42
(7)
1574- 1580
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Hansen
LYao
WEiberg
H
et al. Genetic heterogeneity in microcornea-cataract: five novel mutations in
CRYAA, CRYGD, and
GJA8.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48
(9)
3937- 3944
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Santhiya
STManisastry
SMRawlley
D
et al. Mutation analysis of congenital cataracts in Indian families: identification of SNPS and a new causative allele in
CRYBB2 gene.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45
(10)
3599- 3607
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Pauli
SSöker
TKlopp
NIllig
TEngel
WGraw
J Mutation analysis in a German family identified a new cataract-causing allele in the
CRYBB2 gene.
Mol Vis 2007;13962- 967
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Mothobi
MEGuo
SLiu
YY
et al. Mutation analysis of congenital cataract in a Basotho family identified a new missense allele in
CRYBB2.
Mol Vis 2009;151470- 1475
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Lou
DTong
JPZhang
LYChiang
SWLam
DSPang
CP A novel mutation in
CRYBB2 responsible for inherited coronary cataract.
Eye (Lond) 2009;23
(5)
1213- 1220
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Litt
MCarrero-Valenzuela
RLaMorticella
DM
et al. Autosomal dominant cerulean cataract is associated with a chain termination mutation in the human β-crystallin gene
CRYBB2.
Hum Mol Genet 1997;6
(5)
665- 668
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Gill
DKlose
RMunier
FL
et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the Coppock-like cataract: a mutation in
CRYBB2 on chromosome 22q11.2.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41
(1)
159- 165
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Bateman
JBvon-Bischhoffshaunsen
FRRichter
LFlodman
PBurch
DSpence
MA Gene conversion mutation in crystallin, beta-B2 (
CRYBB2) in a Chilean family with autosomal dominant cataract.
Ophthalmology 2007;114
(3)
425- 432
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Yao
KTang
XShentu
XWang
KRao
HXia
K Progressive polymorphic congenital cataract caused by a
CRYBB2 mutation in a Chinese family.
Mol Vis 2005;11758- 763
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Li
FFZhu
SQWang
SZ
et al. Nonsense mutation in the
CRYBB2 gene causing autosomal dominant progressive polymorphic congenital coronary cataracts.
Mol Vis 2008;14750- 755
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Wang
LLin
HGu
JSu
HHuang
SQi
Y Autosomal-dominant cerulean cataract in a Chinese family associated with gene conversion mutation in beta-B2-crystallin.
Ophthalmic Res 2009;41
(3)
148- 153
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Lampi
KJMa
ZShih
M
et al. Sequence analysis of βA3, βB3, and βA4 crystallins completes the identification of the major proteins in young human lens.
J Biol Chem 1997;272
(4)
2268- 2275
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Pande
APande
JAsherie
N
et al. Crystal cataracts: human genetic cataract caused by protein crystallization.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98
(11)
6116- 6120
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.Gu
FLuo
WXLi
X
et al. A novel mutation in αA-crystallin (
CRYAA) caused autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a large Chinese family.
Hum Mutat 2008;29
(5)
769
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Willoughby
CEShafiq
AFerrini
W
et al.
CRYBB1 mutation associated with congenital cataract and microcornea.
Mol Vis 2005;11587- 593
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Mackay
DSBoskovska
OBKnopf
HLLampi
KJShiels
A A nonsense mutation in
CRYBB1 associated with autosomal dominant cataract linked to human chromosome 22q.
Am J Hum Genet 2002;71
(5)
1216- 1221
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Wang
JMa
XGu
F
et al. A missense mutation S228P in the
CRYBB1 gene causes autosomal dominant congenital cataract.
Chin Med J (Engl) 2007;120
(9)
820- 824
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Yang
JZhu
YGu
F
et al. A novel nonsense mutation in
CRYBB1 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract.
Mol Vis 2008;14727- 731
PubMedGoogle Scholar