[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.108.182. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1969

Electronystagmography

Author Affiliations

New Orleans
From the Department of Otolaryngology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1969;89(1):19-21. doi:10.1001/archotol.1969.00770020021003
Abstract

WHY BOTHER with electronystagmography (ENG)? Can I learn anything through the use of this technique that I could not learn otherwise? These are the questions that many ask. I would answer these questions with yet another question. Would any of you discard your audiometers (whatever the vintage) and be limited to the use of tuning forks when faced with a hearing problem? I will concede that you could with understanding, careful testing, and perseverance evaluate your patient's hearing and arrive at a clinically practical deduction with only tuning forks. I am just as certain, however, that none of you would be willing to give up these audiometric advantages:

  1. Precise hearing thresholds.

  2. Sophisticated testing procedures which make possible the differentiation of:

    • Conductive losses from sensorineural involvement.

    • Cochlear from retrocochlear involvement, and even in some instances localization of central nervous system lesions.

  3. Accurate records which can be

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×