This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—There is currently a great deal of alarming discussion about recertification. I, for one, abhor the thought of once again having to go before some eminent body, which might with a simple pass or fail vote decide whether or not I will continue the practice of medicine.
While I feel reasonably certain that the combination of the endorsement from my residency director, passing a written examination and then passing an oral examination, was a fair and reasonable means of assessing my knowledge and ability to go into the practice of medicine, I do not believe an examination 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, or even 42 years later can possibly be a meaningful assessment of my ability to continue as an effective practitioner.
Why then are we even discussing this matter? The answer, I assume, is that it is perceived that a small number of our medical group
DAVIDSON TM. Recertification: A Concept Without a Mechanism?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(9):1006–1007. doi:10.1001/archotol.1987.01860090104035