Fundus photograph, Goldmann perimetry, and optical coherence tomography in the patient. A, Fundus photograph demonstrating the vitelliform “pseudohypopyon” macular appearance in the macula. B, Goldmann visual field demonstrating the central scotoma for light target 03e. C, Optical coherence tomography scan of the serous retinal detachment of the macula.
Western blotting analysis of the patient's serum against human retinal (HRE) proteins (A), α-enolase (B), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) proteins (C). The patient's serum diluted 1:100 was incubated with a blot containing proteins as follows: 10 μg of HRE proteins on the blot with molecular standards in lane 1, the patient's serum in lane 2, anti–α-enolase serum in lane 3, and antirecoverin serum in lane 4 (A); 1 μg of retinal α-enolase on the blot with the patient's serum in lane 1 and anti–α-enolase serum in lane 2 (B); and 10 μg of RPE proteins on the blot with molecular standards in lane 1, the patient's serum in lane 2, a negative control in lane 3, and anti–bestrophin-1 antiserum (1:2000) (Abcam, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts) in lane 4 (C). *Nonspecific band.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Eksandh L, Adamus G, Mosgrove L, Andréasson S. Autoantibodies Against Bestrophin in a Patient With Vitelliform Paraneoplastic Retinopathy and a Metastatic Choroidal Malignant Melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(3):432–435. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.3.432
Paraneoplastic retinopathies are rare disorders caused by the immune system's response to distal tumors. Autoantibodies generated against distant tumor antigens cross-react with different retinal proteins, resulting in retinal degeneration. Paraneoplastic retinopathies are usually divided into 2 major groups, cancer-associated retinopathy and melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR).
Cancer-associated retinopathy is usually seen in patients with small-cell carcinoma of the lung and is associated with autoantibodies against recoverin and α-enolase.1,2 The autoantibodies in cancer-associated retinopathy induce apoptotic death of the photoreceptors, resulting in a severe retinal degeneration affecting both cones and rods.3
Melanoma-associated retinopathy is usually seen in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma. The disorder often appears at the stage of metastases with a sudden onset of night blindness, photopsias, shimmering, and a varying degree of visual loss.4 Melanoma-associated retinopathy has been associated with autoantibodies against the retinal bipolar cells,5 and the typical full-field electroretinogram (ERG) shows a markedly reduced or absent dark-adapted b-wave and a preserved a-wave, confirming a defect in bipolar function.6
Melanoma-associated retinopathy usually has a normal retinal appearance.6 However, more recent studies have described patients with MAR or MAR-like symptoms with posterior uveitis, pigment epithelium changes, paracentral scars, optic disc pallor, and retinal vessel attenuation.4,7,8 A few patients with vitelliform retinal changes or serous retinal detachments resembling Best macular dystrophy (BMD) have also been described.9-12 In 3 of these patients, the primary tumor was a choroidal malignant melanoma.9,11,12
In this article, we describe a patient with a history of choroidal malignant melanoma in the left eye and a vitelliform macular appearance in the right eye, and we show for the first time to our knowledge the presence of circulating autoantibodies against bestrophin-1. The clinical appearance, including that on electro-oculography (EOG), resembled BMD.
A 45-year-old man had fluctuations in visual acuity and difficulties in dark night vision of a few months' duration in his right and only eye. Ten years prior, his left eye had been enucleated because of a choroidal malignant melanoma (spindle B type). One year previously, metastases in the liver and lungs were found and the patient was undergoing treatment with chemotherapy and radiation. There was no family history of night blindness, visual failure, or retinal disorders.
Ophthalmologic examination included assessment of best-corrected Snellen visual acuity, slitlamp examination, fundus inspection, kinetic perimetry with a Goldmann perimeter using standardized light targets I4e, V4e, and 03e (testing for scotoma), Farnsworth D15 testing, dark-adaptation threshold measured with the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer, dark-adapted full-field ERG, EOG, optical coherence tomography, and ultrasonography of the macular region.
Dark-adapted full-field ERGs and EOG were recorded using the Nicolet analysis system (Nicolet Biomedical Instruments, Madison, Wisconsin) according to the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards.13,14
The VMD2 gene was screened for mutations by DNA sequence analysis. One serum sample was analyzed for the presence of antiretinal and anti–retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) autoantibodies by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry using human retina as described previously by Adamus et al.15 The RPE was extracted from human RPE and the protein extract was prepared as follows. The RPE from a human eye was homogenized in a lysing buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich Co, Stockholm, Sweden) in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor cocktail. After centrifugation at 10 000g at 4°C for 30 minutes to remove debris, the protein concentration of the lysate was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce, Rockford, Illinois). Ten micrograms of proteins was used for gel electrophoresis. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
At examination, Snellen visual acuity was 0.9. The anterior segment of the eye was normal. There were no signs of uveitis. A central serous retinal detachment as a “pseudohypopyon” vitelliform lesion was seen in the macula (Figure 1A). The visual field revealed a central scotoma for the 03 object (Figure 1B) and the Farnsworth D15 test showed 2 errors along the tritan axe. The dark-adaptation threshold was normal. There were no signs of a recurrent tumor in the enucleated orbit.
Dark-adapted full-field ERGs were evaluated twice, 1 month apart. On both examinations, normal amplitudes were found regarding the responses to dim blue light, white light single flash (a- and b-wave), and 30-Hz flicker white light. On the first examination, the implicit time to 30-Hz flicker white light was on the upper limit for a normal timing (32.8 milliseconds), and reexamination showed a prolongation in the implicit time (34.1 milliseconds). The EOG showed a pathological Arden ratio of 1.1 (reference range, > 1.5). Optical coherence tomography showed a serous retinal detachment in the macula (Figure 1C). B-scan ultrasonography confirmed the macular retinal detachment, and no pathological findings could be found otherwise.
Based on the clinical appearance in the macula resembling BMD, a blood sample was examined for disease-causing mutations in the VMD2 gene. No mutation was found in exons 2, 4, 6, or 8 of the VMD2 gene.
A serum sample was examined for antiretinal and anti-RPE autoantibodies. Western blot analysis results were positive for antiretinal autoantibodies against α-enolase in a low titer and were negative for antirecoverin autoantibodies. The patient's serum antibodies mildly labeled the outer limiting membrane in the human retina. Testing serum for anti-RPE autoantibodies revealed the presence of autoantibodies against a 68-kDa protein, which was identified as bestrophin-1 (Figure 2).
After the last ophthalmologic examination, the disease worsened and widespread metastases were found. The patient died 4 months later.
Our patient had a history of a choroidal malignant melanoma in the left eye. Initially, he had a typical clinical appearance of BMD in the right eye, including a vitelliform pseudohypopyon lesion in the macula, pathological EOG findings, and a normal full-field ERG. Best macular dystrophy is an autosomal dominantly inherited disease caused by mutations in the VMD2 gene encoding the bestrophin-1 protein. The patient had no history of BMD in the family and genetic analysis of the VMD2 gene revealed no mutations.
Besides the BMD appearance in the eye, the patient reported typical MAR-like symptoms with difficulties with night vision. These symptoms together with the history of malignant choroidal melanoma led to the suspicion of MAR. However, repeated ERG examinations 1 month apart could not establish any defect in the bipolar cell function. The full-field ERG results were normal in amplitudes, but on the last examination the cone b-wave implicit time showed a clear prolongation. A prolongation in the cone b-wave implicit time is often associated with a progressive retinal disorder. It is possible that this patient would have developed a MAR syndrome in later time.
Three cases with a history of choroidal malignant melanoma and similar vitelliform retinal findings or serous retinal detachments have previously been reported. One of these patients had a typical MAR determined by full-field ERG findings and antiretinal antibodies against bipolar cells,9 and the other 2 patients had MAR-like symptoms but electrophysiological and serological testing were not done.11,12 Similar retinal alterations have also been reported in other patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma and MAR or MAR-like symptoms.8,10-12 These cases might represent a variant of MAR or a new paraneoplastic entity.
It was first reported that patients with MAR had antibodies directed against retinal bipolar cells.5 More recent studies have reported antibodies reactive to a 22-kDa neuronal antigen,16 a 35-kDa protein in Müller cells,17 transducin-β,18 mitofilin, and titin.19 Probably several more yet unknown antigens are involved in this disorder,20 suggesting further heterogeneity of the syndrome. To emphasize the complicity of paraneoplastic retinopathy, autoantibodies to bipolar cells have also been reported in a patient with cancer-associated retinopathy.21
Our patient had autoantibodies against retinal α-enolase in low titer and, more interestingly, to an RPE protein—bestrophin-1. Autoantibodies against α-enolase are often found in patients with paraneoplastic retinopathies.2 The electrophysiological features of α-enolase retinopathy range from a central cone dysfunction to a variable degree of global cone-rod dysfunction. A prolongation in cone b-wave implicit times has also been reported.22 The presence of anti–α-enolase autoantibodies could explain the prolongation in implicit time in the full-field ERG seen in our patient, but we consider it unlikely that these autoantibodies would produce the abnormal EOG findings.
Bestrophin-1 is a 585–amino acid, 68-kDa putative integral transmembrane protein localized to the basolateral aspect of the RPE.23 This protein has previously been described as a calcium ion–dependent chloride channel and a modulator for voltage-dependent calcium ion channels in RPE cells.24 It is still unclear in what way a dysfunction of bestrophin-1 results in a typical BMD phenotype with a vitelliform macular appearance and a light peak reduction in EOG. Based on the autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance of BMD, dominant negative effects would be expected. However, BMD is known to have a large variability in expressivity, and recent studies showed that the disorder may have a compound heterozygous pattern of inheritance as well.25 The result of autoantibodies to bestrophin-1 action would be expected to cause a loss of protein function. However, mice lacking bestrophin have no retinal abnormalities.26 A previous study has shown the importance of VMD2 encoding bestrophin-1 in ocular development.27 It is possible that bestrophin-1 has different functions in the eye during different stages of life. Our patient would be expected to have an acquired bestrophin-1 dysfunction in adulthood, whereas patients with BMD have a congenital defect to the protein. The function of bestrophin-1 needs to be further elucidated in future studies. We believe that the electrophysiological findings in our patient could be related to autoantibodies against bestrophin-1 as well as against α-enolase.
In conclusion, paraneoplastic retinopathies are complex disorders caused by various antiretinal autoantibodies and possibly by anti-RPE autoantibodies. In patients with choroidal malignant melanoma, the paraneoplastic retinopathy may manifest with the clinical appearance of BMD, possibly owing to circulating autoantibodies directed against bestrophin-1. Whether this expression of disease should be considered as a separate paraneoplastic entity or a variant of MAR remains to be clarified.
Correspondence: Dr Eksandh, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Lund, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants from Åke Wibergs stiftelse, the Swedish Medical Research Council, and Foundation Fighting Blindness and by grant EY13053 from the National Institutes of Health (Dr Adamus).
Additional Contributions: Susanne Boystrom provided skillful technical assistance.
Create a personal account or sign in to: