—To compare laser surgery and sharp blade excision of rhinophyma.
—Retrospective study of 23 patients treated surgically for rhinophyma.
—Four academic tertiary referral medical centers.
—All 23 patients had moderate or major rhinophyma.
—Sixteen patients had laser surgery. Seven patients had sharp blade excision.
—Length of the procedure, preservation of normal tissue, the need for skin grafting, intraoperative pain and discomfort, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain and discomfort, postoperative bleeding, complications, and end results (all listed in the literature as advantages of laser surgery).
—No difference in length of surgery, preservation of normal tissue, complications, postoperative pain, and end results. No need for skin grafting in both procedures. Less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, easier and smoother procedure, and more comfortable postoperative care with laser surgery.
—Our results do not agree with most of the list of advantages attributed to laser rhinophyma surgery in the literature.(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:628-631)
Har-El G, Shapshay SM, Bohigian RK, Krespi YP, Lucente FE. The Treatment of Rhinophyma: 'Cold' vs Laser Techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(6):628–631. doi:10.1001/archotol.1993.01880180042007
Monkeypox Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.