[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.240.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 855
Citations 0
Original Investigation
December 26, 2019

Rates of Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Head and Neck Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, St John Health System, Tulsa, Oklahoma
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online December 26, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3967
Key Points

Question  What are the rates of discontinuation or nonpublication of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about head and neck cancer, and what are the potential factors associated with trial discontinuation and nonpublication?

Findings  In this study of 130 RCTs, 92 trials (70.8%) were completed and 38 (29.2%) were discontinued, with committee recommendations as the most common reason for discontinuation of trials. Of the 130 RCTs, 67 (51.3%) were published and 63 (48.5%) were unpublished, with trials funded by other sources more likely to reach publication than industry-funded RCTs.

Meaning  The rate of discontinuation and nonpublication of RCTs of head and neck cancer appears to be high, which may thwart scientific advancements, dissuade patient participation in trials, and unnecessarily expose patients to unproven and potentially harmful interventions.

Abstract

Importance  Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) play an important role in clinical decision-making, and discontinuation or nonpublication of these trials are causes of great concern. The extent of discontinued or unpublished RCTs about head and neck cancer remains unclear.

Objective  To assess the rate of discontinuation or nonpublication of RCTs involving patients with head and neck cancer. This objective was measured by observing 3 domains: discontinuation of trial, nonpublication of trial data, and feasibility of contacting trial investigators of aforementioned trials.

Evidence Review  For this study, the sample was derived using the ClinicalTrials.gov advanced search feature on March 18, 2019, to locate completed and discontinued RCTs pertaining to head and neck cancer registered before this date. Trials were analyzed to identify reasons for trial discontinuation and publication status of each trial. If publication status or reason for trial discontinuation was not allocated through the systematic search of ClinicalTrials.gov, the corresponding author was emailed to determine publication status.

Findings  After exclusions, 130 RCTs were included. Of these trials, 92 (70.8%) were completed and 38 (29.2%) were discontinued for various reasons. The most common reason for discontinuation of trials was committee recommendations. Of the 130 analyzed trials, 67 (51.5%) were published in a peer-reviewed journal and 63 (48.5%) were unpublished trials. Of the 92 completed trials, 55 (59.8%) were published and 37 (40.2%) remained unpublished 3 or more years after trial completion. Trials funded by other sources (private, nonprofit, or the National Institutes of Health) were more likely to reach publication than industry-funded RCTs (unadjusted odds ratio, 4.3 [95% CI, 1.3-14.0]; adjusted odds ratio, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.2-14.3]).

Conclusions and Relevance  Of RCTs in head and neck cancer, 29.2% were discontinued and 40.2% completed trials never reached publication. The findings suggest that needs exist for RCT guidance of head and neck cancer. The reporting of reasons for trial discontinuation appears to be lacking, and trial publication rates were low. This study is relevant to many physicians and researchers because it identifies potential sources of decreased research productivity and ethics.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×