Variation in clinical care is one of the biggest obstacles facing health care organizations that prevents them from improving outcomes.1 In previous work, Cramer et al2 validated 5 quality metrics for head and neck cancer that meet validity criteria. High adherence to these metrics was associated with a 19% reduced hazard of mortality, suggesting strong suitability for more widespread adoption.2 However, although variation of quality of care has been studied elsewhere, variation of these quality metrics has not been examined in depth. Commission on Cancer hospitals, which have been accredited based on several benchmarks for comprehensive, high-quality cancer care, treat approximately 70% of patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. Therefore, variation among these centers may identify opportunities for improvement that could be addressed through existing quality improvement programs.
Strober WA, Sridharan S, Duvvuri U, Cramer JD. Variation in the Quality of Head and Neck Cancer Care in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(2):188–191. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3632
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: