[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.244.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1993

Single Treatment Approaches to Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Herdman, Tusa, Zee, Proctor, and Mattox) and Neurology (Drs Tusa and Zee), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(4):450-454. doi:10.1001/archotol.1993.01880160098015
Abstract

• Objective.  —To determine the effectiveness of two different physical therapy approaches for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Design.  —Randomized study.

Setting.  —Outpatient clinic.

Patients.  —Consecutive sample of 60 patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Intervention.  —Patients received either a single treatment based on the hypothesis that the vertigo and nystagmus of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo are due to debris adhering to the cupula of the posterior semicircular canal (cupulolithiasis) or a single treatment based on the hypothesis that the debris is free floating in the long arm of the posterior canal (canalithiasis). Patients were reevaluated 1 to 2 weeks after the treatment and again 4 to 6 months later.

Outcome.  —Treatment outcome was classified as either asymptomatic, more than 70% improved as rated by the patient, or no change.

Results.  —The treatment designed for cupulolithiasis resulted in remission of vertigo and nystagmus in 70% of the patients and in improvement of the symptoms in another 20%. The treatment designed for canalithiasis resulted in remission of vertigo and nystagmus in 57% of the patients and in improvement in another 33%. There was no statistically significant difference between treatments.

Conclusions.  —These single-treatment approaches are equally effective treatments for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Further studies are needed to look at the long-term effectiveness of these treatments.(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:450-454)

×