[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 65
Citations 0
Comment & Response
October 3, 2019

Between Current Implications and Future Perspectives

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 3Section Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online October 3, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2791

To the Editor We would like to respond to the invited commentary1 to our meta-analysis and literature review on the benefit of imaging in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL).2 The authors suggest that our review (1) dismisses imaging for USNHL as useless in most children, and (2) frames imaging in a way that discourages patients and parents from imaging. However, we would like to emphasize that this is neither our message nor what we practice.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×