[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1987

Recertification: A Concept Without a Mechanism?

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(9):1006-1007. doi:10.1001/archotol.1987.01860090104035

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—There is currently a great deal of alarming discussion about recertification. I, for one, abhor the thought of once again having to go before some eminent body, which might with a simple pass or fail vote decide whether or not I will continue the practice of medicine.

While I feel reasonably certain that the combination of the endorsement from my residency director, passing a written examination and then passing an oral examination, was a fair and reasonable means of assessing my knowledge and ability to go into the practice of medicine, I do not believe an examination 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, or even 42 years later can possibly be a meaningful assessment of my ability to continue as an effective practitioner.

Why then are we even discussing this matter? The answer, I assume, is that it is perceived that a small number of our medical group

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×