[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.168.209. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 104
Citations 0
Comment & Response
February 20, 2020

Cochlear Implant Access for Veterans—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
  • 2Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
  • 3VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
  • 4National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland, Oregon
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(4):387-388. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4792

In Reply We are grateful to have the opportunity to respond to the letter by Cambron et al. With their help, we analyzed an updated 2019 data set using the same techniques we had previously applied to information from 2017 for use in our study.1

As Cambron et al point out and our data show, the opening of new cochlear implant centers in the interim has allowed veterans in major metropolitan areas such as Indianapolis, Las Vegas, New Orleans, and San Diego, and smaller urban centers such as Eugene, Oregon and Reno, Nevada to gain significantly better access particularly to centers providing audiologic services (Figure). Ongoing apparent disparities elsewhere may paradoxically reflect superior levels of care: outcomes are likely to be better at high-volume centers, which naturally require larger catchment areas. For example, veterans in Arizona are on average distant from care, but the alternative—developing a patchwork of small centers spread throughout the state—would dilute the pool of experienced and highly specialized cochlear implant clinicians.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×