[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
April 1966


Author Affiliations

Fort Sam Houston, Tex

Arch Otolaryngol. 1966;83(4):396-397. doi:10.1001/archotol.1966.00760020398024

To the Editor: In order for clinical findings to be meaningful to all, they must be reported in a clear and concise manner. The audiogram is perhaps the only test remaining that some investigators believe needs 50 or more symbols to indicate abnormality.

A case in point is a recent audiogram reported by Matz et al.1 Forty-eight carefully drawn symbols were used to indicate that a patient was deaf.

Sataloff2 recently indicated that there are a number of ways of marking bone conduction on an audiogram, but that the most widely used and accepted is demonstrated on the following diagram: [ Right ear, ] Left ear. I agree that there are currently a number of ways of marking bone-conduction symbols, and would add that there are also a number of ways of marking air conduction, nor response, masking, etc. So many in fact, that