This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—I would like to congratulate Dr. R. C. Reynolds on the editorial "Otolaryngology and Family Practice" which appeared in the October 1971 issue of the Archives.
The suggested approach of integrating otolaryngology in the training of family practitioners deserves our unanimous support. The results of such a program would give the patient better primary care, the practitioner more satisfaction, and perhaps improve the image of our own specialty.
In particular may I draw attention to the remark that otolaryngology is not primarily a surgical specialty, but that most ENT disease is medical in nature. It seems a pity that this self-evident truth is not more appreciated by those involved in resident training. Perhaps, judging from the content of our journals it is not recognized by the editorial staff as well.
It would seem that most resident training schemes are largely surgically orientated. The "good" residency involves an
CAMBON KG. OTOLARYNGOLOGY. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;95(3):284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1972.00770080426020
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: