[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 255
Citations 0
Comment & Response
September 3, 2020

Tracheostomy During COVID-19 Pandemic—In Search of Lost Timing—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
  • 4Amandela ENT Head and Neck Centre, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online September 3, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2633

In Reply We thank Cazzador et al for their appreciation of the Viewpoint “Surgical Considerations for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak.”1 Since the publication, several other groups have also developed guidelines for tracheostomy in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with similar goals of minimizing perioperative aerosolization risks.2

We agree with Cazzador et al that an optimal timing for tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 has not been clearly established. Given that open tracheostomy performed with the necessary personal protective equipment has proven to be safe during SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and COVID-19,1 in general, we would consider tracheostomy in a patient approaching 14 days of intubation without the possibility of imminent successful extubation.

We have thus far not advocated early tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 in the absence of any compelling evidence to do so. Evaluating benefit from early tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 is a challenging task, given the variable clinical severity of COVID-19 among patients and the multiple risk factors that are associated with disease severity.

In a multicenter cohort study of 53 patients with COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy, Chao et al3 reported that 56.6% of patients were liberated from the ventilator at a mean (SD) of 11.8 (6.9) days after tracheostomy. The authors observed a weak positive correlation between time to tracheostomy and posttracheostomy ventilator dependence, suggesting some support for earlier tracheostomy. Nonetheless, the authors also acknowledged the possibility of selection bias of healthier patients for earlier tracheostomy and delayed tracheostomy in patients with questionable prognoses.

A randomized clinical trial with specific patient selection criteria would be ideal to address this question. However, it has been our experience, and also the experience of others,4 that most patients with COVID-19 who require intubation can be successfully extubated within the first 14 days. Therefore, careful selection of patients who will benefit from tracheostomy is required for such a clinical trial.

In relation to percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, there have been reports of percutaneous tracheostomy being safely performed in patients with COVID-19, with special emphasis on minimizing aerosolization, including complete paralysis of the patient and pausing ventilation during instrumentation of the airway.3 A technique involving placement of the bronchoscope alongside the endotracheal tube (rather than inside of it) to minimize aerosolization has been described.5,6 Nonetheless, one should be cognizant of the aerosolization risks involved, especially during a difficult percutaneous tracheostomy procedure or one in which a complication occurs. If these risks are unacceptable, then an open tracheostomy with direct surgical control of the airway would be the safest approach.

We once again thank Cazzador et al for their thoughtful comments and the opportunity to discuss these issues.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Woei Shyang Loh, MBBS, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Level 7, Singapore 119228 (entlws@nus.edu.sg).

Published Online: September 3, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2633

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Tay  JK, Khoo  ML, Loh  WS.  Surgical Considerations for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak.   JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online March 31, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0764PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
McGrath  BA, Brenner  MJ, Warrillow  SJ,  et al.  Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance.   Lancet Respir Med. 2020;S2213-2600(20)30230-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Chao  TN, Harbison  SP, Braslow  BM,  et al.  Outcomes after tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients.   Ann Surg. Published online June 11, 2020. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004166PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Takhar  A, Walker  A, Tricklebank  S,  et al.  Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic.   Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(8):2173-2184. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-05993-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Angel  L, Kon  ZN, Chang  SH,  et al.  Novel percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients with COVID-19.   Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;S0003-4975(20)30603-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Vargas  M, Russo  G, Iacovazzo  C, Servillo  G.  Modified percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 critically ill patients.   Head Neck. 2020;42(7):1363-1366. doi:10.1002/hed.26276PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×