Early Risk Factors for Enlargement of the Tracheoesophageal Puncture After Total Laryngectomy: Nodal Metastasis and Extent of Surgery | Head and Neck Cancer | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.236.187.155. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Xi S. Effectiveness of voice rehabilitation on vocalisation in postlaryngectomy patients: a systematic review.  Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010;8(4):256-25821091891PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Sturgis EM, Kapadia A, Risser J. Enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Head Neck. 2011;33(1):20-3020848420PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Op de Coul BM, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ, Tan IB, van den Hoogen FJ, van Tinteren H. A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single Institution's experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(11):1320-132811074828PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Sturgis EM, Risser J. Multivariable analysis of risk factors for enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy.  Head Neck. 2012;34(4):557-56721692129PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Sturgis EM, Risser J. Outcomes and adverse events of enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy.  Laryngoscope. 2011;121(7):1455-146121647906PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Dube SR, Asman K, Malarcher A, Carabollo R. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008.  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2009;58(44):1227-1232Google Scholar
7.
Dawson DA. Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) website. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh27-1/18-29.htm. Accessed April 10, 2012
8.
Piccirillo JF. Importance of comorbidity in head and neck cancer.  Laryngoscope. 2000;110(4):593-60210764003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
 Defining overweight and obesity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html. Accessed March 15, 2010
10.
 Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Bulletin of Information: Section of Clinical Chemistry: Clinical Chemistry Normal Values (Adult). Houston: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 2008
11.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2000
12.
Bozec A, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E,  et al.  Results of vocal rehabilitation using tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and their predictive factors.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(5):751-75819890656PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Yu P, Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ,  et al.  Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap after total laryngopharyngectomy.  Cancer. 2010;116(7):1718-172420120029PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Sinclair CF, Rosenthal EL, McColloch NL,  et al.  Primary versus delayed tracheoesophageal puncture for laryngopharyngectomy with free flap reconstruction.  Laryngoscope. 2011;121(7):1436-144021541947PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lewin JS, Barringer DA, May AH,  et al.  Functional outcomes after laryngopharyngectomy with anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction.  Head Neck. 2006;28(2):142-14916302192PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Shingaki S, Suzuki I, Nakajima T, Hayashi T, Nakayama H, Nakamura M. Computed tomographic evaluation of lymph node metastasis in head and neck carcinomas.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995;23(4):233-2377560109PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Haberal I, Celik H, Göçmen H, Akmansu H, Yörük M, Ozeri C. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):197-20114990916PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
ONLINE FIRST
Sep 2012

Early Risk Factors for Enlargement of the Tracheoesophageal Puncture After Total Laryngectomy: Nodal Metastasis and Extent of Surgery

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Hutcheson, Sturgis, and Lewin) and Epidemiology (Dr Sturgis), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(9):833-839. doi:10.1001/archoto.2012.1753
Abstract

Objective To determine the early risk factors for enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) after total laryngectomy.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Patients The study included 194 patients who underwent total laryngectomy (with or without pharyngectomy) and TEP (2003-2008).

Main Outcome Measures Multiple logistic regression methods were used to evaluate early risk factors for an enlarged TEP.

Results The incidence of an enlarged TEP was 18.6% (36 of 194 patients). After adjustment for follow-up time and radiotherapy history, patients with nodal metastases had a significantly higher risk of TEP enlargement (adjusted odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-26.6) than those with node-negative disease. Total laryngopharyngectomy significantly increased the risk of an enlarged TEP (adjusted odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.7) compared with simple total laryngectomy. Before multivariable adjustment, the preoperative body mass index was also significantly associated with enlargement (P for trend, .04).

Conclusions These data suggest that 2 clinical factors—nodal staging and extent of resection—may help identify those at highest risk for TEP enlargement early after surgery. These simple indicators may ultimately aid in patient selection and prevention of an enlarged TEP after total laryngectomy.

×