[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 1965

MALLEUS VS MALLEOLUS

Author Affiliations

University Hospitals University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa

Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;81(6):641. doi:10.1001/archotol.1965.00750050656021

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The Editorial Board of the Archives invites its readers to submit letters to the Editor, which should be written in a constructive manner. A copy of the letter will be sent to the author(s) of articles commented on, or persons otherwise mentioned, who will be invited to prepare a brief reply, to be published along with the original letter sent to the Editor.

G. E. Shambaugh, MD

To the Editor: Although the question of malleolar versus malleal ligaments was settled in the February issue of the Archives, I thought you would be interested in the origin of the confusion.

According to Henry A. Skinner (The Origin of Medical Terms, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1961), Vesalius was the first person to draw a picture of the malleus in 1543. He used two terms in describing it—malleus meaning hammer, and malleolus meaning little hammer. It is unfortunate that people continued to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×