To the Editor We would like to respond to the invited commentary1 to our meta-analysis and literature review on the benefit of imaging in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL).2 The authors suggest that our review (1) dismisses imaging for USNHL as useless in most children, and (2) frames imaging in a way that discourages patients and parents from imaging. However, we would like to emphasize that this is neither our message nor what we practice.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Ropers FG, Rotteveel LJC, Dekkers OM. Between Current Implications and Future Perspectives. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(11):1081–1082. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2791
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: