• Twenty-one patients with oral cavity and pharyngeal carcinomas were enrolled in a prospective protocol to study the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging vs computed tomography. Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be superior to computed tomography in the area of tumor contrast (conspicuity) and equal or inferior in edge definition, delineation of regional disease, and lymph node metastasis. These findings are consistent with the current applications and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging.
(Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:730-734)
Schaefer SD, Maravilla KR, Suss RA, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Computed Tomography: Comparison in Imaging Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Carcinomas. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(11):730–734. doi:10.1001/archotol.1985.00800130062006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: